Kevin Carr's Gloves

Cunt shouldn't be a tory if he wants sympathy.

Currently part time prisoner movement controller for SPS. Also at Uni studying to be a history teacher.

I understand your point but how much does it cost to release press statements questioning Ashley's motives in the sale of the club? How about contacting the FA to question Ashley's motives now that he has said he doesn't want the club. How much money has he lost lately in the credit crunch?

Couldn't be bothered to find the original thread. Where are they and what are they doing?

I dont understand the problem. The constitutional amendment does not mention guns but allows the right to bear arms. Fucking moronic Americans. Why not just say that the only arms allowed are piss weak air rifles. And it was written over 200 years ago. I hate codified constitutions.

Glad you said that dont feel as bad pointing out I thought you meant he was at MFI and wondered if he was like getting crushed in the rush or something. Doing essays and my head is battered.

This is shit. I an glad we have NUSC being our voice and attacking the fat cockney ones running of our club using their press connections and that. Makes that joining fee very worth while.

medicine hat! I behaved very badly there for a few months in 1988.

The problem with the government is that they are unwilling to deal with the lack of alternatives and just want to stop people or if you are a little cynical make money. Public transport is still gash so there is no real alternative to car journeys in many areas.

You should do this for every conversation with any call centre.

You are a complete joke. When did the bit in bold occur? If you have no common sense or national awareness, I suggest you just shut the fuck up. As for the signs, none of them are in Punjabi, they are in sylheti (Bangladeshi). When you talk shiet about football, you can get away with it. But here, please just keep quiet. Bangladeshi, Punjabi who gives a fuck, no wonder there's so many racist cunts in London. Muslim fuckin street signs fuck off. As for football you support a team from a city, you've never stepped foot in, in a sport that people from your culture despite having a population have NEVER produced ONE decent footballer, so I suggest you pipe down about that. Baitung Bhutia of Bury, the highest profile player in the history of a country with 1,000,000,000 people. You fucking wet behind the ears twat. As for the bit I've put in bold you little non-entity cunt... SCUM If we could turn back time.... There is much anger in him. No anger at all. Just disappointment at how much England has changed. I think you're a magician, you make 3000 posts full of words and manage to say nothing. I could say I have found your posts full of nothing but bile and ignorance. Is that better? I could say I have found your posts full of nothing but tediousness and arrogance. Is that better? Yes thats much better thanks.

I'm not sure that's entirely true (the latest tax band fiasco - firmly aimed at the voters in "middle earner" class), they have fiddled the books a lot though, hence the disappearance of long term unemployed and the explosion of long term sick (which has now reached the point where even they are shitting themselves over it). Whether its entirely true is arguable but the point was to compare and contrast with the tax structures inhereited from the tories rather than to judge new labour's fiscal policy independently. Well neither dare tax the super rich or big companies, and neither probably ever will. That doesnt really disprove the point either though does it? That New Labour and the Conservatives are essentially the same? The quote in the centre that you were seeking to contradict. That New Labour and the Conservatives are essentially the same? Apart from their tax policy to low income families, aye. Which made 2,000,000 low income people worse off (hence the mass political panic when people actually got their pay packets). And you say i pull statistics out me arse? You do. I always link to the source. You just scratch yours. However if you paid attention to the UK and its taxation you should already know what I'm saying was true (pre-panic anyway). About low income families being targeted by policies in 1999 and 2001? As thats what we are talking about, as in the centre of this post. I've not been following your side points enough to even know what you're saying Links to these 2 years of ground breaking policies please (if it was just "get a credit card", then I don't want to know ). I don't doubt they said something, but they said a lot of things that never amounted to what they claimed (the BBC has done an entire series of articles on Labours broken promises ). I would hope they would have entire series of articles about every british governments broken promises.

You are a complete joke. When did the bit in bold occur? If you have no common sense or national awareness, I suggest you just shut the fuck up. As for the signs, none of them are in Punjabi, they are in sylheti (Bangladeshi). When you talk shiet about football, you can get away with it. But here, please just keep quiet. Bangladeshi, Punjabi who gives a fuck, no wonder there's so many racist cunts in London. Muslim fuckin street signs fuck off. As for football you support a team from a city, you've never stepped foot in, in a sport that people from your culture despite having a population have NEVER produced ONE decent footballer, so I suggest you pipe down about that. Baitung Bhutia of Bury, the highest profile player in the history of a country with 1,000,000,000 people. You fucking wet behind the ears twat. As for the bit I've put in bold you little non-entity cunt... SCUM If we could turn back time.... There is much anger in him. No anger at all. Just disappointment at how much England has changed. I think you're a magician, you make 3000 posts full of words and manage to say nothing. I could say I have found your posts full of nothing but bile and ignorance. Is that better? I could also say you cant read or cant count how about that? I could say that you have seemed nothing more than a xenophobe with no idea of history or society how does that sound? Stiil not hearing anything then I suggest in future just ignore my posts and I will try and do the same with yours.

