Bellamy rumour

[Gemmill 46138]

All Souness or Riise's fault tbh [/leazesmag]

 

Aye, the "Scottish fuckpig" will clearly be the one responsible to this. It all stems back to the incident when Souness grabbed Bellamy by the throat in training (LM knows that this happened btw, so don't bother arguing). I sincerely hope that this is the end of that little tit at Liverpool. It'll be fucking great if it is.

 

[LM]Players can do whatever they want off the pitch as long as they perform on it. And yes, that includes setting about their team mates with a golf club.[/LM]

[peasepud 59]

 

[LM]Players can do whatever they want off the pitch as long as they perform on it. And yes, that includes setting about their team mates with a golf club.[/LM]

 

Yep, I mean whats threatening your teammates career by actually ploating him numerous times across the legs with a club? a quick goal against ManuRe and its all ok.

[tinofbeans 91]

craig bellamy = thick inbred goat buggering woman attacking beatch.

 

handy with a golf club then is he. what a twat....

[Asprilla 96]

 

FOUGHT in a hotel as Bellamy lashed out at Riise's £5 million legs with a golf club

 

 

[luckyluke 2]

Let me get this straight, the Riise wouldn't join Hobgoblin on stage for a duet so Hobgoblin atttacked him with a golf club.

 

Priceless.

[Gemmill 46138]

Let me get this straight, the Riise wouldn't join Hobgoblin on stage for a duet so Hobgoblin atttacked him with a golf club.

 

Priceless.

 

Undermined his authoritayyy tbf.

[luckyluke 2]

Let me get this straight, the Riise wouldn't join Hobgoblin on stage for a duet so Hobgoblin atttacked him with a golf club.

 

Priceless.

 

Undermined his authoritayyy tbf.

 

 

Can I just say how glad I was to see the first post in the thread, when I read the title I was horrifed that the odious little turd might be signing for us again.

 

Incidentally, if he'd tried this carry on with Shearer, wor Al would have knocked seven bells out of him.

[Gejon 2]

I knew he couldnt take on a fella on his own, pussy.

[peasepud 59]

Let me get this straight, the Riise wouldn't join Hobgoblin on stage for a duet so Hobgoblin atttacked him with a golf club.

 

Priceless.

 

Undermined his authoritayyy tbf.

 

[Fop 1]

Apparently Liverpool were away in Portugal on a team building session and Bellamy beat Riise up with a golf club!

 

Can't be true, Bellamy can't even beat up 18 year old girls.

 

He's a vindictive little dwavf with a twisted personality and vile temperament, but it'd be like getting "mauled" by a Pomeranian.

 

not that I know what he's like either way, but presuming you haven't met him and are only going on what you have read in the tabloids, would you be happy for someone you've never met talk about you like that?

 

Well I'm not a dwarf for a start so they'd be completely wrong about that.

 

Personally I couldn't careless what people I don't know say or think about me, nor can I see why anyone would, so I don't really see your point, but IF I did care then I guess I wouldn't act in the way he does.

 

 

As for proof of his character, there's not only being all the fights and scraps and trouble he's been into (tbh I think he only got of that latest night club assault charge - his what 3rd or is it 4th assault charge now - because of the imbalance of expensive lawyers vs legal aid muppets - and he only got off the assault charge from what he said in court that he said to the slappers in question is more than enough to underline his character), but also all the times he's got into trouble on the pitch.

 

If he wasn't a footballer he'd probably be in prison for beating up some woman or other.

 

If you want believe he's a good lad, ok that's your choice..... but I tell you what send me £5,000 and I'll send it back within a month with it doubled, honest.

 

Like I said, I don't whether he is a good lad or not, I'd be prepared to use the old analogy 'mud sticks' and not like myself for thinking it, but it's unfortunately human nature. My point is I wouldn't have used those words about someone I had never met, based purely on media coverage or he said/she said allegations.

 

If the roles were reversed, I don't believe for one minute you 'couldn't care less what people I don't know say or think about me' given the wording above.

