Kevin Carr's Gloves

Surely the point was though they weren't fucking English. They were also brought in by Richard Coeur de Lion who spoke very little English and spent 3 months of his Life in England. He was however bisexual so must have liked a party.

There is so much wrong with that statement.

I heard there is one on tomorrow in Newcastle anyone going to shout abuse at the cockneys?

I boycotted it ages ago when Taylor wrote the shit about our chanting at Mido. I get the Indy now.

Dead now apparently. RIP I loved his show when I was a kid.

He was not our first Black player so why would we have protested against him anyway?

In general businesses has moved to India so they can use cheap employment, rather than avoid UK taxes, wouldn't you agree? So how would you stem this, by reducing the national wage to that of an average Indian? Please enlighten me. Under the last Labour government taxes have been very competitive with the rest of the Western world, whatever the Daily Mail might tell you. Also, didn't the Conservatives plan to levy non-doms as part of their manifesto? Not that I am necessarily against this, but it leaves your argument in as much tatters as your understanding of your payslip. Your fine with the 9 guys and a business sector goes to the pub, but not the reference to India. Feel free to change it to '10 goes out of business because the state bailed out banks wont lend any money at less than 18% APR' Regarding outsource, the issue has never been solely about cost savings. We are losing businesses because they have no reason to stay. I mentioned increasing the broadband speed to 1GB. This would create a media sector businesses would flock too. Yes it is its all about cost saving. Why else would anyone move a customer service base to a country which does not have English as their first language. If I could I would disassociate myself from any company which had a call centre in India. I also think companies should be taxed for operating in Europe with important services based outside of EUrope.

If they have changed your pricing structure significantly they cant say no. And you know I am always at your service. Thats the thing about being a full grown man we can reaches the places other shorter people cant.

Write to them saying you want to cancel due to changes in your contract which mean a change in your pricing structure. You can call and tell them that is what you are going to do as well.

Well my guess is that we will sell Guti after the World Cup. Possibly even Enrique and Colo if the money is right. Then replace them with loanees, freebees or acadamees. Next season is just going to be the absolute best ever.

I fancy it but it's quite expensive to get to I think despite its proximity. Plus it'll be one of those dodgy SAS airline fokkers no doubt. Didn't Slartibartfast design the Fjords as well? It is also ridiculously expensive while over there as well. My uncle has family in Norway and when his family go he pavcks everyobodies suitcases with food and drink. My cousin said she was complaining the whole holiday because her clothes smelled of lamb.

Indeed... Didn't dare serve a writ on Murdoch last week though, did he? Isn't it true that he refused to take part in a BBC Scotland debate at the weekend? What a cock! No its not.

The current system allows a party to govern without checks by gaining the support of 31% of the country. That just is not right. The only other government in Europe which operates a system as unrepresentative as ours is France. It doesn't matter what kind of system you have as long as decently clever people with the right motives come to the top. Unfortunately I have to hope that would start to happen when total power was no longer on offer to twats.

Its shit.

I am 41 and heading for a stag do at Aviemore the end of this month. While the rest of the lads who are a bit younger than me are talking of monumental drinking sessions followed by lung bursting mountain biking I have told them I am just looking forward to a nice lie in wher my daughter does not get me up at 6 to watch Mickey Muse Clubhouse and Handy Manny. lol.

A white horse walks into a bar and the barman says "here we have a whisky named after you. The horse replies "you have a whisky named Jester"? How do you annoy Lady Gaga? Poke her face.

Freedom without boundaries is just a word. I am sure I read that somewhere.

Got the wife stuff from the little un and going to in laws for lunch. Got my Mum pyjamas but as she has vascular dementia she wont even know what they are.

