Jump to content

Park Life

Legend
  • Posts

    35323
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Park Life

  1. I agree, 5th is the new 1st. We won it twice recently Well done. I'll take you out for a lasagne and we can celebrate. As long as we can have some fizzy pop with it Ouch!
  2. We have our own set of circumstances and that defines us. We have a harder set of circumstances but we do fantastically well for a club with those circumstances. You're not the only special ones. Trust me you couldn't take our club out of Lancashire, it has a completely different atmosphere to Newcastle granted so maybe you have trouble seeing it. Sunderland are down the road, get massive crowds..not as big as yours but bigger than most, but you don't see the same hot air coming from their fans. If you were more successful than us then granted, you may be able to accuse me of an inferiority complex. But feeling an inferiority complex against a side regularly referred to as a "joke club" and a "laughing stock"? Can't say I feel that. You've nearly grapsed what i was saying, the comment about 'taking your club out of Lancashire' shows me you have some difficulty with higher abstract concepts. An eminent educational specialist this week just highlighted the research link between higher abstract thinking and over-use of the internet, which explains your "cliche bingo"-type thinking at the end of that post. Inferior to those clubs around you btw, like Spurs fans being inferior to arsenal needing to come on here. He's a woman??!!
  3. I've rarely seen an arse rape as vivid as in this thread.
  4. Fair points. The old debate is whether Fergy would have managed to reign in Gazza's excesses? I think he would, although TV was also a good man manager and motivator at the time.
  5. The 1750 didn't get anywhere near general sale you cunt, the board dictates what allocation we take you utter mug. I still remember the 400 you brought here in the FA Cup in December 99 4 fucking hundred - Orient brung more in the league cup. All the teams I mentioned piss on your support, I put your support in the non-entity bracket with your Southampton and Coventry's. REKNOWNED for having the most passionate fans in London ahahahahahahah by fucking who? No one who has a clue that is for certain. My whole life, and baring in mind I class London as my second city, I have never heard that assertion off anyone, because no one is stupid enough to say it. 1.West Ham 2.Millwall 3.Chelsea 4.Brentford
  6. Can imagine Fop befuddling many a lonely teenager.
  7. Ministers have been warned that a growing group of Labour rebels will demand that the Nepalese veterans, who fought for Britain in conflicts including the Falklands, be allowed to retire here. The High Court last year declared that preventing Gurkhas who had served in the British Army before 1997 from living in this country was unlawful. Government has betrayed us, say Gurkhas New rules on Gurkhas' right to live in Britain condemned by Joanna Lumley In response, the Home Office last week issued fresh criteria for allowing Gurkhas into the UK, but set the bar for entry so high that campaigners say that only a few hundred veterans will ever qualify. The new rules dictate that only Gurkhas with at least 10 years' service are eligible to come to Britain. Soldiers from Commonwealth countries serving with the British Armed Forces can apply after only four years. Campaigners described the Government's move as a "betrayal". Gurkhas have fought for Britain for 200 years and 45,000 died in the two World Wars. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, has called for all former Gurkhas to be admitted to Britain and will later on Wednesday trigger a Commons vote on the issue. He told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme: "It's a very simple principle. If you're prepared to die for a country, you should be allowed to settle in it." He accused the Government of acting "despicably" by seeking to "scare people" by saying that giving access to all former Gurkhas and their families would mean 100,000 people coming to Britain. Disgrace basically.
  8. One lump or two? Not sure if that's even true but I seem to remember hearing it once. There isn't enough to eat in it to sustain any large predators though. Apparently.
  9. Low slung sofas and ergonomic kitchens have a lot to answer for. What happened to that butter mountain and wine lake? The public deserve an ans.
  10. Have you a decent sized cock, soccermom? FYP.
  11. Have you a decent sized cock? [soccermom/]
  12. Probably about 3 billion, to live in something approaching harmony with the planet, and living to a decent standard of Western living, not just turning the whole of the planet into Lincolnshire combined with London. Well the planet will survive, about anything else though. The code.
  13. I'm surprised there wasn't a stiff reprimand. Sympathy nosh? Pizza surprise.
  14. To be fair, if we'd have got Modric and a couple of other decent players we wouldn't be having this conversation and Mikey baby would have a much more valuable asset on his hands. Who could possibly have seen this coming...? Word.
  15. Looks like JJ has made a very good re-invention of the franchise. Clips look awesome.
  16. The Star Wars box office numbers will be under threat for the first time in a long while.
  17. Western style living is killing the planet.
  18. I'd suggest it was the over way round, but it's chicken and egg stuff. But if you really regard reducing child mortality as an unfortunate side effect of aid programs (this is what you said, right?), why don't you simply advocate the benefits of genocide instead? Except it's not, if you give a decent stand or living to the poor they don't instantly stop breeding (again look at immigrant birth rates in the UK, even 2nd and 3rd generation). Yet you can reduce poverty quite quickly by reducing birth rate (look at the places in Africa where it is being done, or even China for that matter). Beside Rob W probably made a living hunting street children in Brazil. ...to eclectic ambient techno I shouldn't wonder.
  19. Well that and that they were with several of the 7/7 bombers (and were all close friends with several other 7/7 bombers and largely shared their ideology that the West must be destroyed and crushed under the heel of Islam) - apart from that. So it's not "ok" to blow up your own countrymen in your own country, but it is "ok" to go somewhere else and kill them? That is the most clueless post on 7/7 parading the internet. In all honesty if you were looking for people that helped the 7/7 bombers where would you start looking? Maybe with people that were close friends of said bombers, people that had the same Islamofascist ideology as the 7/7 (to the point where they admit they wanted to kill British citizens - just certain ones.... which was actually quite clever legally, as they couldn't deny it, only try to convince the jury that they wouldn't hurt civilians), people that had been to London with and visited the sites of the explosions with 2 of the bombers? Really it would have been derelict of the police to not investigate these people (especially as two of them have been convicted on lesser charges). Was it right to go to trial? I think so, even thought the chances of a conviction were low due to the nature of the charges they were trying to prove. Mi6 and the breakdown of the covenant.
  20. Everyone on the planet can stand on the Isle of Wight, but that doesn't mean the Isle of Wight (or the whole of the UK or the whole of the EU) can feed and provide a high standard of living to those people (never mind the environment and every other living thing). And we're going to get 3 Billion more people in the next 25-50 years, so even the Isle of Wight isn't big enough any more. When Rob W starts worrying about these things I'll take notice. Rob W will be dead by then, so it's not his problem.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.