Jump to content

Park Life

Legend
  • Posts

    35323
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Park Life

  1. Of course that begs the question...Is the moon fake?
  2. No we dont, we have an owner who has clearly stated he will not finance anything more. Therefore we are in a worse position than anyone else in the league. If Stoke spend £5million in January then its £5million more than we're going to. I'd be willing to bet we'll be in another negative spend position. Sell lots of players and buy cheap if anything at all. We are in serious trouble as things stand.
  3. Just as the Spurs revival is showing it is really only about having the right people working for you. If KK was still here I have no doubt we'd be sitting comfortably in mid-table and if he had got his players - a stronger squad.
  4. Turn the power on and off and then kick it. Normally works.
  5. Of course they live here. Microsoft is undeniable proof of that. Is there anything you can't place at the door of MS?
  6. Dennis would find him some cracking players though Llambrusco - "I hear you've unearthed a future gem for us, Arse. But there's on slight problem, Dennis doesn't agree with your £3,000,000 evaluation, he says he's worth £1,500,000 at most, so we won't be going for him" Wenger - "...... but with the right development he'll be worth £10,000,000 at least" Llambrusco - "look I hear you, but just stick to coaching, and let Dennis do his job..... he's very well qualified, he's played every Football Manager game since 1998, you know." Wenger - ".... but you said you wanted an Arsenal style system here..... I AM the Arsenal system...." Llambrusco - "no man is bigger than the club, and the system, well apart from Dennis who is a colossus among men". Wenger - "let me get this right... you promised me complete control when I got here, and now you're saying that I have to run everything past Dennis first?" Llambrusco - "Well yes.... but you can select the team..... so long as you send a copy of it to Dennis at least 4 hours before kick off so he can correct any mistakes." He'll clearly be on his way here next. You can easily replace one of those names with another one.
  7. Could very well have been. Or they could have been placed there by astronauts on covert mission/s. For me personally I don't dispute that America has sent man on the moon. I question what rocket was used, what mission, which astonauts and which year (could have been earlier than 1969). I think China plans to send a manned-mission to the moon by 2020. That's 12 years of more doubt and questioning - Yes, no, maybe. Actually it is the new Nasa manned moon mission that has estimated 2020. This kind of thing just makes me laugh..Meant to be a piece of piss putting men on the moon apparently, after all we did it in the 60's?? If you look at how much cash they threw at it then though, compared to now...... well it's surprising we can get out of the atmosphere. Yes but the tech curve evens out the monetary needs. It's my belief that they still find it very hard to put men on the moon (if they ever did), but now the Chinese have taken an interest, they have no choice but to go back. However the Americans and Russians are aware of 'the things' on the moon and are wary of going back (they ditched the ideas of dumping radioactive waste in space quite early). The Chinese are all gung ho about it which means they don't really know what is going on. This is vintage Parky btw. He doesn't accept the Americans definitely went to the Moon but he hints at them and the Soviets having knowledge of aliens there anyway What was the stuff that was supposedly picked up by amateur radio enthusiasts that hints at there being some alien presence there btw. I've read a transcript once. The astronaut says I can see it looking at me or something like that. Has that ever been verified? The mechanical things we sent already picked up enough to get JFK killed. Interesting thing about the Luna and other early mechanical landings was the amount of misses (totally missed the moon) and crashes. We didn't have our sums right for a long time..... Did we underestimate the gravitational forces of the moon, as I put forward many posts ago??? Yes.
  8. I concur Parky my friend. Peace brother.
  9. Could very well have been. Or they could have been placed there by astronauts on covert mission/s. For me personally I don't dispute that America has sent man on the moon. I question what rocket was used, what mission, which astonauts and which year (could have been earlier than 1969). I think China plans to send a manned-mission to the moon by 2020. That's 12 years of more doubt and questioning - Yes, no, maybe. Actually it is the new Nasa manned moon mission that has estimated 2020. This kind of thing just makes me laugh..Meant to be a piece of piss putting men on the moon apparently, after all we did it in the 60's?? If you look at how much cash they threw at it then though, compared to now...... well it's surprising we can get out of the atmosphere. Yes but the tech curve evens out the monetary needs. It's my belief that they still find it very hard to put men on the moon (if they ever did), but now the Chinese have taken an interest, they have no choice but to go back. However the Americans and Russians are aware of 'the things' on the moon and are wary of going back (they ditched the ideas of dumping radioactive waste in space quite early). The Chinese are all gung ho about it which means they don't really know what is going on. This is vintage Parky btw. He doesn't accept the Americans definitely went to the Moon but he hints at them and the Soviets having knowledge of aliens there anyway What was the stuff that was supposedly picked up by amateur radio enthusiasts that hints at there being some alien presence there btw. I've read a transcript once. The astronaut says I can see it looking at me or something like that. Has that ever been verified? The mechanical things we sent already picked up enough to get JFK killed. Interesting thing about the Luna and other early mechanical landings was the amount of misses (totally missed the moon) and crashes. We didn't have our sums right for a long time.....
