One for Parky

[Park Life 71]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

[Renton 22412]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

 

The BBC are complicit in those ones.

[Guest alex]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

Yah dun say a ting

[Park Life 71]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

Yah dun say a ting

 

I love the way Renton can't leave this thread alone.

 

It will be back when I'm in the mood don't worry.

[Renton 22412]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

Yah dun say a ting

 

I love the way Renton can't leave this thread alone.

 

It will be back when I'm in the mood don't worry.

 

The thread was partly about a BBC2 TV series, I was merely giving an update.

 

If you want to list the loony theories you believe in we can deal with them one by one though.

[Park Life 71]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

Yah dun say a ting

 

I love the way Renton can't leave this thread alone.

 

It will be back when I'm in the mood don't worry.

 

The thread was partly about a BBC2 TV series, I was merely giving an update.

 

If you want to list the loony theories you believe in we can deal with them one by one though.

 

"I'm not an elephant I'm a human being"..

[Renton 22412]

you'll have to tell me a bit more detail about the Merrick conspiracy before I comment.

[Park Life 71]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

Yah dun say a ting

 

I love the way Renton can't leave this thread alone.

 

It will be back when I'm in the mood don't worry.

 

The thread was partly about a BBC2 TV series, I was merely giving an update.

 

If you want to list the loony theories you believe in we can deal with them one by one though.

 

JFK - Undecided.

Marilyn - Suicide.

9/11- More hands at the pump than admitted.

Moon Landings - Faked or semi-faked.

Bay of Pigs - Proven conspiracy.

Diana- Murky goings on beforehand as well as her prophecy of her own death...."Breaks tampered with fear in letter".

Enron - Proven conspiracy to de-fraud aided and abetted by accountants now bankcrupt.

Edited March 7, 2007 by Parky

[Guest alex]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

[Rob W 0]

what was the "conspiracy" over the Bay of Pigs Parky???

 

the Yanks admitted they were behinnd it straight off

 

 

Unless of course it was a RUSSIAN conspiracy

 

 

PS I've just noticed aaall these "conspiracies" except Diana are AMERICAN

- hmmmm- couldn't be due to the fact they are all idiots could it??

[Park Life 71]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

 

This is summat people are mystifyied about:

 

 

 

"They should have been fried"

Then of course there is always the question of exactly how did the Apollo ships make it to the moon? Outer space is a minefield of deadly radiation emanating from solar flares emitted by the sun. Your average astronaut (like those responsible for fixing the Hubble telescope) orbits the earth in near space and are protected by the Earth's Van Allen belt. The moon though, is 240,000 miles distant and lies way outside this safe band. Astronomical data shows that during the Apollo flights 1,485 such flares occurred. It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil." Now, even giving NASA the benefit of the doubt (well it is almost Christmas and I'm in a generous mood), if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why as Rene asks, weren't such miracle suits used by rescue workers as protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown which released only a fraction of the dose the astronauts would have encountered?! Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the moon when a big flare started. As Rene rather eloquently puts it: "they should have been fried.""

Edited March 7, 2007 by Parky

[Guest alex]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

I don't think you gave an answer last time. Not a one to the question anyway. And look, you've done the same again.

Edited March 8, 2007 by alex

[luckyluke 2]

Oklahoma bombing. May have been a bit of a cover up here, certainly more feasible and plausible than the other conspiracy theories we've discussed. Having said that, I'm not convinced there was and don't really care.

 

The series has ended without investigating Dianna, moonlandings, JFK or Marilyn. This naturally adds weight to these conspiracy theories.

 

What yah saying like?

Yah dun say a ting

 

I love the way Renton can't leave this thread alone.

 

It will be back when I'm in the mood don't worry.

 

The thread was partly about a BBC2 TV series, I was merely giving an update.

 

If you want to list the loony theories you believe in we can deal with them one by one though.

 

JFK - Undecided.

Marilyn - Suicide.

9/11- More hands at the pump than admitted.

Moon Landings - Faked or semi-faked.

Bay of Pigs - Proven conspiracy.

Diana- Murky goings on beforehand as well as her prophecy of her own death...."Breaks tampered with fear in letter".

Enron - Proven conspiracy to de-fraud aided and abetted by accountants now bankcrupt.

 

I think he's dead.