 

 

It's not like he's been totally falsely accused of rape or something (or has he come to think of it? ).

 

There's several incidents where he's just gone bananas (including this one seemingly) over NOTHING or some minor slight to his GODZILLA like ego.

 

There's been several court cases against him, all of which IMO he'd probably not have got off without being a realitively famous and rich footballer with vastly expensive lawyers (look at how many celeberaties have got off driving offences with a fine for which ordinary people would have faced a ban - good lawyers are more than 1/2 the battle), but even though he has, mostly through his expensive lawyers couching him on what to say and doing thier best to make the witness look unreliable, but the stuff he's ADMITTED to doing and saying is more than enough to back up the fact he's an odious little toe-rag.

 

 

 

 

 

As for me I cannot understand why anyone would be bothered about what people they don't know say..... of course someone like Bellamy would probably just take a chair or a golfclub to them (which is the right and proper course of action, of course ), assuming he had the element of suprise, thought they weren't going to hit him back and were smaller and hopefully female.

 

Can't imagine why people would have a low opinion of the vicous little dwarf.

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

Apparently Liverpool were away in Portugal on a team building session and Bellamy beat Riise up with a golf club!

 

Can't be true, Bellamy can't even beat up 18 year old girls.

 

He's a vindictive little dwavf with a twisted personality and vile temperament, but it'd be like getting "mauled" by a Pomeranian.

 

not that I know what he's like either way, but presuming you haven't met him and are only going on what you have read in the tabloids, would you be happy for someone you've never met talk about you like that?

 

Well I'm not a dwarf for a start so they'd be completely wrong about that.

 

Personally I couldn't careless what people I don't know say or think about me, nor can I see why anyone would, so I don't really see your point, but IF I did care then I guess I wouldn't act in the way he does.

 

 

As for proof of his character, there's not only being all the fights and scraps and trouble he's been into (tbh I think he only got of that latest night club assault charge - his what 3rd or is it 4th assault charge now - because of the imbalance of expensive lawyers vs legal aid muppets - and he only got off the assault charge from what he said in court that he said to the slappers in question is more than enough to underline his character), but also all the times he's got into trouble on the pitch.

 

If he wasn't a footballer he'd probably be in prison for beating up some woman or other.

 

If you want believe he's a good lad, ok that's your choice..... but I tell you what send me £5,000 and I'll send it back within a month with it doubled, honest.

 

Like I said, I don't whether he is a good lad or not, I'd be prepared to use the old analogy 'mud sticks' and not like myself for thinking it, but it's unfortunately human nature. My point is I wouldn't have used those words about someone I had never met, based purely on media coverage or he said/she said allegations.

 

If the roles were reversed, I don't believe for one minute you 'couldn't care less what people I don't know say or think about me' given the wording above.

 

 

It's not like he's been totally falsely accused of rape or something (or has he come to think of it? ).

 

There's several incidents where he's just gone bananas (including this one seemingly) over NOTHING or some minor slight to his GODZILLA like ego.

 

There's been several court cases against him, all of which IMO he'd probably not have got off without being a realitively famous and rich footballer with vastly expensive lawyers (look at how many celeberaties have got off driving offences with a fine for which ordinary people would have faced a ban - good lawyers are more than 1/2 the battle), but even though he has, mostly through his expensive lawyers couching him on what to say and doing thier best to make the witness look unreliable, but the stuff he's ADMITTED to doing and saying is more than enough to back up the fact he's an odious little toe-rag.

 

 

 

 

 

As for me I cannot understand why anyone would be bothered about what people they don't know say..... of course someone like Bellamy would probably just take a chair or a golfclub to them (which is the right and proper course of action, of course ), assuming he had the element of suprise, thought they weren't going to hit him back and were smaller and hopefully female.

 

Can't imagine why people would have a low opinion of the vicous little dwarf.

 

Once again, I'm not saying you can't think he's a bad bloke, I just take issue with the language used considering the people have had no first hand experience with the bloke, and I do not believe for a second that anyone would not care about the same comments in kind.

