One for Parky

[Park Life 71]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know 'they' own the media.

Edited February 20, 2007 by Parky

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

 

Perhaps because a similar event has never happened?

 

Passenger jets rarely hit buildings, even less so at that trajectory. The Pentagon is possibly unique in its design and construction.

[Park Life 71]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

 

 

It would be ridiculous if it was on Columbo even.

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

You haven't said anything.

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 4086]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

 

Perhaps because a similar event has never happened?

 

Passenger jets rarely hit buildings, even less so at that trajectory. The Pentagon is possibly unique in its design and construction.

 

Yes but they crash often and always leave a lot of wreckage and bags strewn all over the place.

[Guest alex]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

[Park Life 71]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

You haven't said anything.

 

That's good then.

[Guest alex]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

You haven't said anything.

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

 

Perhaps because a similar event has never happened?

 

Passenger jets rarely hit buildings, even less so at that trajectory. The Pentagon is possibly unique in its design and construction.

 

Yes but they crash often and always leave a lot of wreckage and bags strewn all over the place.

 

Which crash are you comparing it to then?

[Park Life 71]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

[Guest alex]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know 'they' own the media.

So, they don't appear anywhere else that you know of then?

[Guest alex]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

I just meant everyone said they saw a plane fly into a building.

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

 

And how many eye-witness accounts are used to support your questions?

[Park Life 71]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know 'they' own the media.

So, they don't appear anywhere else that you know of then?

 

No.But why would it....? No Lloyds broker or other consultant involved in this is going to go to the media and say they ain't ganna pay because of x y z are they? That is not the way it works. Insurance companies quietly re-build they're positions and alter their policies to better protect themselves in future. As they have done....with regards to terrorist acts.

[Park Life 71]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

 

And how many eye-witness accounts are used to support your questions?

 

Steve it must be so easy for you just laboriously and religiously following the official story....Have a little fun fella..

[Park Life 71]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

I just meant everyone said they saw a plane fly into a building.

 

The pentagon?

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 4086]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

 

Perhaps because a similar event has never happened?

 

Passenger jets rarely hit buildings, even less so at that trajectory. The Pentagon is possibly unique in its design and construction.

 

Yes but they crash often and always leave a lot of wreckage and bags strewn all over the place.

 

Which crash are you comparing it to then?

 

This is a good site. Note the gouged earth.

 

http://www2.indystar.com/library/factfiles...anecrashes.html

Edited February 20, 2007 by Kevin Carr's Gloves

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know 'they' own the media.

So, they don't appear anywhere else that you know of then?

 

No.But why would it....? No Lloyds broker or other consultant involved in this is going to go to the media and say they ain't ganna pay because of x y z are they? That is not the way it works. Insurance companies quietly re-build they're positions and alter their policies to better protect themselves in future. As they have done....with regards to terrorist acts.

 

Isn't that what any insurance company would do in the event of a large payout?

 

Are you seriously not even going to allude to the basics of your info, but still claim evidence of wrong-doing?

[Guest alex]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

 

And how many eye-witness accounts are used to support your questions?

 

Steve it must be so easy for you just laboriously and religiously following the official story....Have a little fun fella..

The thing is though Parky, he's shown in this thread that he knows what he's on about, he's more or less answered your questions while asking you questions you can't answer and he hasn't had to resort to making up an anecdote about meeting someone 'in the know' yet either.

[Guest alex]

Can these supposed irregularities about the insurance be sourced anywhere other than conspiracy sites/message board hearsay though? Because I would have expected the media to have picked up on it but I've only ever heard about it on here or N-O.

 

I can't say anymore than I have Al. But when we meet I'll tell you the whole story.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know 'they' own the media.

So, they don't appear anywhere else that you know of then?

 

No.

All I wanted to know. However you dress it up, your argument is based on stuff you and others claim to know or is just made up but can't back up.

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

 

And how many eye-witness accounts are used to support your questions?

 

Steve it must be so easy for you just laboriously and religiously following the official story....Have a little fun fella..

 

Not at all.

 

It is quite easy however to point out that theorists will put different weight on the same evidence, i.e. eye-witness accounts, dependant on whether they support their questions or not

[Park Life 71]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

 

And how many eye-witness accounts are used to support your questions?

 

Steve it must be so easy for you just laboriously and religiously following the official story....Have a little fun fella..

The thing is though Parky, he's shown in this thread that he knows what he's on about, he's more or less answered your questions while asking you questions you can't answer and he hasn't had to resort to making up an anecdote about meeting someone 'in the know' yet either.

 

He's just regurgitated the official story. And he hasn't answered many of my (and others questions). Ie A fire near the top of a building and how this would collapse the steel in the bottom of the building....Even in the official report (some of which I've read and I doubt you or Stevie have) this is gossed over with phrases about conductive heat energy and transferance....All cobblers you undrstand.

 

WHY NO INDEPENDANT INQUIRY??

 

 

.......I'm not talking about 'good old boy' senators and friends of the Bush family either...

 

I really think its hilarious that people beleive this whole story as it has been portrayed....So full of holes it is.

[Park Life 71]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

The many eyewitnesses who saw it happen make it believable enough to me.

 

This isn't so, there were many contradictory eye witness reports inc a small passenger jet and even a military aircraft..Some even described the high pitched whine of a missile. Police will always tell you that under pressure in these split second moments eye witnesses often haven't a clue what they really saw.

 

And how many eye-witness accounts are used to support your questions?

 

Steve it must be so easy for you just laboriously and religiously following the official story....Have a little fun fella..

 

Not at all.

 

It is quite easy however to point out that theorists will put different weight on the same evidence, i.e. eye-witness accounts, dependant on whether they support their questions or not

 

Agreed.

 

Some say 'planes' didn't even hit the towers...

[Gemmill 47102]

Parky spits out the word "official" as if it's a swear word. "That's right, you go on believing the official story. Me and my friends at www.conspiracynutcases.com know what really happened."

 

[Super_Steve_Howey 0]

The one conspiracy theory about the whole thing is the Pentagon hit. Never seen a plane leave such a neat whole and no wreckage before.

 

Perhaps because a similar event has never happened?

 

Passenger jets rarely hit buildings, even less so at that trajectory. The Pentagon is possibly unique in its design and construction.

 

Yes but they crash often and always leave a lot of wreckage and bags strewn all over the place.

 

Which crash are you comparing it to then?

 

This is a good site. Note the gouged earth.

 

http://www2.indystar.com/library/factfiles...anecrashes.html

 

Note the gouged earth.

 

Why?

 

 

Is there an incident on that site of a large passeneger jet hitting a heavily reinforced building in the side?

 

On the front page I see passenger jets crashing into the ground, and fighter jets and small aircraft hitting non-reinforced buildlings.