Park Life

Im a relapsed smoker. the simple answer is no. same, I stopped for 5years and for a time you do stop craving them, they just don't pop into the mind like the do when you smoke, however a sight, a smell, anything can remind you of something from your past when you smoked and the craving will it you like a freight train 5 years man and I've started again in the last 3 weeks, what a wanker!! My mates who gave up just got fat and boring.

Life is short enough why torture yourself? the wife, simple as. if i was a single man, i would smoke no doubt. she adopted a clever approach; if i smoke, sex is off the cards. That's a tricky one. How about smoke days and nookie days?

Renton still smokes.

Giving up the coke was harder tbh.

Go on.....

Life is short enough why torture yourself?

E.U. Signals Big Shift on Genetically Modified Crops By JAMES KANTER Published: May 9, 2010 BRUSSELS — Madeira is more than 500 kilometers from the African coast and is officially one of the “outermost regions” of the European Union. Green A blog about energy and the environment. Go to Blog Despite that far-flung status, Madeira catapulted into the center of the Union’s agricultural and environmental affairs last year when Portugal asked the European Commission for permission to impose an unprecedented ban on growing biotech crops there. Last week, the commission quietly let the deadline pass for opposing Portugal’s request, allowing Madeira, which is one of Portugal’s autonomous regions, to become the first E.U. territory to get formal permission from Brussels to remain entirely free of genetically modified organisms. Madeira now will probably go ahead and implement the ban, a spokeswoman for the Portuguese government said Friday. Individual European countries and regions have banned certain genetically modified crops before. Many consumers and farmers in countries like Austria, France and Italy regard the crops as potentially dangerous and likely to contaminate organically produced food. But the case of Madeira represents a significant landmark, because it is the first time the commission, which runs the day-to-day affairs of the European Union, has permitted a country to impose such a sweeping and definitive rejection of the technology. The Madeirans’ main concerns focused on preserving the archipelago’s biodiversity and its forest of subtropical laurel trees. Such forests, known as laurisilva, were once widespread on the European mainland but were wiped out thousands of years ago during an earlier period of climate change. That has left Madeira with “much the largest extent of laurel forest surviving in the world, with a unique suite of plants and animals,” according to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, which named the Madeiran laurisilva a World Heritage Site in 1999. The forest also is a growing attraction for tourists, who make up a significant portion of Madeira’s earnings. In seeking to ban biotechnology on Madeira, the Portuguese government told the commission that it would be impossible to separate crops containing genetically engineered material from other plant life. The “risk to nature presented by the deliberate release of GMOs is so dangerous and poses such a threat to the environmental and ecological health of Madeira, that it is not worthwhile risking their use, either directly in the agricultural sector or even on an experimental basis,” the Portuguese told the commission, using the acronym for genetically modified organisms. In an internal memorandum seen by the International Herald Tribune, the commission said it had let the deadline in the Madeira case pass without a formal assessment and more fanfare because that could “create misunderstandings and send confusing signals” at a time when Europe was reconsidering its approach to cultivating GMOs. In reality, the Madeira case marks the unofficial beginning of a new — and potentially highly contentious — policy that would give European nations and regions far greater freedom to decide when to ban such crops. In return for that freedom, skeptical countries like Austria would be expected to drop their opposition at E.U. meetings to approving more biotech crops for cultivation, allowing countries and regions that do wanted to plant them to do so. The policy would be aimed at overcoming an institutionalized stalemate in Europe that has left governments unable to reach decisions on whether to allow cultivation of new biotech products. As a result of that stalemate, only two biotech crops are allowed in Europe: a corn called Mon 810 from Monsanto and a potato called Amflora from the German industrial group BASF. " http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/business...nt/10green.html