[Renton 22412]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

 

This is summat people are mystifyied about:

 

 

 

"They should have been fried"

Then of course there is always the question of exactly how did the Apollo ships make it to the moon? Outer space is a minefield of deadly radiation emanating from solar flares emitted by the sun. Your average astronaut (like those responsible for fixing the Hubble telescope) orbits the earth in near space and are protected by the Earth's Van Allen belt. The moon though, is 240,000 miles distant and lies way outside this safe band. Astronomical data shows that during the Apollo flights 1,485 such flares occurred. It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil." Now, even giving NASA the benefit of the doubt (well it is almost Christmas and I'm in a generous mood), if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why as Rene asks, weren't such miracle suits used by rescue workers as protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown which released only a fraction of the dose the astronauts would have encountered?! Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the moon when a big flare started. As Rene rather eloquently puts it: "they should have been fried.""

 

That article doesn't even get the basics right, the Van Allen belts were supposedly the cause of fatal radiation to astronauts, not protective of it. Bearing this in mind, how can you take it seriously?

 

Of course, the fact that every reputable biophysicist in the world disputes that short exposure to this radiation is dangerous, including Van Allen himself before his death, seems to slip the minds of the Parky loons.

[Guest alex]

Wonder why the link wasn't provided.

[Park Life 71]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

 

This is summat people are mystifyied about:

 

 

 

"They should have been fried"

Then of course there is always the question of exactly how did the Apollo ships make it to the moon? Outer space is a minefield of deadly radiation emanating from solar flares emitted by the sun. Your average astronaut (like those responsible for fixing the Hubble telescope) orbits the earth in near space and are protected by the Earth's Van Allen belt. The moon though, is 240,000 miles distant and lies way outside this safe band. Astronomical data shows that during the Apollo flights 1,485 such flares occurred. It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil." Now, even giving NASA the benefit of the doubt (well it is almost Christmas and I'm in a generous mood), if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why as Rene asks, weren't such miracle suits used by rescue workers as protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown which released only a fraction of the dose the astronauts would have encountered?! Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the moon when a big flare started. As Rene rather eloquently puts it: "they should have been fried.""

 

That article doesn't even get the basics right, the Van Allen belts were supposedly the cause of fatal radiation to astronauts, not protective of it. Bearing this in mind, how can you take it seriously?

 

Of course, the fact that every reputable biophysicist in the world disputes that short exposure to this radiation is dangerous, including Van Allen himself before his death, seems to slip the minds of the Parky loons.

 

Yes but it blocks dangerous solar radiation from the sun.

[Park Life 71]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

I don't think you gave an answer last time. Not a one to the question anyway. And look, you've done the same again.

 

I'll deal with you later.

[Guest alex]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

I don't think you gave an answer last time. Not a one to the question anyway. And look, you've done the same again.

 

I'll deal with you later.

Happy googling

[Renton 22412]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

I don't think you gave an answer last time. Not a one to the question anyway. And look, you've done the same again.

 

I'll deal with you later.

Happy googling

 

[Guest alex]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

 

This is summat people are mystifyied about:

 

 

 

"They should have been fried"

Then of course there is always the question of exactly how did the Apollo ships make it to the moon? Outer space is a minefield of deadly radiation emanating from solar flares emitted by the sun. Your average astronaut (like those responsible for fixing the Hubble telescope) orbits the earth in near space and are protected by the Earth's Van Allen belt. The moon though, is 240,000 miles distant and lies way outside this safe band. Astronomical data shows that during the Apollo flights 1,485 such flares occurred. It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil." Now, even giving NASA the benefit of the doubt (well it is almost Christmas and I'm in a generous mood), if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why as Rene asks, weren't such miracle suits used by rescue workers as protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown which released only a fraction of the dose the astronauts would have encountered?! Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the moon when a big flare started. As Rene rather eloquently puts it: "they should have been fried.""

 

That article doesn't even get the basics right, the Van Allen belts were supposedly the cause of fatal radiation to astronauts, not protective of it. Bearing this in mind, how can you take it seriously?

 

Of course, the fact that every reputable biophysicist in the world disputes that short exposure to this radiation is dangerous, including Van Allen himself before his death, seems to slip the minds of the Parky loons.

 

Yes but it blocks dangerous solar radiation from the sun.

Never heard that before. Source?

[Park Life 71]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

 

This is summat people are mystifyied about:

 

 

 

"They should have been fried"

Then of course there is always the question of exactly how did the Apollo ships make it to the moon? Outer space is a minefield of deadly radiation emanating from solar flares emitted by the sun. Your average astronaut (like those responsible for fixing the Hubble telescope) orbits the earth in near space and are protected by the Earth's Van Allen belt. The moon though, is 240,000 miles distant and lies way outside this safe band. Astronomical data shows that during the Apollo flights 1,485 such flares occurred. It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil." Now, even giving NASA the benefit of the doubt (well it is almost Christmas and I'm in a generous mood), if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why as Rene asks, weren't such miracle suits used by rescue workers as protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown which released only a fraction of the dose the astronauts would have encountered?! Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the moon when a big flare started. As Rene rather eloquently puts it: "they should have been fried.""

