Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 DNA analysis of the blood found in, on, and near Simpson's Bronco revealed traces of Simpson's, Nicole's, and Ronald Goldman's blood. DNA analysis of bloody socks found in Simpson's bedroom showed the blood to be Nicole's. Simpson's hair was found on Goldman's shirt even though Simpson claimed not to have been at the home and never to have met Goldman. DNA analysis of blood on the gloves was proven to be a mixture of Simpson's, Nicole's, and Ronald Goldman's. The gloves also contained particles of Goldman's hair and carpet fibers from Simpson's Bronco. Arrest records indicate that Simpson had been charged with the beating of his wife Nicole. Photos of Nicole's bruised and battered face emerged. Simpson was sentenced to 3 years of community service for the crime. Police discovered that the dome light in the Bronco had been removed. A search of the vehicle revealed the light was carefully placed under the passenger seat and was in good working condition. Puzzling blood smears on the passenger floorboard indicated that Simpson may have purposely removed the light and placed it under the seat before the murders (assuming he had indeed murdered Brown Simpson and Goldman). Then after the murders he may have unsuccessfully tried to find it to put it back in the socket. Police on stakeouts routinely remove the dome lights from their vehicles to avoid detection when the car doors are opened. It was discovered that one set of keys to Nicole Brown Simpson's home were missing. She had indicated to several family members and friends that she feared Simpson had stolen them to gain entry into her home. The keys were later found in Simpson's home. Paula Barbieri indicated that she had broken up with Simpson the day of the murders. She indicated he seemed very disturbed at the news. Phone records proved that Simpson attempted to contact her shortly before the murders from his Bronco's cellular phone. The left-hand glove found at Nicole's home and the right-hand glove found at O.J.'s home proved to be a match. They were also proven to be Simpson's size. Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves. Bloody footprints in Nicole's home were identified as being made from a pair of Bruno Magli shoes. These shoes are expensive and rare. The size 12 prints match Simpson's shoe size. Simpson claims under oath that he does not own such shoes and in fact indicates that he thinks they "are ugly." A photograph was introduced showing Simpson wearing the exact shoes at an NFL football game. Simpson claimed under oath that the photo is a forgery and is backed up by an expert witness. Later, another photo taken by a different source, also showed Simpson wearing the same shoes at another NFL football game. Friends and family indicated that Nicole claimed that Simpson had been stalking her. She said that everywhere she went she saw Simpson there watching her. She was afraid because Simpson had already told her he would kill her if he ever found her with another man. Ross Cutlery provided store receipts indicating Simpson had purchased a 12-inch Stiletto knife six weeks before the murders. A replica of the knife was purchased by the police and provided an exact match to the wounds on Nicole and Ronald Goldman. GUILTY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 Five minutes on Wikipedia and I know the bloke* is guilty, why even bother with a legal system? *These two are obviously guilty of crimes against fashion and possibly humanity, but in this case I'm referring to Simpson. I've heard that when Sammy got his highlights done, in an homage to Jonny Cochrane he would turn up at his CPS calls and announce "If the representation has higlights, you may not indict." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 DNA analysis of the blood found in, on, and near Simpson's Bronco revealed traces of Simpson's, Nicole's, and Ronald Goldman's blood. DNA analysis of bloody socks found in Simpson's bedroom showed the blood to be Nicole's. Simpson's hair was found on Goldman's shirt even though Simpson claimed not to have been at the home and never to have met Goldman. DNA analysis of blood on the gloves was proven to be a mixture of Simpson's, Nicole's, and Ronald Goldman's. The gloves also contained particles of Goldman's hair and carpet fibers from Simpson's Bronco. Arrest records indicate that Simpson had been charged with the beating of his wife Nicole. Photos of Nicole's bruised and battered face emerged. Simpson was sentenced to 3 years of community service for the crime. Police discovered that the dome light in the Bronco had been removed. A search of the vehicle revealed the light was carefully placed under the passenger seat and was in good working condition. Puzzling blood smears on the passenger floorboard indicated that Simpson may have purposely removed the light and placed it under the seat before the murders (assuming he had indeed murdered Brown Simpson and Goldman). Then after the murders he may have unsuccessfully tried to find it to put it back in the socket. Police on stakeouts routinely remove the dome lights from their vehicles to avoid detection when the car doors are opened. It was discovered that one set of keys to Nicole Brown Simpson's home were missing. She had indicated to several family members and friends that she feared Simpson had stolen them to gain entry into her home. The keys were later found in Simpson's home. Paula Barbieri indicated that she had broken up with Simpson the day of the murders. She indicated he seemed very disturbed at the news. Phone records proved that Simpson attempted to contact her shortly before the murders from his Bronco's cellular phone. The left-hand glove found at Nicole's home and the right-hand glove found at O.J.'s home proved to be a match. They were also proven to be Simpson's size. Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves. Bloody footprints in Nicole's home were identified as being made from a pair of Bruno Magli shoes. These shoes are expensive and rare. The size 12 prints match Simpson's shoe size. Simpson claims under oath that he does not own such shoes and in fact indicates that he thinks they "are ugly." A photograph was introduced showing Simpson wearing the exact shoes at an NFL football game. Simpson claimed under oath that the photo is a forgery and is backed up by an expert witness. Later, another photo taken by a different source, also showed Simpson wearing the same shoes at another NFL football game. Friends and family indicated that Nicole claimed that Simpson had been stalking her. She said that everywhere she went she saw Simpson there watching her. She was afraid because Simpson had already told her he would kill her if he ever found her with another man. Ross Cutlery provided store receipts indicating Simpson had purchased a 12-inch Stiletto knife six weeks before the murders. A replica of the knife was purchased by the police and provided an exact match to the wounds on Nicole and Ronald Goldman. GUILTY! "If it doesnt fit, you must acquit!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 DNA analysis of the blood found in, on, and near Simpson's Bronco revealed traces of Simpson's, Nicole's, and Ronald Goldman's blood. DNA analysis of bloody socks found in Simpson's bedroom showed the blood to be Nicole's. Simpson's hair was found on Goldman's shirt even though Simpson claimed not to have been at the home and never to have met Goldman. DNA analysis of blood on the gloves was proven to be a mixture of Simpson's, Nicole's, and Ronald Goldman's. The gloves also contained particles of Goldman's hair and carpet fibers from Simpson's Bronco. Arrest records indicate that Simpson had been charged with the beating of his wife Nicole. Photos of Nicole's bruised and battered face emerged. Simpson was sentenced to 3 years of community service for the crime. Police discovered that the dome light in the Bronco had been removed. A search of the vehicle revealed the light was carefully placed under the passenger seat and was in good working condition. Puzzling blood smears on the passenger floorboard indicated that Simpson may have purposely removed the light and placed it under the seat before the murders (assuming he had indeed murdered Brown Simpson and Goldman). Then after the murders he may have unsuccessfully tried to find it to put it back in the socket. Police on stakeouts routinely remove the dome lights from their vehicles to avoid detection when the car doors are opened. It was discovered that one set of keys to Nicole Brown Simpson's home were missing. She had indicated to several family members and friends that she feared Simpson had stolen them to gain entry into her home. The keys were later found in Simpson's home. Paula Barbieri indicated that she had broken up with Simpson the day of the murders. She indicated he seemed very disturbed at the news. Phone records proved that Simpson attempted to contact her shortly before the murders from his Bronco's cellular phone. The left-hand glove found at Nicole's home and the right-hand glove found at O.J.'s home proved to be a match. They were also proven to be Simpson's size. Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves. Bloody footprints in Nicole's home were identified as being made from a pair of Bruno Magli shoes. These shoes are expensive and rare. The size 12 prints match Simpson's shoe size. Simpson claims under oath that he does not own such shoes and in fact indicates that he thinks they "are ugly." A photograph was introduced showing Simpson wearing the exact shoes at an NFL football game. Simpson claimed under oath that the photo is a forgery and is backed up by an expert witness. Later, another photo taken by a different source, also showed Simpson wearing the same shoes at another NFL football game. Friends and family indicated that Nicole claimed that Simpson had been stalking her. She said that everywhere she went she saw Simpson there watching her. She was afraid because Simpson had already told her he would kill her if he ever found her with another man. Ross Cutlery provided store receipts indicating Simpson had purchased a 12-inch Stiletto knife six weeks before the murders. A replica of the knife was purchased by the police and provided an exact match to the wounds on Nicole and Ronald Goldman. GUILTY! You're just like LM! A few rumours that back your argument, and he's guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 Five minutes on Wikipedia and I know the bloke* is guilty, why even bother with a legal system? *These two are obviously guilty of crimes against fashion and possibly humanity, but in this case I'm referring to Simpson. I've heard that when Sammy got his highlights done, in an homage to Jonny Cochrane he would turn up at his CPS calls and announce "If the representation has higlights, you may not indict." "It's semi-perm, you must adjourn!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 "Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves." That does it for me, like, everything else he can maybe put down to a vast and unlikely conspiracy, but there's basically only one reason he would lie about that. Would love to know his response to the pictures, "Oh gloves, I thought you asked if I had a beard." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 "Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves." That does it for me, like, everything else he can maybe put down to a vast and unlikely conspiracy, but there's basically only one reason he would lie about that. Would love to know his response to the pictures, "Oh gloves, I thought you asked if I had a beard." "If I owned them gloves I'd hold my hands up!" *raises hands in pair of Aris Isotoner gloves* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 "If I owned them gloves I'd hold my hands up!" *raises hands in pair of Aris Isotoner gloves* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 I think his reaction directly after the murder was quite damning too like And didn't they temporarily halt the NBA All-Star game to go live to the police chase? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 "Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves." That does it for me, like, everything else he can maybe put down to a vast and unlikely conspiracy, but there's basically only one reason he would lie about that. Would love to know his response to the pictures, "Oh gloves, I thought you asked if I had a beard." How did the jury manage to completely disregard that though? He then lied about owning the shoes that had left prints at the scene only for them to produce photos of him wearing them. He then claimed the photo had been doctored only for an alternative source to produce similar photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 Aris should think about getting John Barnes in to do an advert for those gloves though. "I-so-ton-er". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 "Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves." That does it for me, like, everything else he can maybe put down to a vast and unlikely conspiracy, but there's basically only one reason he would lie about that. Would love to know his response to the pictures, "Oh gloves, I thought you asked if I had a beard." How did the jury manage to completely disregard that though? He then lied about owning the shoes that had left prints at the scene only for them to produce photos of him wearing them. He then claimed the photo had been doctored only for an alternative source to produce similar photos. "If it doesn't fit you must acquit!" tbh. In the context of alleged police misconduct (corruption if true) and against the backdrop of Rodney King. Politics at the end of the day. The law is very definitely an ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 "Even though Simpson claimed under oath that he did not own a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves, several media pictures emerged showing Simpson wearing these exact gloves." That does it for me, like, everything else he can maybe put down to a vast and unlikely conspiracy, but there's basically only one reason he would lie about that. Would love to know his response to the pictures, "Oh gloves, I thought you asked if I had a beard." How did the jury manage to completely disregard that though? He then lied about owning the shoes that had left prints at the scene only for them to produce photos of him wearing them. He then claimed the photo had been doctored only for an alternative source to produce similar photos. "If it doesn't fit you must acquit!" tbh. In the context of alleged police misconduct (corruption if true) and against the backdrop of Rodney King. Politics at the end of the day. The law is very definitely an ass. Peter Kay referenced that during the ice cream wars (That Peter Kay Thing) when asked to move on by a policeman after he had set up his ice cream van following a minor RTA in order to catch the crowd of onlookers I thought it was funny, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30221 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit!" OJ, his lawyer and the police=biggest joke of all time. Black America went mental celebrating his acquittal an'all. Crazy people. Especially considering OJ didn't give a fuck about 'his people' to the extent all his friends (and his wife) were white. EDIT: Remember OJ's lawyer on South Park? That episode is genius. Pure genius. Johnnie Cochran is a complete dick. Isn't the lawyer/attorney in Seinfeld a spoof of this guy too? Speaking of Seinfeld: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6167920.stm Naughty naughty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30221 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit!" OJ, his lawyer and the police=biggest joke of all time. Black America went mental celebrating his acquittal an'all. Crazy people. Especially considering OJ didn't give a fuck about 'his people' to the extent all his friends (and his wife) were white. EDIT: Remember OJ's lawyer on South Park? That episode is genius. Pure genius. Johnnie Cochran is a complete dick. Isn't the lawyer/attorney in Seinfeld a spoof of this guy too? Speaking of Seinfeld: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6167920.stm Naughty naughty! He's 57?? What did he say to them anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 http://www.dailymotion.com/visited/search/..._americanfreche Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 Transcript please. I can't get streaming media at work. Is it worse than what I said to aimaad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 Transcript please. I can't get streaming media at work. Is it worse than what I said to aimaad? It's a blatant over-reaction from the industry to cover for their no doubt equally racist selves. Jerry seinfeld is a cock, that's all I got out of this story. It looks kind of like he went into shock comedy mode and then realised he had no where to go and was just standing on a stage shouting "nigger"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30221 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 Sounds like a fair comment to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 What's the deal with now having to sign up for you tube to view potentially offensive material btw? Cocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 Should team up with Big Ron tbh. What a double act! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44258 Posted November 21, 2006 Author Share Posted November 21, 2006 Jerry Seinfeld is definitely a cock. And unfunny to boot. Seinfeld remains utter garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 21, 2006 Share Posted November 21, 2006 Jerry Seinfeld is definitely a cock. And unfunny to boot. Seinfeld remains utter garbage. I quite like it. It's not 'laugh out loud' funny though imo and the praise for it is waaaaay over the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now