ISAAA figures show reduced GM crops in 7 countries Tuesday, 23 February 2010 15:17 Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail GM Crop Expansion Limited in 2009 – ISAAA figures show reduced areas in seven countries Immediate release, 23 February 2010 The latest data from the ISAAA on GM crops around the world [1] reveals that seven out of 25 countries had reduced GM cultivation areas in 2009 and another remained static. The data from the industry-funded group reveals that no new countries grew GM crops during this period. The combined area of all GM crops in 2009 covered just 2.7% of all agricultural land. [2] Very little of this production went directly to feed people, as most went into animal feed (GM maize, soy and canola), industrial scale biofuels (GM maize, soy and canola) or to produce cotton. The expansion of GM maize in Brazil alone accounted for over 60% of the 9 million hectares increase in GM cultivation area in 2009. In seven other countries the area under GM crops actually fell in 2009 (compared with 2008), including two of what ISAAA describe as "mega" countries: *China's GM cultivation area was down 3%; *Paraguay’s GM cultivation area was down 19%. The only other country with significant growth in area was India, where Bt cotton cultivation expanded. However the biotech industry received a major setback recently when the Indian government placed a moratorium on the approval of GM Bt brinjal (aubergine) for commercial production pending further scientific assessment on safety and cross pollination. The decision followed months of mass protests throughout the country. [3] Globally the same six countries continue to dominate GM cropping: US, Brazil, Argentina, India, Canada and China grew nearly 95% of all GM crops, while the remaining production area in 20 other countries remains low. One crop, GM herbicide tolerant soybeans (mostly Monsanto’s Roundup Ready), accounted for 52% of all GM crops. In all, GM soybeans, maize, cotton and canola accounted for over 99% of all plantings, demonstrating that no new GM crops have been adopted on any scale since GM crops were first grown commercially. The US grew the highest number of different types of GM. However, deregulation of GM herbicide tolerant alfalfa and GM sugar beet have both been suspended by US courts because of the failure of the US Environmental Protection Agency [4] to conduct an environmental impact assessment on the crops. The ISAAA report fails to assess weed resistance to glyphosate, which has become a major problem in GM herbicide tolerant crops in North and South America. [5] More weed killers are being used to combat this problem, and in the US the total of amount of herbicide used each year has increased since GMHT crops were introduced in 1996. [6] In Europe, the majority of GM maize (the only crop approved for cultivation) was again grown in Spain, but there was a 4% fall in the area grown in 2009. Figures given by ISAAA for the EU reveal that the area fell in five out of seven of the principal maize growing regions in Spain in 2009 [7] – a decline that began in some regions in 2004. Elsewhere in Europe the area of GM maize fell for the second year in a row: *Germany's GM cultivation (where a ban was introduced in 2009) was down 100%; *The Czech Republic's GM cultivation was down 31%; *Romania's GM cultivation was down 57%; *Slovakia's GM cultivation was down 54%. The area in Poland under GM remained static in 2009. Five other EU countries have banned the cultivation of Monsanto's GM maize. [8]

128th in the world as ranked by GDP, 11th biggest economy in the world despite mega population, population spiralling out of control, massive inequalities in wealth distribution, no national health service to speak of, life expectancy 20 years behind European average, massive illiteracy problems, and can apparently afford to send men to the moon (something the US never managed ). Etfuckingcetera. Aye..... Backward. That's very Eurocentric of you. What they have achieved from where they started is nothing less than astounding and would beat all of europe together in a standup fight if no nukes were used. The population issue as with China is a huge challenge and makes for easy point scoring for idiots. I was wrong anyway. the love the GM.

Yup.

Bit of kebeb fell into the petri dish apparently.

Monsanto whould be closed down......they are evil incarnate Maybe but I'm all for GM personally. Can't stop progress. really? do you think they should be allowed to fiddle with the reproductive portions of seeds? right now they sell sterile seeds so that farmer have to buy more the next year....bullshit in my opinion. GM for the betterment of mankind i can get behind, GM for the sole purpose of making money and at the risk of future generations of plants is irresponsible and exactly whats wrong with society as a whole. Indian Govt have banned it recently iirc Banned what? All GM technology or Monsanto? India is quite a backward country anyway tbf. Yeah, almost no debt, growing at 7% a year with nukes, a world renowned hi tech sector and plans for a moonmission. As you say...Backward.