 

That article doesn't even get the basics right, the Van Allen belts were supposedly the cause of fatal radiation to astronauts, not protective of it. Bearing this in mind, how can you take it seriously?

 

Of course, the fact that every reputable biophysicist in the world disputes that short exposure to this radiation is dangerous, including Van Allen himself before his death, seems to slip the minds of the Parky loons.

 

Yes but it blocks dangerous solar radiation from the sun.

Never heard that before. Source?

 

Just tap it into wiki ffs!!

[Guest alex]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

 

This is summat people are mystifyied about:

 

 

 

"They should have been fried"

Then of course there is always the question of exactly how did the Apollo ships make it to the moon? Outer space is a minefield of deadly radiation emanating from solar flares emitted by the sun. Your average astronaut (like those responsible for fixing the Hubble telescope) orbits the earth in near space and are protected by the Earth's Van Allen belt. The moon though, is 240,000 miles distant and lies way outside this safe band. Astronomical data shows that during the Apollo flights 1,485 such flares occurred. It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil." Now, even giving NASA the benefit of the doubt (well it is almost Christmas and I'm in a generous mood), if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why as Rene asks, weren't such miracle suits used by rescue workers as protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown which released only a fraction of the dose the astronauts would have encountered?! Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the moon when a big flare started. As Rene rather eloquently puts it: "they should have been fried.""

 

That article doesn't even get the basics right, the Van Allen belts were supposedly the cause of fatal radiation to astronauts, not protective of it. Bearing this in mind, how can you take it seriously?

 

Of course, the fact that every reputable biophysicist in the world disputes that short exposure to this radiation is dangerous, including Van Allen himself before his death, seems to slip the minds of the Parky loons.

 

Yes but it blocks dangerous solar radiation from the sun.

Never heard that before. Source?

 

Just tap it into wiki ffs!!

So I have to research your patter now do I? No thanks.

[Park Life 71]

I'll ask this again Parky? Was the Soviet Union in on the moon landings fake? It's just I can't see them (after they tracked the goings on so closely, etc.) going along with it. What with it being just about the height of the Cold War.

 

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave last year.

 

 

This is summat people are mystifyied about:

 

 

 

"They should have been fried"

Then of course there is always the question of exactly how did the Apollo ships make it to the moon? Outer space is a minefield of deadly radiation emanating from solar flares emitted by the sun. Your average astronaut (like those responsible for fixing the Hubble telescope) orbits the earth in near space and are protected by the Earth's Van Allen belt. The moon though, is 240,000 miles distant and lies way outside this safe band. Astronomical data shows that during the Apollo flights 1,485 such flares occurred. It is the belief of John Mauldin, a physicist who works for NASA, that in order to be protected from the radiation, shielding at least 2 metres thick would be required. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moon surfaces were according to NASA "about the thickness of heavy duty aluminium foil." Now, even giving NASA the benefit of the doubt (well it is almost Christmas and I'm in a generous mood), if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why as Rene asks, weren't such miracle suits used by rescue workers as protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown which released only a fraction of the dose the astronauts would have encountered?! Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the moon when a big flare started. As Rene rather eloquently puts it: "they should have been fried.""

 

That article doesn't even get the basics right, the Van Allen belts were supposedly the cause of fatal radiation to astronauts, not protective of it. Bearing this in mind, how can you take it seriously?

 

Of course, the fact that every reputable biophysicist in the world disputes that short exposure to this radiation is dangerous, including Van Allen himself before his death, seems to slip the minds of the Parky loons.

 

Yes but it blocks dangerous solar radiation from the sun.

Never heard that before. Source?

 

Just tap it into wiki ffs!!

So I have to research your patter now do I? No thanks.

 

I'm shocked at your lack of cosmology....Where is my tuition fees??

[Renton 22412]

What's it got to do with cosmology?

[Park Life 71]

What's it got to do with cosmology?

 

 

http://srag.jsc.nasa.gov/SpaceRadiation/What/What.cfm

 

Galactic Cosmic Radiation (GCR)

Galactic cosmic radiation originates outside the solar system. It consists of ionized atoms ranging from a single proton up to an uranium nucleus. The flux (rate of flow) levels of these particles is very low. However, since they travel very close to the speed of light, and because some of them are composed of very heavy elements such as iron, they produce intense ionization as they pass through matter.

For the most part, the Earth's magnetic field provides shielding for spacecraft from galactic cosmic radiation. However, cosmic rays have free access over the polar regions where the magnetic field lines are open to interplanetary space.

Edited March 8, 2007 by Parky