Tom

I think im gonna kill myself

Same here I ocassionaly wonder if god has cursed me

Tramp Tbh

lol

Leazes wont comment on this thread though, will he?

Thats serious man

Given the abuse I'd receive, I'm not stupid enough to post a link. Pm me it. I will not distribute the link. Promise.

Hes shying from it

Wheres the one with brock in it?

Genius, pure Unfiltered genius.

Leazes?

Where art thou Leazes? Bring fourth your wisdom...

Not a chance mate! Wouldn't pay over £30 for a pair of jeans... H & M all the way! Too right, too. 'Posh jeans' seems almost a contradiction in terms. yea because jeans were made to work in

Well i gues its more use than Bramble. How much was it? I cant see it having the pace people are on about like

Well now the SJH says it

I thought bramble cost us £6m. Im sure of it

Leazes Mag will love that one. Worthwhile article as it was from a neutral perspective. Sheperd has been shite, apart from the funding which has been good. Shame where the money went though [increbidbly depressed/]

Happy birthday man

Does anyone know any incontrovertable happy music

I dunno.. that last one doesnt sound too much fun

It'll rot your stomach before it kills you. I've got girl flu I feel for you petal I have had it bliddy twice in two months....jamas, hot water bottle, hot toddy n paracetomol....physician heal thyself Hmm, I'm at work so that's not going to happen. I think it's my own fault as I had a bit of an excessive weekend. Is paracetamol better? Death by paracetamol is very nasty. You don't actually die til several days later once your liver packs up. Anyway!! Stop thinking of ways to kill yourself! Aspirin?

eeerrr...sorry mate, if you look you will see that I was responding to PP bringing it up. And I think it is pretty clear. And I have explained it before. If you don't understand the concept of showing how easily replacing the current board could backfire badly and NUFC are not immune to it then you need a reality check too, unfortunately. Just who exactly is these mystery backers who will have the good of the club at heart and guarantee to win the trophies we have a right to, will always appoint the "right" manager, always have a "plan" [we won't mention Bobby Robson staying 5 years, the youth scheme started by Dalglish which has hardly been a success and the revamped stadium and new training complex will we ?] and guarantee permanent european football to boot ? Do you think the club should stick with Roeder to show they have a "plan" ? Or should they have stuck with Souness and the "plan" ? Serious question. Wouldn't have had to hire either in the first place if they had a 'plan'. what sort of "plan" are you talking about ? Is a 3 or 4 year contract not a "plan" ? What you are talking about is making a poor appointment, then having to sack him. This happens at all clubs. All managers are judged on results. They are all appointed with a hope they will do 5 years or more or whatever, but the vast majority don't. Bobby Robson did 5 years. So did Keegan. These weren't "plans", they were managers who got good results. If Shearer is really being earmarked as a manager in a year or two or earlier, is this a "plan" ? Yes or no ? And if he fucks up in his first 6 months and doesn't look like he is up to it, will you then say the club should stick to its "plan" or will you still be saying the club doesn't have one. It is highly amusing the people on here who trot out the same cliches, without having a mind of your own, fook knows why, because the absolute reality is that the manager himself determines the time he stays at a club and nothing else plays any part whatsoever. I happens at Newcastle too much in recent years, Gullit was a mistake - Daglish died on his arse and sold a lot of good players. Robson - good call but sacked too late. Souness - Everybody could see it was going to end in tears. Roeder - Easy way out, fans ignored, easy way out of a difficult decision. Shit board. Shit decisions. I am pleased you think that appointing a manager who had won 4 championships, 2 FA Cups and 3 manager of the year awards was a mistake. Perhaps you would like to explain your criteria for appointing managers ? I take it another one who won the FA Cup with his first job, leaving his team in the last 16 of the European Cup and a Champions League spot in the league, is also a crap CV in your eyes ? daft comment, not true and only said by bairns I'm afraid All worked about brilliant in the end eh? We are the laughing stock of the premiership because people expect us to perform and so do we.

Doesnt matter that much

It'll rot your stomach before it kills you. I've got girl flu I feel for you petal I have had it bliddy twice in two months....jamas, hot water bottle, hot toddy n paracetomol....physician heal thyself Hmm, I'm at work so that's not going to happen. I think it's my own fault as I had a bit of an excessive weekend. Is paracetamol better?

eeerrr...sorry mate, if you look you will see that I was responding to PP bringing it up. And I think it is pretty clear. And I have explained it before. If you don't understand the concept of showing how easily replacing the current board could backfire badly and NUFC are not immune to it then you need a reality check too, unfortunately. Just who exactly is these mystery backers who will have the good of the club at heart and guarantee to win the trophies we have a right to, will always appoint the "right" manager, always have a "plan" [we won't mention Bobby Robson staying 5 years, the youth scheme started by Dalglish which has hardly been a success and the revamped stadium and new training complex will we ?] and guarantee permanent european football to boot ? Do you think the club should stick with Roeder to show they have a "plan" ? Or should they have stuck with Souness and the "plan" ? Serious question. Wouldn't have had to hire either in the first place if they had a 'plan'. what sort of "plan" are you talking about ? Is a 3 or 4 year contract not a "plan" ? What you are talking about is making a poor appointment, then having to sack him. This happens at all clubs. All managers are judged on results. They are all appointed with a hope they will do 5 years or more or whatever, but the vast majority don't. Bobby Robson did 5 years. So did Keegan. These weren't "plans", they were managers who got good results. If Shearer is really being earmarked as a manager in a year or two or earlier, is this a "plan" ? Yes or no ? And if he fucks up in his first 6 months and doesn't look like he is up to it, will you then say the club should stick to its "plan" or will you still be saying the club doesn't have one. It is highly amusing the people on here who trot out the same cliches, without having a mind of your own, fook knows why, because the absolute reality is that the manager himself determines the time he stays at a club and nothing else plays any part whatsoever. I happens at Newcastle too much in recent years, Gullit was a mistake - Daglish died on his arse and sold a lot of good players. Robson - good call but sacked too late. Souness - Everybody could see it was going to end in tears. Roeder - Easy way out, fans ignored, easy way out of a difficult decision. Shit board. Shit decisions. If not, then why are we the laughing stock of the premier league?