The inquests of the 7 July suicide bombers will not be heard at the same time as their 52 victims, coroner Lady Justice Hallett said today. Hallett told the Royal Courts of Justice in central London that the hearings would consider the role of MI5 and police prior to the 2005 terrorist attacks. The judge had been asked to decide what form the inquests would take. "The scope of the inquest into the 52 deaths will include the alleged intelligence failings and the immediate aftermath of the bombings," Hallett said. "To my mind it is not too remote to investigate what was known in the year or two before the alleged bombings. Plots of this kind are not developed overnight." Last month counsel for the Security Service and the home secretary said disclosing MI5 files about the four suicide bombers to the families of those killed in the London attacks would be "impossible". MI5 argued that investigating claims that it could have prevented the atrocities would involve "handing over the keys" to MI5's Thames House headquarters. The judge said she would sit without a jury, and intends to grant "interested persons" status to relatives of those killed and the emergency services, but not to survivors. "I am sure however that the survivors, despite not being granted interested persons status, will play an important part in the process," Hallett said. "I will do all I can to make sure their interests are properly taken into account." Relatives of the deceased had expressed dismay last year upon discovering the inquests of the bombers and their victims were to be held together." I too would love to see what Mi5 already had on the bombers. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/may/21/7...ictims-inquests

Monsanto whould be closed down......they are evil incarnate Maybe but I'm all for GM personally. Can't stop progress. really? do you think they should be allowed to fiddle with the reproductive portions of seeds? right now they sell sterile seeds so that farmer have to buy more the next year....bullshit in my opinion. GM for the betterment of mankind i can get behind, GM for the sole purpose of making money and at the risk of future generations of plants is irresponsible and exactly whats wrong with society as a whole. Indian Govt have banned it recently iirc

HOw is Milner worth £25m?

I'd put Hill Street Blues up there with the wire for multi-handed writing.

Are we all going to chip in for Renton's birthday... Very well written as it goes.

FFS Rents!! Will-you-stop-biting??!!!

He's written for Brass Eye. He co-wrote Nathan Barley and he did Dead Set on his own. Yes but Parkie is king of the internet so nyehhh Never heard of any of em.

Wow! That's a bit harsh. Maybe if old Charlie tried to make it as a screenwriter than a two bit regurgitator of tv clips (the cheapest form of television) while acting the smarmy git who's mindset is that he is still at Uni (beer, couch, raised eyebrow - paunched cynicim) I'd take his tv writing criticery more seriously. YOu see Charlie it's easy this game.

The hybrid corn seeds Monsanto has donated to Haiti are treated with the fungicide Maxim XO, and the calypso tomato seeds are treated with thiram.(3) Thiram belongs to a highly toxic class of chemicals called ethylene bisdithiocarbamates (EBDCs). Results of tests of EBDCs on mice and rats caused concern to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which then ordered a special review. The EPA determined that EBDC-treated plants are so dangerous to agricultural workers that they must wear special protective clothing when handling them. Pesticides containing thiram must contain a special warning label, the EPA ruled. The EPA also barred marketing of the chemicals for many home garden products, because it assumes that most gardeners do not have adequately protective clothing.(4) Monsanto's passing mention of thiram to Ministry of Agriculture officials in an email contained no explanation of the dangers, nor any offer of special clothing or training for those who will be farming with the toxic seeds." You couldn't make it up.

Popeye Doyle Harry Callahan Axel Foley Gil Grissom Dexter Morgan Fuck me how did I forget him?!

He's very good at following the white lines in the hospital apparently.

One development or trend you'd like to see reversed?