You are a complete joke. When did the bit in bold occur? If you have no common sense or national awareness, I suggest you just shut the fuck up. As for the signs, none of them are in Punjabi, they are in sylheti (Bangladeshi). When you talk shiet about football, you can get away with it. But here, please just keep quiet. Bangladeshi, Punjabi who gives a fuck, no wonder there's so many racist cunts in London. Muslim fuckin street signs fuck off. As for football you support a team from a city, you've never stepped foot in, in a sport that people from your culture despite having a population have NEVER produced ONE decent footballer, so I suggest you pipe down about that. Baitung Bhutia of Bury, the highest profile player in the history of a country with 1,000,000,000 people. You fucking wet behind the ears twat. As for the bit I've put in bold you little non-entity cunt... SCUM If we could turn back time.... There is much anger in him.

There is nothing to support your view that society was better with better moral values and social order at the beginning of the 20th century. There were high levels of crime and drug use from the 19th century up til after the first world war. There were also high levels of crime with commentators of the day complaining about crime families controlling inner city areas. Also you have to consider the actions of government and corporate owners who were quite happy to work people into there graves with little or no reward. The only difference between then and now is the level of media intrusion and the inevitable problems which come from overpopulation. I've bolded the bit where i accepted that this is not something you can say incontrovertibly so your point is well taken. I wouldn't say there was 'nothing to support' the view though. Crime existing at a significant level in the early parts of the 20th century does not indicate that it was at the same level as it is today, nor that it has risen or fallen. I don't think i implied society was better either, i was trying to make a point about social order and contrast the existence of the apparent (according to the media) 'Underclass' today with previous generations and reflect what the elder generations of my family say to me. My Gran is 99 now and as lucid as she was 30 years ago. She would support my view that the 'social constraints' (freedoms in the OP) hardly exist today compared to 100 years ago. I don't doubt that society had many many problems 100 years ago and perhaps you are right, such an underclass may have existed then. It was the time of the great social projects, the rise of Labour and ultimately, once the wars were out of the way, the NHS. These political changes imply a massive amount of poverty and social need. The question at the heart of this is whether presented with the same opportunities that the current generation have, would the people from 100 years ago have embraced the 'benefits' culture or sought to better themselves? It is the problem of grouping the people as some heterogenous (sp) entity. I have no doubt a lot of them would have grabbed it with open arms. But some like today would prefer the sense of achievment that work gives. Although I think there may be something in the lack of achievment the working classes have in work nowadays in the service industry. We are not a creative society anymore. In the past a launching of a ship on the tyne or the clyde would give workers something tangible to aim to. Nowadays who gives a crap how many people can call their friends on their mobile phine. Dont get me wrong I do believe there are some scum out there. You should have seen the looks I got off some catholic friends here in Glasgow when I told them I not only agreed with abortion but thought in some cases it should be compulsory.

You are a complete joke. When did the bit in bold occur? If you have no common sense or national awareness, I suggest you just shut the fuck up. As for the signs, none of them are in Punjabi, they are in sylheti (Bangladeshi). When you talk shiet about football, you can get away with it. But here, please just keep quiet. Doing a paper on the general strike at the moment and after studying his actions for the dardanelles campaign in WWI I must say my opinion of Churchill has dropped dramatically.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. You would've been as fucked as Iceland. Not according to most economists. Like who? Andrew Hughes Hallett, professor of economics and public policy at George Mason University in Virginia and a visiting professor at St Andrews University for one. Most economists actually meant one economist then? I can't imagine why he'd be biased either. If you want me to name loads of economists who agree with me I can but it may take a while. And all economists are biased depending on who is paying for their advice.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. You would've been as fucked as Iceland. Not according to most economists. Like who? Andrew Hughes Hallett, professor of economics and public policy at George Mason University in Virginia and a visiting professor at St Andrews University for one.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. I think even Salmond wouldn't go that far at the moment. He's been very, very specific in his criticism recently (and very, very quiet on other subjects). Aye he has been too quiet. Too much reliance on activate our all conquering database and not on actual campaigning.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. You would've been as fucked as Iceland. Not according to most economists.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. My how witty and erudite you are.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british.

How weird a thread full of people spouting complete shite and it seems to be Stevie and Danny B spouting most of it. That never happens.

There is nothing to support your view that society was better with better moral values and social order at the beginning of the 20th century. There were high levels of crime and drug use from the 19th century up til after the first world war. There were also high levels of crime with commentators of the day complaining about crime families controlling inner city areas. Also you have to consider the actions of government and corporate owners who were quite happy to work people into there graves with little or no reward. The only difference between then and now is the level of media intrusion and the inevitable problems which come from overpopulation.

so glad we didnt get him now. Is there a manager out there really willing to adapt tactics to his squad and admit when they make mistakes and correct them? Or are they all arogant idiots? Is there a manager out there worth having?