  10. Could very well have been. Or they could have been placed there by astronauts on covert mission/s. For me personally I don't dispute that America has sent man on the moon. I question what rocket was used, what mission, which astonauts and which year (could have been earlier than 1969). I think China plans to send a manned-mission to the moon by 2020. That's 12 years of more doubt and questioning - Yes, no, maybe. Actually it is the new Nasa manned moon mission that has estimated 2020. This kind of thing just makes me laugh..Meant to be a piece of piss putting men on the moon apparently, after all we did it in the 60's?? If you look at how much cash they threw at it then though, compared to now...... well it's surprising we can get out of the atmosphere. Yes but the tech curve evens out the monetary needs. It's my belief that they still find it very hard to put men on the moon (if they ever did), but now the Chinese have taken an interest, they have no choice but to go back. However the Americans and Russians are aware of 'the things' on the moon and are wary of going back (they ditched the ideas of dumping radioactive waste in space quite early). The Chinese are all gung ho about it which means they don't really know what is going on. Nah, to get manned missions to the moon requires a lot of grunt, and there's a lot more health and safety these days (lose a few Astronauts in the early days and it was part of the cost, now it's an unmitigated disaster), and new technology might be 15% better, but it's often 50% more expensive) so on balance I think they'd probably need to spend even more than then. Besides which they probably haven't decide if the distance to the moon is metric or imperial yet. I think there are men on the moon already and permanently, they just don't really belong to America/Nasa/Federal Govt.
  11. I think there are two kinds of moon mission, one which is the official Nasa budget and another which is black budget and run from within a kind of maze of intelligence community assets and private coporations. I think the civil Govt lost control of this long ago.
  12. Could very well have been. Or they could have been placed there by astronauts on covert mission/s. For me personally I don't dispute that America has sent man on the moon. I question what rocket was used, what mission, which astonauts and which year (could have been earlier than 1969). I think China plans to send a manned-mission to the moon by 2020. That's 12 years of more doubt and questioning - Yes, no, maybe. Actually it is the new Nasa manned moon mission that has estimated 2020. This kind of thing just makes me laugh..Meant to be a piece of piss putting men on the moon apparently, after all we did it in the 60's?? If you look at how much cash they threw at it then though, compared to now...... well it's surprising we can get out of the atmosphere. Yes but the tech curve evens out the monetary needs. It's my belief that they still find it very hard to put men on the moon (if they ever did), but now the Chinese have taken an interest, they have no choice but to go back. However the Americans and Russians are aware of 'the things' on the moon and are wary of going back (they ditched the ideas of dumping radioactive waste in space quite early). The Chinese are all gung ho about it which means they don't really know what is going on.
  13. You would think with the high powered telescopes, that would be easy to demonstrate. Although one of the many pieces of evidence against the moon landings is the lack of a blast crater under the lunar lander, many thousands of pounds of thrust used in the landing surely would have blown away the dusty surface of the moon, yet in any of the photographs taken by the astronaughts show a pristine flat surface. Correct-a-mundo - what's more, with very little atmosphere there would have been no gravity to disperse the dust-cloud that this thrust would have produced. They should have been walking around in conditions that resembled thick fog - instead, the visibility was perfect. add to this the flapping flag in the footage, a strange effect in the vacuum of space. Of course if E.T. wanted to watch us the moon would be the best place to set up camp.
  14. Could very well have been. Or they could have been placed there by astronauts on covert mission/s. For me personally I don't dispute that America has sent man on the moon. I question what rocket was used, what mission, which astonauts and which year (could have been earlier than 1969). I think China plans to send a manned-mission to the moon by 2020. That's 12 years of more doubt and questioning - Yes, no, maybe. Actually it is the new Nasa manned moon mission that has estimated 2020. This kind of thing just makes me laugh..Meant to be a piece of piss putting men on the moon apparently, after all we did it in the 60's??
  15. There is/was deffo something on the moon that worried them. They haven't made a noise about going back till just very recently. Probably going back tooled up.
  16. Strange to believe but there are actually some with those doubts. : People are blaming KK even more now imo. Yet everything that has come out of the club since he went has been lies fed to Kinnear for him to pass on. So you'd think it might be safe to assume the owner's been lying all along. And there's loads of stuff seems to have been forgotten about. The Michael Owen contract offer - what the fuck's happened to that? The 'It is a fact that...' bit of propaganda. Not to mention the numerous post-Keegan's exit club statements that contradicted what had been said previously (like in Ashley's interview in the club magazine). They seem treating us like idiots; although it's fucking appropriate in many cases. If I'm being honest the attitude of many supporters makes me fucking sick. Fantastic post Seconded.
  17. Seriously guys get a grip, he'll go straight to Barca.
  18. Spurs will be out of sight by Christmas, we really need to start picking up points everywhere.
  19. Serioulsy the universe being the size it is. there must be other intelligent life out there and here.
  20. Everton win would be best for us.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.