 

Obviously if he's twatted Riise in the way it's been reported, then that's wrong, but I don't for one minute think he'll be sacked because apparently according to you there has been a precedent set. If your opinion is to be believed, having already got away with battering several women he was still allowed to play for and adored by the Toon and Liverpool.

 

I really can't see what a lawyer could have said to get him off an assault charge if a bird rocks up with bruises and witnesses saying it was you who hit her. No one's furnished any details of the other assault from the Toon days either I see, although I found a refenece that he was cautioned.

[Fop 1]

 

 

Once again, I'm not saying you can't think he's a bad bloke, I just take issue with the language used considering the people have had no first hand experience with the bloke, and I do not believe for a second that anyone would not care about the same comments in kind.

 

Quick report me to the police for vindictive little dwarf with a twisted personality and vile temperament-ism then!

 

I shall await the smashing in of my door a 4am to be dragged off to the station and my confession beaten out of me.

 

Then you can just sit back and bask in your feeling of smug superiority or whatever it is gets you excited (I mean ffs do you have nothing better to worry about? ).

 

(and again as I said I do not, but IF I did then the simple answer would be not to do it in the first place – tbh I’m beginning to think you’re related to the twisted little hobbit)

 

 

 

Obviously if he's twatted Riise in the way it's been reported, then that's wrong, but I don't for one minute think he'll be sacked because apparently according to you there has been a precedent set. If your opinion is to be believed, having already got away with battering several women he was still allowed to play for and adored by the Toon and Liverpool.

 

Of course he won't be sacked he's worth too much to them in a monetary sense, and so long as he plays his football that's all they'll care about (unless he does something SO bad that it will cost them more in revenue keeping him than it would ignoring it).

 

The only reason Souness got rid was because it had come to a position where if he'd kept him his authority would have been completely undermined and he was left with no real choice in the matter.

 

 

I really can't see what a lawyer could have said to get him off an assault charge if a bird rocks up with bruises and witnesses saying it was you who hit her. No one's furnished any details of the other assault from the Toon days either I see, although I found a refenece that he was cautioned.

 

You clearly have little idea of how British justice works then, knowing how to play the system, or in this case paying someone that knows exactly how to work the system stacks things massively in your favour, especially in a one word against another type case.

 

How else do you think those people get off when two people are high on drugs crash as car into someone, kill them, are both caught at the scene, but then get off because they both deny they were driving and the police can’t prove conclusively which one it was (and that’s just low grade chav cunning, not top draw legal techicalism).

[gram 0]

Well its not just British Law. Ariel Sharon should have been banged up years ago for his part in the Sabra Shatila massacre. He got off with it on a technicality cos he wasnt in Belgium. Amazing. That he later led the country tells you all you need to know about politics and the law.

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

You clearly have little idea of how British justice works then, knowing how to play the system, or in this case paying someone that knows exactly how to work the system stacks things massively in your favour, especially in a one word against another type case.

 

How else do you think those people get off when two people are high on drugs crash as car into someone, kill them, are both caught at the scene, but then get off because they both deny they were driving and the police can’t prove conclusively which one it was (and that’s just low grade chav cunning, not top draw legal techicalism).

 

On the two points above, I was referring to case with a woman with bruises and witnesses to an assault. You are referring to a case of 'one word against another' backed by a good lawyer. There is an obvious difference here, which is what I have been alluding to all along. Again, in my opinion, a flashy lawyer could never get some off an assault charge given the evidence (O.J. withstanding ).

 

I would imagine the car crash thing is down to there being no independant witnesses (quite different from a nightclub setting), although, I would be surprised there was no way of proving who was driving given current forensics. Is this a recent case?

 

I will respectfully decline comment on the rest of your post as you don't seem to grasp that on a public forum anyone has the right to question someone else's use of words

[wykikitoon 20885]

Stevie G:

 

"eh lads lads lads "

 

[peasepud 59]

[ewerk 31230]

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

I love the fact they all went over just 'for a rest'.

 

Sad that for a trip like this for so-called professionals, it seems you would have to impose an alchohol ban for it to work.

