-
Posts
35323 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by Park Life
-
Trainspotters being stopped under anti-terror powers
Park Life replied to Fop's topic in General Chat
It's all just conspiracy theories pay no mind. -
You know something is wrong with the world when the football board becomes more surreal and unbelievable than the hippy/new age board you loiter on.
-
Israel continues its merciless pounding of the defenceless.
Park Life replied to Park Life's topic in General Chat
The reason they continue to try and fight back is cause Israel is trying to suffocate them and starve them. They have limited access to water (just trucks sometimes), inability to travel, food shortages, money issues and on and on...UN is joke. -
-
Israel continues its merciless pounding of the defenceless.
Park Life replied to Park Life's topic in General Chat
Israeli soldiers smash up house and mother killed. Watch before UTube deletes. -
He was mever really worth 2 billion, in reality it was 1.2 billion ish.
-
Israel continues its merciless pounding of the defenceless.
Park Life replied to Park Life's topic in General Chat
These are aspects of state terrorism at its worst, with the so called moral leaders of the EU sitting around twiddling thier thumbs. Get some fucking aid in there at least ffs!! -
Hamas secret weapon?
-
She needs one of your special wrestles.
-
-
Is this a police hack?
-
Israel continues its merciless pounding of the defenceless.
Park Life replied to Park Life's topic in General Chat
The crux of the problem is Hamas need to get bigger fucking rockets. Zip it Adolf! -
The man is clearly bufoon. Then we can safely sell Given after all. Hurrah! Perhaps we haven't yet found the bottom of Ashley buffoonery.
-
Israel continues its merciless pounding of the defenceless.
Park Life replied to Park Life's topic in General Chat
The crux of the problem is Hamas need to get bigger fucking rockets. -
The man is clearly bufoon.
-
so basically the police are "scriptkiddies" with trojans/rootkits... good luck with that having to send someone a file and hoping they run it so you can get into the pc is not "hacking" fuck sake you might as well send them a copy of vnc and ask them to install it for you. What are the main lines of defence Anty? Not opening a file in an email saying "Hi heres my nudepic.jpg.....................................................exe" Honestly common sense is worth a lot more than any antivirus etc. If you keep your system up to date and don't mindlessly click though things you download of limewire and the like you'll generally be fine. most people get infected with things because something has popped up and they've clicked "yes agree install" just to get it off the screen. But won't they have super hackers? I'd say its more likely former PCWorld technicians. network security buffs don't work in the public sector, they get paid a fortune and have meetings in the alps inbetween snowboarding sessions Another reason global warming is a good thing.
-
so basically the police are "scriptkiddies" with trojans/rootkits... good luck with that having to send someone a file and hoping they run it so you can get into the pc is not "hacking" fuck sake you might as well send them a copy of vnc and ask them to install it for you. What are the main lines of defence Anty? Not opening a file in an email saying "Hi heres my nudepic.jpg.....................................................exe" Honestly common sense is worth a lot more than any antivirus etc. If you keep your system up to date and don't mindlessly click though things you download of limewire and the like you'll generally be fine. most people get infected with things because something has popped up and they've clicked "yes agree install" just to get it off the screen. But won't they have super hackers?
-
Maybe he spoke to the agent. To be fair you could type "Who is Barry Ferguson?" into Google and then say you enquired about him.
-
so basically the police are "scriptkiddies" with trojans/rootkits... good luck with that having to send someone a file and hoping they run it so you can get into the pc is not "hacking" fuck sake you might as well send them a copy of vnc and ask them to install it for you. What are the main lines of defence Anty?
-
Wonder what Foppenstien has to say on the matter.
-
He could do a mean Jacko pirouette thats for sure.
-
Police Set to Step Up Hacking of Home PCs As per the United Kingdom Sunday Times paper on 4th of jan 2009. THE Home Office has quietly adopted a new plan to allow police across Britain routinely to hack into people’s personal computers without a warrant. The move, which follows a decision by the European Union’s council of ministers in Brussels, has angered civil liberties groups and opposition MPs. They described it as a sinister extension of the surveillance state which drives “a coach and horses” through privacy laws. The hacking is known as “remote searching”. It allows police or MI5 officers who may be hundreds of miles away to examine covertly the hard drive of someone’s PC at his home, office or hotel room. Material gathered in this way includes the content of all e-mails, web-browsing habits and instant messaging. Under the Brussels edict, police across the EU have been given the green light to expand the implementation of a rarely used power involving warrantless intrusive surveillance of private property. The strategy will allow French, German and other EU forces to ask British officers to hack into someone’s UK computer and pass over any material gleaned. A remote search can be granted if a senior officer says he “believes” that it is “proportionate” and necessary to prevent or detect serious crime — defined as any offence attracting a jail sentence of more than three years. However, opposition MPs and civil liberties groups say that the broadening of such intrusive surveillance powers should be regulated by a new act of parliament and court warrants. They point out that in contrast to the legal safeguards for searching a suspect’s home, police undertaking a remote search do not need to apply to a magistrates’ court for a warrant. Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, the human rights group, said she would challenge the legal basis of the move. “These are very intrusive powers – as intrusive as someone busting down your door and coming into your home,” she said. “The public will want this to be controlled by new legislation and judicial authorisation. Without those safeguards it’s a devastating blow to any notion of personal privacy.” She said the move had parallels with the warrantless police search of the House of Commons office of Damian Green, the Tory MP: “It’s like giving police the power to do a Damian Green every day but to do it without anyone even knowing you were doing it.” Richard Clayton, a researcher at Cambridge University’s computer laboratory, said that remote searches had been possible since 1994, although they were very rare. An amendment to the Computer Misuse Act 1990 made hacking legal if it was authorised and carried out by the state. He said the authorities could break into a suspect’s home or office and insert a “key-logging” device into an individual’s computer. This would collect and, if necessary, transmit details of all the suspect’s keystrokes. “It’s just like putting a secret camera in someone’s living room,” he said. Police might also send an e-mail to a suspect’s computer. The message would include an attachment that contained a virus or “malware”. If the attachment was opened, the remote search facility would be covertly activated. Alternatively, police could park outside a suspect’s home and hack into his or her hard drive using the wireless network. Police say that such methods are necessary to investigate suspects who use cyberspace to carry out crimes. These include paedophiles, internet fraudsters, identity thieves and terrorists. The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) said such intrusive surveillance was closely regulated under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act. A spokesman said police were already carrying out a small number of these operations which were among 194 clandestine searches last year of people’s homes, offices and hotel bedrooms. “To be a valid authorisation, the officer giving it must believe that when it is given it is necessary to prevent or detect serious crime and [the] action is proportionate to what it seeks to achieve,” Acpo said. Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, agreed that the development may benefit law enforcement. But he added: “The exercise of such intrusive powers raises serious privacy issues. The government must explain how they would work in practice and what safeguards will be in place to prevent abuse.” The Home Office said it was working with other EU states to develop details of the proposals.
-
Maybe he spoke to the agent. Wouldn't that be tapping-up? I'm sure we wouldn't be nefarious like that. Are you allowed to use words like that? My top 10 films of 2008 will be up later.
-
Maybe he spoke to the agent.