Super_Steve_Howey 0 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Did you see this one then Parky? For one hour, I thought it did a pretty good job of debunking the conspiracies surrounding 9/11. If you didn't see it, well, I guess that'll help you, keep taking the medicine. I watched it and for me it didnt deal well enough with one of the major events in the story, namely that its likely that they brought flight 93 down instead of letting it hit its intended target. Quite plausible that the government would cover this up afterwards as it wouldnt have been very palatable for the public. Thats the only event in the story that is a bit suspect. Everything else, its fairly clear what happened. However, the film dealt with the one of the more minor events very badly. That wasnt really even an event, it was whether the CIA knew that the al qaeda operatives were in the US and whether they knew what they were planning. If they did, they should have told the local FBI and they should have acted. The film last night explained that 'the CIA and FBI are 2 big organisation and the CIA gave the FBI the information but the FBI, what with it being a big organisation and all, failed to act on this information'. That was poor imo, the film concludes that the US were guilty of intelligence failures like with WMD not a conspiracy. I felt that the possiblilty the CIA knew what was happening and let it happen anyway as still 'un-investigated'. Building 7 was still a mystery after the film too. I can't see how bringing flight 93 down would be a hard pill to swallow. Pretty sure the public would have accepted it knowing the damage the other 3 planes had caused. As I remember, one of the bombers was on a CIA watchlist when he entered, and surveilance was initiated, but he was lost while he was in the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 (edited) I happen to know one or two things about the insurance and the funny goings on....No point in going into it because a) I will be open to ridicule. You're all too stupid to understand the finer points. (Avoids using condascending smiley). *Changes mind* Edited February 19, 2007 by Parky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Which part? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Which part? The whole thing. Jet fuel burns off very vast and would have been totally unable to sustain a fire of the required heat for the length of time to melt steel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 There is strong evidence that Thermite may have been used to bring down the towers. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 There is strong evidence that Thermite may have been used to bring down the towers. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.htm Let's be clear...Finkelstein basically purchased and insured and then re-insured (doubling the cover) a building complex which they had been unable to sell for 10 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Wherever you may go Park Life I shall always been in the shadows with a picture of Cancer Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Wherever you may go Park Life I shall always been in the shadows with a picture of Cancer Man. Somehow it makes me feel safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Which part? The whole thing. Jet fuel burns off very vast and would have been totally unable to sustain a fire of the required heat for the length of time to melt steel. I agree with you by the way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Which part? The whole thing. Jet fuel burns off very vast and would have been totally unable to sustain a fire of the required heat for the length of time to melt steel. I agree with you by the way Fires were burning at temperatures of 1000 degree's C weeks after the "attacks", thats a text book example of Thermite rather than aviation fuel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Which part? The whole thing. Jet fuel burns off very vast and would have been totally unable to sustain a fire of the required heat for the length of time to melt steel. I agree with you by the way Fires were burning at temperatures of 1000 degree's C weeks after the "attacks", thats a text book example of Thermite rather than aviation fuel. Have I read this thread wrong? Thought most people were saying it was as the US told us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Which part? The whole thing. Jet fuel burns off very vast and would have been totally unable to sustain a fire of the required heat for the length of time to melt steel. I agree with you by the way Fires were burning at temperatures of 1000 degree's C weeks after the "attacks", thats a text book example of Thermite rather than aviation fuel. Have I read this thread wrong? Thought most people were saying it was as the US told us? I'm open minded regarding the theories regarding 911, I'm just not arrogant enough to say that one argument is right or wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 48050 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Sounds to me like you conspiracy theorists have got the whole thing sussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Sounds to me like you conspiracy theorists have got the whole thing sussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Sounds to me like you conspiracy theorists have got the whole thing sussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14026 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I blame the ethnic minorties. All of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 48050 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 So had they planted the bombs and then someone just happened to fly the plane into the building? Or did they use the planes in lieu of a detonation device? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Parky believes that the towers were brought down by controlled explosion iirc. Nope, in fact they were the first 3 buildings ever to fall into their own footprint because of a fire. Not only was it a fire, but it was the hottest fire known to man, able to melt all of the steel in the towers. Amazing stuff Quelle suprise! Which part? The whole thing. Jet fuel burns off very vast and would have been totally unable to sustain a fire of the required heat for the length of time to melt steel. I agree with you by the way Fires were burning at temperatures of 1000 degree's C weeks after the "attacks", thats a text book example of Thermite rather than aviation fuel. Have I read this thread wrong? Thought most people were saying it was as the US told us? I'm open minded regarding the theories regarding 911, I'm just not arrogant enough to say that one argument is right or wrong. Same here. Sitting on the fence is the best option in these situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 So had they planted the bombs and then someone just happened to fly the plane into the building? Or did they use the planes in lieu of a detonation device? No need for a detonation device if thermite is used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 48050 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 So had they planted the bombs and then someone just happened to fly the plane into the building? Or did they use the planes in lieu of a detonation device? No need for a detonation device if thermite is used. Termites can't chew through steel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 So had they planted the bombs and then someone just happened to fly the plane into the building? Or did they use the planes in lieu of a detonation device? No need for a detonation device if thermite is used. Termites can't chew through steel. George Bush had a special thermite termite camp in Texas for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now