Park Life

Thrown from the Book depository tbh.

Probably cause he hadn't seen him play four or five games like we have.

Yup. Keeps the shirt unless we buy Puyol or Lucio.

I had a feeling he might have stayed under KK.

I remember him clearly saying he was going to watch Bassong and that he had agreed to take a look at him on trial. What I like about Bassong is he does the simple things simply and although he can barely kick a ball with either foot he hasn't stopped his defensive interceptions.

Simple when you think about it really.

For he is already looking better than Taylord.

Easy to say that at half time. I am win. Me and Chez said it last week. You are loss.

How long is Duff out for? He needs to stay OUT.

DON'T TAKE MARTINS OR OWEN OFF.

Strangely I do have this down as a win...Not sure how or why.

I'm also a little concerned about Collo's positoning and Butt's ability to give away pelanties.

High.

General performance goodish, either side could have nicked one with a bit of luck. Ricky- liabitliy. Jonas-Invisible. Gutherie and Martins playing well. LET'S NOT TAKE MARTINS OFF AND LOSE THE GAME.

So, which Clieinetele album is the one to get?

Corr it's hot around here...... “Directed-energy systems could be used for crowd-control purposes. It’s not so futuristic anymore.” - Lt. Don Kester, sheriff’s tactical-response commander and a chairman in the National Tactical Officers Association L.A. County sheriff’s Cmdr. Sid Heal bore-sights the “Silent Guardian.” Raytheon Missile Systems calls the weapon “truly non-lethal.” Police agencies look to Raytheon weapon ARIZONA DAILY STAR | Dec 9, 2007 ‘Burning’ beam of directed energy marketed mainly to the military By Jack Gillum A recent spate of violence in Los Angeles County jails has Cmdr. Sid Heal looking for a better way to quell disturbances, and a Tucson-made weapon may be just the tool he needs. Heal, of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, is looking to new “directed-energy” technology from Tucson-based Raytheon Missile Systems as a possible addition to his department’s arsenal against unruly inmates. The weapons, which deliver a beam of energy that feels akin to scalding hot water but leaves no injuries, have been developed for use by the Defense Department as a “force-protection” tool for use on battlefields overseas. Now, Raytheon says, civilian law enforcement — and “security organizations” — may benefit from the technology, which the company calls a “truly non-lethal system” for situations when lethal force “may not be appropriate or warranted.” While the final price is unclear, Heal said it cost his department $3 million for Raytheon to build a prototype. “We have the largest jail in the world, with 20,000 crooks, and they all brought their problems with them,” said Heal, who heads the department’s Technology Exploration Unit. Directed energy, specifically Raytheon’s Active Denial System, works by emitting a focused beam of energy that penetrates the skin to 1/64th of an inch, which produces an intolerable heat that causes targeted people to flee. That system, which Raytheon delivered to the U.S. Air Force in September, has been marketed primarily to military contractors, spokesman John B. Patterson said. But demands from the Los Angeles County sheriff and potential future requests from other agencies or prisons, could change that, especially if directed-energy weapons were to follow the path of Taser weapons.

Crush all opposition and tactically buy out all land competitors might set up upon and mothball it? The Microsoft of the groceries world. Survival of the fittest and all that.... Or do you suggest they should all say "no, after you..."? As much as many on board seems to favour massive companies doing dodgy or even outright illegal things for their own benefit, they have been reprimanded over their block buying policies. Or do you think "might is right/survival of the biggest" and that's the end of it? No i think you should passivley let your competitors fuck you over just like Woolies did. Oh hang on, that one didnt work out very well for their employees..... Yes we all know your philosophy; get to the top by any means necessary then do everything and anything you can to stay there. That's a good corporate plan, but it's why Governments need to put some limits corporate greed. I'm sure you'd justify slavery economically if it gave a big enough dividend, but that's not really the point..... No, i meant that Woolies did not act like Tesco, thats why people have lost their jobs. Tesco needs to act within the regulations but it also has to strive to be as competitive as it can or it too will go the same way. My philosophy? Dont be daft lad, i wouldnt bore people with my philosophical ramblings on here. If you're interested, i fall between Rawls and Sen and use this framework to express it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_welfare_function TESCO has acted outside of regulations (repeatedly), so clearly that's how you think Woolworth's should have gone. Personally I can't see how Woolworth's could have saved itself as is, short of Slavery. No, i think (stop saying what i think man, its really childish) that Tesco have done some bad things but also represent firstly the preferences of the UK population who are too lazy to shop at independent small retailers and secondly a company competitive enough to penetrate international markets (helping the currency and balance of payments). When you compete in a fierce market like food retail then being aggressive is a way of life. Obviously there are drawbacks, i quite agree but i'd rather have a slightly over-aggressive Tesco than a dead Woolies. Dont you agree on balance that sounds about fair? Again you're still saying that Woolies should have acted like Tescos and broke rules (I don't understand why you think you aren't saying that when you are)...... but I still don't think that would have saved them as is. Well not unless they had become massively dominant first, in which case Tescos would have been destroyed years ago. You can act like Michael Jackson by putting on a glittery glove and doing the moon walk. You don't have to be a nonce.

Ah the fog clears! Because this time it is our liberty on the front line Nicos. I don't say this lightly.

Mi6? No, this was a direct result of the 7/7 bombers. I'm not saying that exonerates the police of responsibility by any means however. Yes Mi6. Grow up man. We'll all have to....and soon.

Aye, I don't think you can really blame the people that actually shot him, criminally at least (whether they should remain in the same jobs though ), even though they could/should have done things better/properly. The real issue is the blatant cover up that rolled almost immediately into place (and still rolled on in this enquiry) and that NO ONE at any level has taken any real proportion of blame at all. It's been a master-class in the art of disappearing responsibility and not my fault-ism. Which is just plain repellent, and of course means that it's likely that in a similar situation the same mistakes might well be make again. They let him get to the tube station and then they shot him.

Mi6? No, this was a direct result of the 7/7 bombers. I'm not saying that exonerates the police of responsibility by any means however. Yes Mi6.

Crush all opposition and tactically buy out all land competitors might set up upon and mothball it? The Microsoft of the groceries world. Survival of the fittest and all that.... Or do you suggest they should all say "no, after you..."?