sandman02uk

To answer the question, no, no he wont

I've just had to wipe my breakfast off my monitor you cahunt

to be honest ashley wouldn't fund even him

betting? get your money into BP nearly 50% wiped off the value, that wont last, quick money to be made there

Agree with Stevie there. On paper they're a better side but the opening game scenario / host nation makes it a funny one. Nah. They're odds-against which is good considering they're a far better side like. Germany v Serbia has got potential and I see Paraguay as the surprise team (for betting purposes) this time. I don't fancy meeting either of them in the last 16 Why not? We'd piss on them both. Croatia are proven better than both of them sides, and look what happened there. There's no unknown quantities at this World Cup, we have much better players than sides like that. Our World Cup starts in the Semi's. That's our judgement day. Would we fuck man, i get that your excited, so am I, but lets be honest here, by the last 16 we wont "piss" anyone

no and i haven't took the case off since I put some more RAM in about 2 years ago How much hard drive space you got free on your system drive?

Agree with Stevie there. On paper they're a better side but the opening game scenario / host nation makes it a funny one. Nah. They're odds-against which is good considering they're a far better side like. Germany v Serbia has got potential and I see Paraguay as the surprise team (for betting purposes) this time. I don't fancy meeting either of them in the last 16

Not sure how a shoulder injury, fall/twist like Rio, Drogbas fractured elbow, bad tackle on Ballack etc can be put down to tiredness though. Surely playing a higher number of games means theres a greater chance of picking up niggles that never heal properly or picking up something fairly serious none of those injuries have anything to do with "niggles" though More an example of things that can happen, obviously the tackle on Drogba and Ballack could of happened regardless of the number of games played

Not sure how a shoulder injury, fall/twist like Rio, Drogbas fractured elbow, bad tackle on Ballack etc can be put down to tiredness though. Surely playing a higher number of games means theres a greater chance of picking up niggles that never heal properly or picking up something fairly serious

you mean like Kieron Dyer, Laurent Robert, Craig Bellamy, James Milner, Charles N'Zogbia, Obafemi Martins, Scott Parker for starters.......remind yourself too that the specific player you mention, Damien Duff, left us for Fulham, yes Fulham, and has just played in a european Final while we have played in the 2nd division. Your "opinion" is trounced by facts mate. Boro got to that same European final Martins? The wages such an average player were earning were laughable. Scott Parker? You mean the player that got sold to accommodate Alan Smith by a man appointed by Shepherd? Dyer, paid thousands for 2 games a season? The other players you mentioned were signed by Bobby Robson, the only manager appointed whilst Shepherd was chairman that enjoyed any kind of success. Why talk about a small number of success stories that were clearly an expection to the rule? Sadly, one person owning less than 30% of shares doesn't run a football club on his own and make managerial appointments on his own either. Also unfortunately, no manager appointed by Mike Ashley will get anywhere near the success that Bobby Robson achieved, as did all the managers appointed by the predecessors to the Halls and Shepherd since the 1950's to put things into their correct perspective. Why do you talk about a small number of relative failures during the time of the Halls and Shepherd that were clearly an exception to the rule ? At the end of the day, we were the 5th most successful side during their time owning the club, with the 5th highest average league position, the 5th most qualified team for europe, converted a club that could not be sold for 2.5m quid into one that had the 14th biggest turnover in world football, transformed the stadium into one of the best in the country and filled it every home game, signed world class footballers including breaking the world transfer record, and attracted managers like Bobby Robson to the club in the first place when they were not interested previously preferring to spend his career at a club like Ipswich. All of that from having one foot in the 3rd division when they found it. If you seriously think you can undermine and undervalue all of this, look again at what has happened since they were bought out. But they managed to do all that and then fuck it all up though That's the point you're missing. We got the dizzy heights (without any trophies to show for it) but at the end of his reign we had just finished bottom half of the table, had an extortionate wage bill and are, because of their reign, debt ridden. The fact is they did all of those things by taking big financial risks that didn't pay off. The only thing that they can be credited for is ambition, but even then, they had their own motives at heart throughout. so you would rather not attempt it then ? Don't mock ambition, the current owner has none, just like most other clubs, which is what we are back to being, as we were pre-1992. Shame you don't see it. I wouldn't call playing regularly in europe, signing top players that we did, expanding and filling the stadium, "not paying off" but if you do, thats up to you. As for motives, doesn't everybody have their own motives in life, including you ? Are we pre-1992 because of the current owners lack of ambition or because of the previous owners wreckless ambition? A combination of both. Ashley is fucking terrible, but to use that fact to paint Shepherd in a good light is just bollocks Leazes, and you know it. The terrifying thing? He doesn't! under 30% of shares doesn't own the club. 5th most qualified team for europe, 5th highest average league position, 14th biggest turnover, expaned stadium filled to capacity, attracting top players and managers to the club. Can't argue with facts, if that is terrible, what is now and what is the 87 clubs who would have swapped places with us. A fair few of those 87 clubs could have swapped places with us had they chose to go shit-or-bust with future revenue. They had more responsible owners, however. rubbish. You have a "responsible owner" now. I hope you are happy with what has happened on the pitch under his ownership, the resulting fall in revenue, the lack of "trophy players" [laughable] and selling all our best players to smaller clubs than Newcastle United, the 3rd biggest supported club in the country. Newcastle Online is where you should be posting such shite, its full of tossers who also support the balance sheet instead of the football team. And the alternative was to continue to spend money that we didn't have and continue to get into more and more debt. Is that what you would prefer from a current owner, Leazes? you really ought to have a word with the trophy winning clubs, and tell them how they are getting it all wrong. And you should have a word with Portsmouth and tell them how they got it spot on!

Because he's black Yo!

that is really clever lol

I know few of us like the placement of the logos, however if you look at the adidas training top from last year it shows that an asymetrical placement can look good, the adidas logo is on the right breast and the newcastle logo is slightly below but in the centre

Spain England have built a side round Rooney and when he's not on song we are toothless, expect every team to try to mark him out the game

Why? Maybe he/she means The Troubles. What the hell does that have to do with Religon Actually I may of been unduly harsh there, it could be because the catholics and protestants are to busy each other, or it could be the irish priests like to over little boys eitherway

Why? Maybe he/she means The Troubles. What the hell does that have to do with Religon

aye the premiership is far to long, all the players are arseholed by the start

Nothing from what I can gather, also It doesn't mention anything about money thats loaned and written off (not sure what the correct terminology is) ie. where it doesn't need to be paid back

why would the home strip have the puma logo in the centre of the chest and the away strip over the right breast? the home strip looks unbalanced because of it, the away strip looks pretty good

Im a relapsed smoker. the simple answer is no. same, I stopped for 5years and for a time you do stop craving them, they just don't pop into the mind like the do when you smoke, however a sight, a smell, anything can remind you of something from your past when you smoked and the craving will it you like a freight train 5 years man and I've started again in the last 3 weeks, what a wanker!!

Isn't the paralympic mascot the one with the really short arms?

Only been a couple of times a few years ago. More of a gentleman club vibe. Table service, quite dark lighting and the girls wander the room. Remember it being quite small and so is the stage. Hmm sounds a bit shit. Apparently that Officers Deck is now called Pussy Galores... £20 for a full nude lap dance. Seems a bit frigging expensive that like?! Cheaper than having to pay for your lasses hair to get done though The guys got a point, 96 bastard quid like

Aye it maybe dell but its still impressive, God awful is alittle unfair The Panel is stunning, blows my LCD out the water and when pushign 1080p its jaw droppingly pretty

you lunatic. I prefer the schoolyard system. 2 3 175 works a treat. you would have 20 keepers?