peasepud

http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?showtopic=28915 Also, wasn't it you who constantly use the term "back him or sack him", so he sacks him, and you criticise You dont half miss the point sometimes, firstly that thread you link to is LM saying hes worried about relegation not that Hughton is shite. The point you show in bold above is a massive factor. Nobody could expect to do well with the resources Hughton had and yet he managed to exceed expectations. That doesnt mean we all thought we were heading for the Champions League you can still have respect for what the manager does but be worried about relegation. Secondly, I dont believe LMs "back him or sack him" is a call for his head its pointing out the fact that a chairman has to have faith in the man he appointed because lets not forget this is Ashleys appointment not someone hes been lumbered with as Allardyce was.

Ye can't say that Peter fuckin hell. If someone offered you the chance to be a pornstar would you say nar, cos that's the analogy Pedro would be faced with. Beardsleys dislike of Hughton isnt a great secret and like Bird says hes spent 3 years kissing the arse of Ashley slowly moving himself further up the chain. Should he manage to get a result on Saturday Id say hes nailed on to get the job full time. Then lets see how well we do for transfers etc when the manager is a bloke who backed the chairman over what was supposed to be his mate. Players will be bought and sold by the chairman and the manager will take whatever with a grin and a comedy "obviously".

And no doubt many of the same people will give him another chance as soon as the first manager records a win.

Like he did with KK you mean? I was more meaning some kitty for the new man in January as opposed to the nowt Hughton had coming. Or he could say you get x amount salary but you have to work with what you have til the summer 2014. Or we might get Pardew. FYP

Use this thread to talk about Twitter rumours & other discussions relating to twitter - do not clutter the forums or other threads with posts in relation to twitter hearsay. In regards to potential transfers mentioned by a newspaper or a reputable journalist or television news show please discuss it in The Transfer Thread (2011)

At this moment and it fucking pains me to say it but....

I have to say I detest Llambias even more than Ashley, you can imagine him having a little smirk to himself after waving Chris off this afternoon.

Sad to say but Id have no respect for Pedro if he took over full time. No doubt the great unwashed will be shouting about Geordie Saviours and all that shite.

Chris Hughton

Ahh well at least its not someone who knows what theyre talking about.

I hope we end up with a Scum type scenario, where Joey Barton beats the shit out of Ashley with a sock full of snooker balls. Thats not the scene Im hoping Ashley gets.

I have no doubts that Hughton will go on to manage another Premiership club in the very near future, probably one of our relegation opponents so we're screwed basically.

where's that from? I dunno but I reckon it was sent by telegraph.

Ahhh but we can wax lyrically about Plymouth and Fulham though.

No doubt they will at the end of the month when they stick in transfer requests. Fat man laughs all the way to the bank "heads turned" etc etc

Not sure why the "Sorry" as I didnt take anything dodgy from your post? The term rabble rousers is how the chair refers to any members who have questioned the current position and he has been quoted as stating that hes not bothered if the memberships drop because it'll mainly be the rabble rousers that leave. In the beginning NUSC started out as a full on protest group however a few weeks in and a number of us realised that wasnt going to get us anywhere so we worked to move to more of a toned down stance. That group included Mark J, Michael Martin and one or two others disagreed which is where the arguments at the last meeting arose. The problem now though isnt a difference in opinion on such a big scale as protest/dont protest but simply a case of Jensen having such a high opinion of himself as Mr Liverpool Newcastle that no other fan/ board member/ Trust member could possibly know better than him therefore he refuses to even listen to an alternative view. Thats the issue, we are now being taken down the MJ route regardless of whether its sensible, logical or what is best for NUST/ NUFC. Exactly, that was what my Election manifesto talked about, unfortunately (for me not necessarily the Trust) people voted based on YWC and the dream of owning the club.

I knew it was too good to be true, weve gone too long now without a Ashley/ Llambias fuck up so just to address the balance they do the most moronic thing they could in this situation. All it would take now would be to renew Smiths contract......... Llambias you're a total and utter fucking tool. Cue Kinnear spouting off any time now about how hes lined up and would have won us the WC2018 bid if he'd been in charge.

In what way do you mean? The problem at the moment is that the board refuse to listen to any views of the members or even certain committee members. They are doing everything they can to try and get out of holding an AGM even though it is a mandatory requirement of being a Trust. Theres also a lot of very dodgy rumours flying around, some of them will surely be crap but some of them look very dodgy when reviewed alongside certain decisions being made by the chair. Feel free to come on here and refute them though Mr J. Like I say they are rumours and Ive not repeated them so Solicitors threats wont work here. The rabble rousers are basically anyone who questions the decisions or direction of the Trust. I guess that includes me and Tom then Yes, see my statement above on very dodgy rumours.

Ive told you before his personal life is all over the place. I dont think his minds on the game at all.

http://twitter.com/DianaInHeaven

Really? nope, a total and utter fabrication (although a legitimate one) 30,000 signed up to the email newsletter and were quite cleverly classed as members. The number of actual paying members was somewhere around the 2000 mark. As Tom has said, individually we have fuck all chance they'll merely ignore us on the belief that we'll get bored and walk away. As the chairs logic stands, so what if they dont renew? they're just rabble rousers anyway. Collectively though we have enough power to force the issue. 10% of the membership signing up for an EGM and it has to happen, once there then they have to answer the questions. Its at that point the members present can make their minds up what the truth is and vote them in or out. Theyre arrogant enough to believe it cant be done, well it can as long as we all work to make as many members as possible aware of the situation.

Basically summed up in 2 sentences but its not NUST as an entity, its three people who have built themselves an empire and surrounded themselves with people who'll agree whatever they do. There are/were good people on the board who just wanted NUFC fans to have representation, who just wanted to create something that fans could be part of and feel proud to be associated with. An EGM is not far away, as soon as we know the numbers required it'll be organised and then the shit really will hit the fan.

Excellent post from someone on the forum

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north-east-...72703-27762301/

Dress down Friday wasnt a great success.