[Jimbo 175]

I love the fact they all went over just 'for a rest'.

 

Sad that for a trip like this for so-called professionals, it seems you would have to impose an alchohol ban for it to work.

 

 

To be fair its not as if they've got an important Champions League match against Barcelona coming up in the week is it.

 

[gram 0]

Benitez issues discipline warning

 

Liverpool are preparing to play Barcelona in the Champions League

Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez will take disciplinary action and fine any player who breached club rules during their training camp in Portugal.

It follows newspaper allegations of a fracas between Craig Bellamy and John Arne Riise on the trip.

 

"I've made it clear to them the responsibilities that come with playing for this club and how they are expected to conduct themselves," said Benitez.

 

Liverpool play Barcelona in the Champions League on Wednesday.

 

Benitez added: "The players worked extremely hard at last week's training camp but we will take disciplinary action and fine any of them who are found to have breached club rules during our stay in Portugal.

 

"Despite reports to the contrary, the spirit amongst the lads is very good, with everyone looking forward to the game against Barcelona on Wednesday.

 

"We remain totally focused on what will be a very tough game against the defending European Champions."

 

No smoke without fire

[peasepud 59]

Benitez issues discipline warning

 

Liverpool are preparing to play Barcelona in the Champions League

Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez will take disciplinary action and fine any player who breached club rules during their training camp in Portugal.

 

No smoke without fire

 

Do you reckon the club rules include :

 

No player shall take a nine iron to the legs of a teammate.

 

[gram 0]

Benitez issues discipline warning

 

Liverpool are preparing to play Barcelona in the Champions League

Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez will take disciplinary action and fine any player who breached club rules during their training camp in Portugal.

 

No smoke without fire

 

Do you reckon the club rules include :

 

No player shall take a nine iron to the legs of a teammate.

 

Its what they do on the pitch that matters

[Fop 1]

You clearly have little idea of how British justice works then, knowing how to play the system, or in this case paying someone that knows exactly how to work the system stacks things massively in your favour, especially in a one word against another type case.

 

How else do you think those people get off when two people are high on drugs crash as car into someone, kill them, are both caught at the scene, but then get off because they both deny they were driving and the police can’t prove conclusively which one it was (and that’s just low grade chav cunning, not top draw legal techicalism).

 

On the two points above, I was referring to case with a woman with bruises and witnesses to an assault. You are referring to a case of 'one word against another' backed by a good lawyer. There is an obvious difference here, which is what I have been alluding to all along. Again, in my opinion, a flashy lawyer could never get some off an assault charge given the evidence (O.J. withstanding ).

 

See you give a perfect example in your own answer, in the latest case it was a question of 2 vs 2, his defence was based around undermining the witnesses (which given they were young, drunk at the time and probably somewhat after a bit of fame probably wasn't the hardest thing ever).

 

Still given what Bellamy admitted saying and doing (which wasn't assault) but IS him admitting he's basically a complete twat if that's his behaviour, again I can't see what your issue is.

 

 

I would imagine the car crash thing is down to there being no independant witnesses (quite different from a nightclub setting), although, I would be surprised there was no way of proving who was driving given current forensics. Is this a recent case?

 

Both HAD been driving that car that evening so both had prints on the wheel, there was no evidence as to who had been driving at the fatal moment, yes it's pretty recent a year or so, in fact there have been a couple of cases like that in the last 10 years.

 

In a related sense it’s why they had to alter speeding legislation after that chief constable “forgot” who it was that was driving his car a 100+mph and so none was charged (now the licence holder gets it if no can remember who was driving – even if they licence holder was no where near the car or the country at the time).

 

I will respectfully decline comment on the rest of your post as you don't seem to grasp that on a public forum anyone has the right to question someone else's use of words

 

Yep and you don't seem to grasp that my opinion of the vindictive little dwarf (with a twisted personality and vile temperament) has little to do with you right to love and happiness (or something).

[IrishMag 0]

He's been told to find another club

[Baggio 0]

Source?