Park Life

The scene at the water well when he comes out of the desert?

I'd go with the Alien and Bladerunner ones. Also Butch and Sundance...."Did you see Le Fleurs out there"....End shootout scene...

"I'm 23 you know".

The greatest film scenes ever shot We all have film sequences that stick in our minds. Some are shared by many – such as the shower scene from Psycho – others are particular to us. Here our film critic and a panel of leading movie-makers reveal their favourites. What are yours? Janet Leigh in Psycho. Photograph: Allstar Who will ever forget the first time they saw the 45-second shower-room murder in Hitchcock's Psycho? I remember 1959 and 1961 as the years when my first two children were born. But the first thing that comes to mind about the year in between was seeing Psycho, which I'd been looking forward to since a radio programme I'd produced the previous October, when Hitchcock had enticingly described Psycho as "my first real horror film". Entering the Plaza, Lower Regent Street, the day the film opened, I passed the cardboard cut-out of Hitchcock in the foyer, from which a tape recording of the Master's familiar Leytonstone undertaker's voice warned us what would happen if we gave away the ending. Half an hour into the movie, when Janet Leigh stared out at us from the floor, a man sitting in front of me staggered into the aisle and vomited: testimony to the sensitive stomachs of the time, or (as several other people I know witnessed a similar incident at the Plaza that week) evidence that Paramount's publicity department had hired a method actor for the film's opening run? Err Psycho, Casablanca, North by Nothwest...the usual ones... The Taxi Driver mirror scene is pretty much up there for me and why no Alien?? http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/mar/14...e-scenes-psycho

Times and Sunday Times websites to start charging from June Users to be charged £1 for a day's access and £2 for a week's subscription for access to both papers' websites Times Online Times Online: will relaunch in May and charge from June The Times and the Sunday Times are to start charging for content online in June. Users will be charged £1 for a day's access and £2 for a week's subscription for access to both papers' websites, publisher News International has announced. The News International chief executive, Rebekah Brooks, implied in a statement that its other titles, the Sun and the News of the World, would follow. The papers will relaunch their websites in early May and will be available for a free trial period to registered users. Readers can register from today at timesplus.co.uk.

http://www.chemtrailsuk.net/

Well that is a little bit of good news. Apparently Obama was watching telly and chatting to staffers while Netty ate with the kids. Cut the fucking aid buget.

Eh? Barium spraying in the upper atmosphere for whatever reason is a fact Robbie dear. I dont know enough about chemistry to answer this myself but is there any danger putting barium and aluminium into the environs? ie. water table and atmosphere? anybody got an answer to that one? They're clearly more worried about UV and Co2 right now.

The Israeli's? Nah mate they'll go to New Yoik.

Eh? Barium spraying in the upper atmosphere for whatever reason is a fact Robbie dear.

Had a hand in a lot of dodgy things though. Yeah.

He's armless.

why? I'm right in saying the current freedom of speech laws are anything but free. get over it of course they are not, everybody is or should be bound by a degree of respect for others and their beliefs and the laws and way of the country they live in. Unfortunately, muslims seem to think they can change all of this, and misguided fools like Tooner keep telling us how great it is in Canada and think these racists DO have total freedom of speech, using the "racist" card if you object to it. Agree with the first bit but I think you're letting your prejudices get in the way there since Tooner was the one saying there should be restrictions on freedom of speech whereas AA here was saying even the likes of Abu Hamza should be able to say what they want regardless of the consequences. You could have avoided that mistake by reading what they actually wrote. I am reading, but not really responding to tooner because I don't care what goes on in Canada. I saw his comment where he insinuates that I "am deciding what can and can't be said", the point is, I am not. I am saying the same thing as AA ie the law stinks, and as it stands is leaning the way of PC correct loonies who have spent x amount of years trying to tell the likes of me and you what we can and can't say about foreigners and their actions, in our own country. Why should Hamza be able to say what he likes ? He is banged up, and should stay banged up, where he can say what he likes to fellow inmates if he likes and gets a good deserved kicking for his trouble. Thought the muslims had taken over the prisons.

You tried that mephadrone yet Parky? Its a bit shit, good for keeping you going when you've run out of anything decent. Never tried it.

...missed a bit off...After a while the new monkey was beaten regardless of going for the banana or not...

Siencentist once tested monkeys .. They put 5 monkeys in a closed room where a banana was hanging on the ceiling. Naturally they ran for it and one of them got it. Result was that loud noise and cold rainwater was showered into the room. This was repeated until they give up their passion for the banana. Next phase was to replace one of the monkeys with a "fresh" newcomer and see what happens... Newbie naturally tried to reach the banana but the other monkeys beat him so long that he gave up the idea! They replaced little by little all all the monkeys untill all were changed. But still always the new monkey was beated by the others when he went for the banana.

It's a rogue state basically and doesn't give a rats arse about normal conventions that protect status and rights of the people it systematically opresses. But their day is approaching....

Only ham on the menu apparently.

Ne5?

In diplomatic circles it's quite the rebuke apparently.

Tucked.

Reading around a bit, it looks like the exchanges between Netanyahu and Obama were less than pleasant, perhaps Obama has laid down the old...so far and no further doctrine (we can but hope).

The numbers have dropped massively over the past year though. Seems people are getting far more informed on the middle east after waging war for almost a decade in the area. I include myself in that by the way. 5 years ago I wouldn't have had a clue as to what was going on over there....but I 'd have said Israel were looking out for us, when all they do is fan the flames. I remember when you used to have a pop at me for highlighting this topic ad naseum.

not really, it's exactly the sort of thing the current hate speech legislation is in place to ward against. it was words over the radio that sparked the massacres, granted the underlying racial tension had existed for long before that it was words that got the ball rolling. Sorry but how is that in context to Europe?