Park Life

I am still the king of various Little Chef's, dotted as they are like little Buddhist shrines, sanctuaries of little England before the darkies came.

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million). Statistics are lying whores. Interestingly Chris, did you see that Bill Gates now agree with Fop on population reduction? The all break in the end. He's been at it a lot longer than you....What do you think his foundation in Africa is all about?? Selling windows in Africa. Think inoculations, think airborne aids, think butterfly strategy, think gold, thin viaduct, think permeate, think eugenics, think...... Anyway here is some cud, Gates Foundation: Ethically Challenged The do-gooder reputation of the Gates Foundation has just taken a major hit. In a major investigative piece, the Los Angeles Times is reporting that the foundation "has holdings in many companies that have failed tests of social responsibility because of environmental lapses, employment discrimination, disregard for worker rights, or unethical practices." Here’s another excerpt: The Gates Foundation has poured $218 million into polio andmeasles immunization and research worldwide, including in the NigerDelta. At the same time that the foundation is funding inoculations toprotect health, The Times found, it has invested $423 million in Eni, Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and Total of France— the companies responsible for most of the flares blanketing the deltawith pollution, beyond anything permitted in the United States orEurope. This quote from a foundation representative suggests a see-no-evilapproach: "Because we want to maintain a focus on the programmaticwork, we have made it a policy to not comment on individual investmentholdings." Indeed, the foundation reportedly has a "firewall" between investing and services. Let me play devil’s advocate here. Let’s say the Gates Foundationonly invested in "good" companies. Would it make as much money? Isethical investing as profitable over the long run as investing in justabout anything? What financial price, if any, might the foundation pay to do the rightthing? Aye that is one of iffy things, the other is (much like Assley) it's very easy to be flash when your worth XXX amount, because you can throw away obscene amounts of money and still have the income to make up for it, if you're suddenly brought down to XX or X amount, although you might still have more than 98% of the world can ever even dream about, you're suddenly a lot less flamboyant. I rarely study people, of more interest is the friends they keep isn't it??

An offer and no mistake.

"Pipes up"?? ? Just highlighting the general braggadocio of such a remark, knowing as I do you would let loose the fists of fury if within earshot of such and outlandish liberty.

There are no......

Basically they've realised: 1. Being at war with your own fans is not a good idea. & 2. The recording industry rips them off as much as it does the consumer. The recording industry will still win though, they have too much money not to do so. Why don't artists just sell their own music from their own website?? No reason not to now days. Unless you're a lazy primadonna who can't be arsed to learn HTML. I had to take all of our stuff down because of possible litigation over our band name, but even my little old band had tracks for sale on iTunes, Rhapsody, and the other usual suspects. There is absolutely no reason to go through these antiquated record companies any longer unless you can't get the money together for a proper recording, are lazy, would just rather someone else do all the work for you because you're such an artist. You're on their hit list now. Lols, they already hit me, bud. I work in a fucking factory and haven't played in public in 4 years. There is a RIAA over that as we speak. You think they're bad? I should tell you about the horseshit cease and desist lawsuit that's sort of been brought against me over our old band name. It's truly an amazing example of why copyrights in this country are ludicrous. You'd think there would be more killin in a country packed with guns and cunts.

How did he do it??

"Pipes up"??

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million). Statistics are lying whores. Interestingly Chris, did you see that Bill Gates now agree with Fop on population reduction? The all break in the end. He's been at it a lot longer than you....What do you think his foundation in Africa is all about?? Selling windows in Africa. Think inoculations, think airborne aids, think butterfly strategy, think gold, thin viaduct, think permeate, think eugenics, think...... Anyway here is some cud, Gates Foundation: Ethically Challenged The do-gooder reputation of the Gates Foundation has just taken a major hit. In a major investigative piece, the Los Angeles Times is reporting that the foundation "has holdings in many companies that have failed tests of social responsibility because of environmental lapses, employment discrimination, disregard for worker rights, or unethical practices." Here’s another excerpt: The Gates Foundation has poured $218 million into polio andmeasles immunization and research worldwide, including in the NigerDelta. At the same time that the foundation is funding inoculations toprotect health, The Times found, it has invested $423 million in Eni, Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and Total of France— the companies responsible for most of the flares blanketing the deltawith pollution, beyond anything permitted in the United States orEurope. This quote from a foundation representative suggests a see-no-evilapproach: "Because we want to maintain a focus on the programmaticwork, we have made it a policy to not comment on individual investmentholdings." Indeed, the foundation reportedly has a "firewall" between investing and services. Let me play devil’s advocate here. Let’s say the Gates Foundationonly invested in "good" companies. Would it make as much money? Isethical investing as profitable over the long run as investing in justabout anything? What financial price, if any, might the foundation pay to do the rightthing?

