Park Life

Catholic school as well. Seriously thinking about taking it further. Get the details of the board of governors and write to them.

I hate this sort of thing. It's psychologically really damaging for a child. Throw the fucking book at them mate. Take it as far as you can.

"Centers on the Shannons, an ordinary family from 2149 when the planet is dying who are transported back 85 million years to prehistoric Earth where they join Terra Nova, a colony of humans with a second chance to build a civilization. " http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1641349/ Amblin which is Spielberg's comapany done it.

Still not sure how all you MEN are getting knackered...Worst I get is having to pick her up from school and watch a bit of childerens telly with her while wolfing through her sweets. The professional babycare person (MrsP) takes over when she gets home from work and I slink off to my study.

The way me and Chez are we'll end up drinking the liquid straight out of the bottle.

Any good? Considering it. Not smoked a cigarette for 3 days but had a small roll-up last night before bed and a joint the night before (with analogue baccy). I'm using it as a psychological prop more than anything and have noticed that the craving for nicotine doesnt completely go away after vaping. Been doing some digging and found that there are concerns over the ability of e-cigs to deliver nicotine properly so potentially its because its not a good delivery system. Burning analogue is the most effective delivery system there is of course, so other methods like chewing a gum arent ever going to 'feel' the same. They are too expensive basically if the nicotine delivery is inefficient. There is a massive thread on the forum about it http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/nic...t-nicotine.html I'm going to continue to use the e-cig until the batch of liquid it came with runs out and supplement with one NRT tablet in the evening. Will let you know how things go. The reactions and experiences on that forum are widely variable....Worried. I was going to unveil the 'new me' to Mrs P over the w/e...Holding a silly looking ciggie with a battery in it... Not so sure now... Health benefits are the key I guess.

Any good? Considering it.

We need to organise some mystery inj to keep them away. Shouldn't be too hard with Ba.

Would have just walked out.

I don't really give a fuck...If he's bringing some chaos to ManC I'm all for it.

Mancini I come for you mothafuka!

Fuck this manchester shit Carlos let's by a boat and helicopter in for training.

I think Manchester is a shithole myself, the city centre is quite modern but it's got fuck all character, nothing like Newcastle in my view, but you have some of the nicest places in Britain within 15 miles like Alderley Edge, just live there ffs. I'm not that keen on Manchester, but if I was getting paid 250k a week I'd settle down and shut the fuck up about it. They should ban this whole contract shite where a player is owned by some company, whatever the fuck Tevez and Mascherano did to start off this saga. Think he should double his wage demands tbh.

I think Manchester is a shithole myself, the city centre is quite modern but it's got fuck all character, nothing like Newcastle in my view, but you have some of the nicest places in Britain within 15 miles like Alderley Edge, just live there ffs. Rather live in Brazil tbh.

Loads ah moneeeeee!!!!!

This was my initial question and why I was surprised we'd been able to retain him. I'd assumed he was on appreciably more than our modern top earner (Tiote) so now I'm guessing the deal was ultimately do-able because he was on roughly the same amount, and hence it didn't involve a departure from the new remuneration levels we've put in place. At the very least I'm guessing it was because he wasn't insisting on improved terms (cf Barton and Enrique). It would be really instructive to know what the terms of the deal are actually as this is the first time during our French/loan recruitment drive that one of the pre-relegation (presumed) higher earners has been retained. Yeah mate, I was thinking about it last night...I hope this is some kind of watershed and lessons alebeit slowly are being learnt. Think he's solid if not a worldbeater and this kind of commitment is generally healthy and should permeate through the squad. A possible corner might have been turned.

All the teams bar QPR are in worse shape than they were last year and we're in slightly better shape.

I thought he was on 'big money'?

You are setting the premise for Mancini to take into consideration the fact that Tevez is unhappy. Its completely irrelevant. He fields what he at the time feel is the strongest squad. Luckily this year he could field a very strong starting 11 without tevez, instead of being held to ransom by some greedy cunt. Honestly, boils my piss even as a inpartial viewer when I read about the tevez-saga, imagine how it must be like for Mancini. He must hate his guts... I would. Mancini isn't the man for ManC. His ego is too big and he's too defensive. You have to be a real artist to handle these players making all this money and so on...Tevez is showing poor loyalty and commitment...Hey! Welcome to the world of the mulit-millionaire player.

That's a big old mainstay in the conspiracy community.

Mancini has fucked up with Tevez. Should have started the season with Tevez and Aguero. All this nonsense about Tevez not doing a proper pre-season... Tevez doesn't want to be there anymore that has been clear for over a year and really tried to get out this summer. At least when he was playing regularly it took his mind of his family and whatever he has been going on about lately. With a fully firing Tevez the league was on this year.

Lennon was clueless till he met her.

Tevez looked a picture sitting on the bench on Sat. Then he kept coming down and warming up. Never came on.

For his attacking shortcomings, he's still a good steady player who always puts in a shift down the left and causes the ocassional panic in the opp defence. Good news.