Park Life

I can measure the movement of the moon and its relative distance (because it comes closer and moves away) with a telescope, a watch and some graph paper.

If I went to the lab at Paolo Alto and measured the age and distance of stars (100 of scientists and students have) then I would say that it is impossible that somehow these 'stars' was light coming from our planet.

Magnetic field and proximity....ie earth and moon.

If they are from inside the earth then how do you account for red shift?

It's not what I beleive it's a simple experiment I can do myself with a bit of metal and two magnets. Ffs!

If we are inside a cell then the light from stars would refract. Why don't they?

Ocean is not a dense mass. It is one of the more loose configuration of particles. The moon 'pulls up' the ocean ever so slightly (it can be observed near the edge of land mass - a meter or so)but earths gravity dominates because earths gravity is stronger AND CLOSER. Gravitational fields and their attraction is dependent on proximity.

Water isn't water Wolfie it's Hydrogen and oxygen particles that interact with each other and their surroundings. Gravity is a weak force but the earths gravity is enough to hold the particles in place even though they are also 'attracted' to the moon (tides).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet

The problem people have is that your reasoning is so vague. You can believe whatever you want but it doesn't get interesting unless you come up with something concrete.

Is Mars a cell as well?

I know this discussion has been going on Godlike and ATS. They are both filled with shills and people hell bent of distracting proper discussions with quasi-mystical and cod Gaia whimsy. I don't mean you. If there was a pressure difference outside the 'cell' would expand continually like a balloon does when you blow it up. As the pressure outside the balloon is lower than inside it. So although I do personally believe in a connected universe (light/electromagnetism/attraction) I don't think we need a quasi-biological explanation to cover what is already connected by various types of trace energy. However thinking differently is never a bad thing. I positively encourage it.

Is this cell or yours surrounded by a vacuum? Or is it connected to another 'cell'. Are these cells in space?

I can go with discussions about Gravity with reg to electromagnetic force and mass and how information is exchanged between forces no problem. But living inside a cell? I know where this is coming from and I know it is pure distraction. We're all made of stardust Wolfie we can't be inside anything. Northrop Grumman have been doing research by applying a charge to surfaces with reg to stealth and as a by product they found that the craft is a tiny bit 'lighter'. The charge was interfering with how gravity works.

What would be the point about lying about the nature of the earth?

All the other planets are round. The ball is the most common shape in the universe. Flat earthers are all shills.

Yeah but the flat earth stuff is bollocks tho.

Put all the leaders in a Big Brother house together. The only way the public will take politics seriously.

Something of the night about her.

Probably best you were kept away from the negotiations. I know what you mean.

Yeah I was reading the old Wonga article while typing. I mean to say I wasn't hoping for 16m a year.

Some other places are saying 45m over 3 years. That would be fantastic bearing in mind the peanuts we got from Wonga. Still seems like a massive amount I was hoping for 6m a year or summink.

Reminded by Gloom I got a couple of bottles of Chateau Neuf the other day.

As the reviews start breaking it's getting panned with special ire for Ridley.