Utter dribbling nonsense. The middle east was divided by religion. In 1921 as Secretary of State for the COlonies Churchill carved up the Middle East and chose members of Aristocratic Families to become the kings of the countries which made up Britains land Bridge to India. These included Iran, Iraq and Egypt. Part of the problems which led to the fall of the Shah and the ascension of the Islamic Republic was the simmering resentment of a ruler who did not belong. The same for the revolutions in Iraq and Egypt. Churchills actions have had serious repercussions since. No you've lost me. Britain (not Churchill, who was only a minister at the time) had been fucking about in the middle east since well before that. I also dont in any way see the connection between the installation of a leader who many nationalists consider the father of modern Iran and the issues in the middle east i.e. Jerusalem, Palestine, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, the crusades, the holy sites etc I'm very aware of Britain's role in the middle east but to blame 'many of the problems' in the region on Churchill is as i said. It was Churchills decision as Secretary of state for the Colonies to impose these people as rulers. What part of that do you not understand? The people of these countries were extremely unhappy as these rulers ran the countries for the benefit of themselves and Britain (later America who continued to prop up these unwanted governments) and so got pissed off and created revolutions which in Iran led to the Ayotollahs and in Iraq eventually led to the rule of Saddam Hussein. What part of that do you not understand? The bit where you blame the problems of the middle east on Churchill. See above.

Lad at my school shot his Mam and step Dad with a crossbow.

Utter dribbling nonsense. The middle east was divided by religion. In 1921 as Secretary of State for the COlonies Churchill carved up the Middle East and chose members of Aristocratic Families to become the kings of the countries which made up Britains land Bridge to India. These included Iran, Iraq and Egypt. Part of the problems which led to the fall of the Shah and the ascension of the Islamic Republic was the simmering resentment of a ruler who did not belong. The same for the revolutions in Iraq and Egypt. Churchills actions have had serious repercussions since. No you've lost me. Britain (not Churchill, who was only a minister at the time) had been fucking about in the middle east since well before that. I also dont in any way see the connection between the installation of a leader who many nationalists consider the father of modern Iran and the issues in the middle east i.e. Jerusalem, Palestine, Islam, Judaism, Christianity, the crusades, the holy sites etc I'm very aware of Britain's role in the middle east but to blame 'many of the problems' in the region on Churchill is as i said. It was Churchills decision as Secretary of state for the Colonies to impose these people as rulers. What part of that do you not understand? The people of these countries were extremely unhappy as these rulers ran the countries for the benefit of themselves and Britain (later America who continued to prop up these unwanted governments) and so got pissed off and created revolutions which in Iran led to the Ayotollahs and in Iraq eventually led to the rule of Saddam Hussein. What part of that do you not understand?

Woohoo I did the shit comprehensive / university degree route. So did I. I've noticed in recent years my old school has slid into even more shitness to the point where they're going to close it shortly. (It's already been merged once and about to be merged again with the new school having brand new premises somewhere between the two). Getting an A-Level at all is considered an achievement there now. Considering Blair's 'Education, education, education' campaign, this is an example of where it didn't go to plan. Neither did his plan to end child poverty, increase equality or be tough on crime tough on the causes of crime. I don't think he promised to not plunge us into an 'illegal' war based on lies so that ok.

Utter dribbling nonsense. The middle east was divided by religion. In 1921 as Secretary of State for the COlonies Churchill carved up the Middle East and chose members of Aristocratic Families to become the kings of the countries which made up Britains land Bridge to India. These included Iran, Iraq and Egypt. Part of the problems which led to the fall of the Shah and the ascension of the Islamic Republic was the simmering resentment of a ruler who did not belong. The same for the revolutions in Iraq and Egypt. Churchills actions have had serious repercussions since. Was that when he proposed gassing the Kurds as they were less than human or other such choice phrase? Edit: In the end they didn't use the gas for "technical reasons". Yes it was.

Utter dribbling nonsense. The middle east was divided by religion. In 1921 as Secretary of State for the COlonies Churchill carved up the Middle East and chose members of Aristocratic Families to become the kings of the countries which made up Britains land Bridge to India. These included Iran, Iraq and Egypt. Part of the problems which led to the fall of the Shah and the ascension of the Islamic Republic was the simmering resentment of a ruler who did not belong. The same for the revolutions in Iraq and Egypt. Churchills actions have had serious repercussions since.

Apparently also caused many of the problems in the Middle East which are still haunting us today.