Some Americans with Canadian partners go across the border for free healthcare do they not??

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million). Statistics are lying whores. Interestingly Chris, did you see that Bill Gates now agree with Fop on population reduction? The all break in the end. He's been at it a lot longer than you....What do you think his foundation in Africa is all about??

Fuck me this not starting threads lark is killing me already...

Not late at night on Ch4 no.

Stalked by a giant teddy called Mohammed?

With Vista I've found I have to clean it and run reg checks at least every week. Especially with the laptop near the bed.

I'm sure a couple of whiskeys will be in order and by that I don't mean Bells.

I won't start any threads till we lose.

Can you get it on ringtone?

"Donnie Darkie". A new film by Rajesh Pankawallah. "British realism at its best." The Times "A tour de force" The nawab of Pataudi. Donnie starts to understand how wearing a pringle and following Leeds in the early 80's isn't satiating his claustrophobic life working in his dads paper shop. "My Beautiful Launderette for the new generation brought up on fish and chips with curry sauce and dabblings in Jihadi porn." Sachin Tendulkar".

What a fucking idiot That is hilarious, and this cunts been made a mod. You should put that in your rules on the rule guidance page. "if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too." Basically stating if that someone wants to use racist terminology when trying to be ironic, then this forum condones it. Thanks for clearing that up. come off it Stevie, you know fine well you're being argumentative for the sake of it. If you can't see the difference between "Darkie" and "Nigger", well, you should just give up your speaking out loud privileges as you're obviously guilty of wasting them. I can't even get my head around the breathtaking ignorance in your post. I know you're from Blyth but fuck me. Just incredible. The silence from the other moderators is notable. This is one of the biggest :oh no: moments I've seen on toontastic. Measuring two racist terms against each other, and the one you perceive as milder is passed as acceptable. As for nigger being a stronger word that darkie, I completely and utterly disagree. Nigger is a word used more by Americans the British people, and is used by black people as an every day word about other black people, but the rule is white people are not allowed to say it. Darkie is a more British derogatory term for black people, and in my view and in the view of others I've discussed it with equally as bad as "nigger", maybe even more so purely in my opinion due to the way the word "nigger" has almost been commercialised. Your ignorance is beyond staggering. When you started on this stance I almost spat my corn flakes out. Lets hope the newspaper don't see this, unless it's the Daily Mail you're going to join. Oh dear. In America "Nigga" is the commercialised term whereas "Nigger" is derogatory. Nevertheless, I agree that "darkie" is also a racist term and should be in the same category. Fish is digging a hole here. Yes, comparable to the one in Calcutta. It's only taken him three days. "Donnie Darkie" has a nice ring to it mind. The story of a alienated Asian lad growing up in Bradford. I'll whack off the synopsis tonight. I often refer to it as 'Donnie Darkie'. Racist? Moi? Pass the crudites love.

What a fucking idiot That is hilarious, and this cunts been made a mod. You should put that in your rules on the rule guidance page. "if someone were to repeat something like that later on, that'd be fine too." Basically stating if that someone wants to use racist terminology when trying to be ironic, then this forum condones it. Thanks for clearing that up. come off it Stevie, you know fine well you're being argumentative for the sake of it. If you can't see the difference between "Darkie" and "Nigger", well, you should just give up your speaking out loud privileges as you're obviously guilty of wasting them. I can't even get my head around the breathtaking ignorance in your post. I know you're from Blyth but fuck me. Just incredible. The silence from the other moderators is notable. This is one of the biggest :oh no: moments I've seen on toontastic. Measuring two racist terms against each other, and the one you perceive as milder is passed as acceptable. As for nigger being a stronger word that darkie, I completely and utterly disagree. Nigger is a word used more by Americans the British people, and is used by black people as an every day word about other black people, but the rule is white people are not allowed to say it. Darkie is a more British derogatory term for black people, and in my view and in the view of others I've discussed it with equally as bad as "nigger", maybe even more so purely in my opinion due to the way the word "nigger" has almost been commercialised. Your ignorance is beyond staggering. When you started on this stance I almost spat my corn flakes out. Lets hope the newspaper don't see this, unless it's the Daily Mail you're going to join. Oh dear. In America "Nigga" is the commercialised term whereas "Nigger" is derogatory. Nevertheless, I agree that "darkie" is also a racist term and should be in the same category. Fish is digging a hole here. Yes, comparable to the one in Calcutta. It's only taken him three days. "Donnie Darkie" has a nice ring to it mind. The story of a alienated Asian lad growing up in Bradford. I'll whack off the synopsis tonight.

I thought it was decent. Not as good as their first though (albeit better named). They went to shit after that though I thought. Still have most of the singles.