Kevin Carr's Gloves

Unashamedley sentimental to USA standards but I am at work bored crapless. A wounded team was limping home one dark and rainy day. They left their hero on the bench they didn’t let them play. When all at once a shout went up a makem goal was scored. A city hung its head in shame and inside they roared. And then a sillouette appeared above the city sky. A manager of untold class a proud and noble guy. He’d taken teams to glory in countries far and wide. And now he had come home at last to lead this team to pride. Yippy yi yo Yippy yi yay Sir Bobby comes to save the day Yippy yi yo Yippy yi yay Sir Bobby comes to save the day He picked up this broken shattered club like a young chick in his hand. And brought them back to winning ways all around the land. Under his brave leadership the city again thrives. The fans will not forget this man for all of their lives. Yippy yi yay yippy yi yo We were sad to see him go Yippy yi yay yippy yi yo We were sad to see him go

When the dust settles and posterity looks back on the time of NUFC I hope it puts SBR where he deserves to be, at the top and in the hearts of the people.

That's an open invitation to get ye sel doon the Reiperbahn It means breaking all those promises I made to mesel. Trying to cut down on your 3am Hesburger intake, eh? Still stand by Burger King. Had my first ever burger king in Hamburg.

Yup, he was convicted of sexual assault (several times) and rape (and two other reports of it), so no chance. As a completely amateur psychiatrist, I think however despicable sexual assaults or rapes obviously are, they show a different line of interest in someone than knocking on their door and shooting them dead. Amatuer being the right word. As a stalker / rapist he is motivated by feelings of power over his victims. As a stalker he could feel he is emotionally attached to his stalkee. If at any time he feels betrayed by his stalkee by her getting engaged perhaps then feelings of vengence could motivate him to commit straight murder.

On the bright side despite our woeful form we still aren't really falling that far behind.

these are my levi stubbs tears. Rip for now i will here you again tomorrow.

Yes because it's obviously true. The amount of people ready to have a pop at Keegan is disgraceful iyam. I wasn't having a pop moron.

you cant polish a turd.

this explains his silence on the subject.

Might be considered racist but the "Basil Fawlty is our friend" one against Barca was funny as was the "we're supposed to be at work" one.

Apparently comedically gifted Wales their 2 goals in the under 21 game tonight.

Actually the surrounding area is beautiful and we found this amazing pub which served the best carvery and cans of pussy. But the town centre on the weekend was more like Blackpool than the riviera.

The Robledo brothers.

Cant remember the year but it was against Leicester I think we drew 0-0 I think it was the year after Withe left. Bad memory.

This from a cocksucking dwarf

The financial markets are way beyond the credit crunch now. I would predict that January will be a very quiet transfer window this year. A lot of clubs out there are living year by year by reservicing debt of huge amounts over short terms. This will start to slow down as banks do not have the money to support this kind of refinancing. I can see Manutd being in a bit of trouble along with Arsenal and West Ham and Pompey being completely fucked.

Went to Torquay for a few days in the summer with the wife. Out of respect for yourself I will not post a review of the place.

Thought so. More I like it my way, but no one else's. You're completely missing the point of freedom. Deserve has nothing to do with it. Politeness is nice, but you can have polite oppression, tranny and murder. I get it. You don't like limitations on what you can and can't do, what you can and can't say - and you view religion as one of the major restrictions on your so-called freedom. No problem. It's your life. I just don't see why you insist on trying to impose this view on everyone else. Can't you see that it's self-contradictory? Doesn't freedom mean the ability to choose one's own way? So how can you force someone to be free? If everyone's free, going back to an example you attempted in an earlier argument, shouldn't that mean people should be "free" to wear religious symbols in university? I mean, it's their choice. It doesn't affect you (unless, of course, it offends you. But that's a debate for another time.) But you've already stated it should be banned. So here you are, ready to demand the protection of what you consider to be your freedom but equally ready to say what others can and can't do. It's ironic that you of all people would accuse me of trying to have my cake and eat it too. So it's ok for us Westerners to criticise others' practices, but when they start doing it, it's hate speech and terrorism. It's free speech when radicals here attack such things as FGM, child marriage, honor killing (which, disgusting and out-dated as they may seem to you, have been part of their culture for centuries. And who cares if it's disgusting to you? They're supposed to be free as well - or does that freedom only extend to white people?) but when the radicals on the other side of the world attack things in the West that they consider to be equally disgusting, it's not allowed. When your morals are offended, it's an outrage. But when their morals are offended - like those who found the Satanic Verses offensive - you don't care. Why? Are their morals, or their outrage, somehow less important than yours? Who decides that? You're another one who wants it both ways. Freedom without boundaries is meaningless. And who sets those boundaries again? the majority will of the people. Its called democracy. Does my neighbour have the right to play loud music any time of the night? does that mean I only have the right to listen to that music? Do I have the right to kill. Does that mean people have the right to be killed. Does having the right to circumcised my daughter mean she has the right to be circumcised? Does she have the right to object? Freedoms of individuals rarely coincide with the freedoms of society to live freely and without fear.

It's on the windowsill, a good distance away from the water! I thought this through. Got a dvd on whilst I'm having a soak. Are you listening to Kenny Gee at the same time you big fairy. Men shower!!!

Thought so. More I like it my way, but no one else's. You're completely missing the point of freedom. Deserve has nothing to do with it. Politeness is nice, but you can have polite oppression, tranny and murder. I get it. You don't like limitations on what you can and can't do, what you can and can't say - and you view religion as one of the major restrictions on your so-called freedom. No problem. It's your life. I just don't see why you insist on trying to impose this view on everyone else. Can't you see that it's self-contradictory? Doesn't freedom mean the ability to choose one's own way? So how can you force someone to be free? If everyone's free, going back to an example you attempted in an earlier argument, shouldn't that mean people should be "free" to wear religious symbols in university? I mean, it's their choice. It doesn't affect you (unless, of course, it offends you. But that's a debate for another time.) But you've already stated it should be banned. So here you are, ready to demand the protection of what you consider to be your freedom but equally ready to say what others can and can't do. It's ironic that you of all people would accuse me of trying to have my cake and eat it too. So it's ok for us Westerners to criticise others' practices, but when they start doing it, it's hate speech and terrorism. It's free speech when radicals here attack such things as FGM, child marriage, honor killing (which, disgusting and out-dated as they may seem to you, have been part of their culture for centuries. And who cares if it's disgusting to you? They're supposed to be free as well - or does that freedom only extend to white people?) but when the radicals on the other side of the world attack things in the West that they consider to be equally disgusting, it's not allowed. When your morals are offended, it's an outrage. But when their morals are offended - like those who found the Satanic Verses offensive - you don't care. Why? Are their morals, or their outrage, somehow less important than yours? Who decides that? You're another one who wants it both ways. Freedom without boundaries is meaningless.

1. Spurs relegated 2. A ref actually booking a top 4 player for dissent. 3. Man utd folding due to their 850 million debt being called in. 4. Something bad happening to west ham horrible fans. 5. Ditto for portsmouth.

They should rename pregnancy as the driving my drunk partner every where period.

The mother of Henry VII was 12 when she fell pregnant with him.

Cider I no longer enjoy the taste of lager.

Surely members of the clergy should be branded " I am a filthy pedo who likes to fuck kids" may be suitable.