OTF

He's had some decent games in defense but it's the technical ability and passing of Coloccini coming out of defense that we'll miss most - plus the fact that we look so much better positionally with him out there, generally improves the composure of the entire team.

In all honesty we're lucky to get a point there. Coloccini's red is really really going to hurt us given we have a run of games coming up where we should be collecting some points.

Fuck! Red for Coloccini. Deserved. Probably.

Cisse had more time than he realised there.

Ba's first touch is generally much better than Cisse's. Excellent block from Taylor there. We're giving them too much space.

Shelvey embarrassingly poor there, spared some blushes for us.

Had to be that cunt didn't it.

Touch of the Shola's from Sammy... But somehow it's a corner...

Sterling kicking out from the ground twice there, impetuos little twat.

Enrique's passing has been horrid.

Not even a yellow for that. Tiote would have seen red.

Ba goes off with a knock replaced by Ameobi. Oddly enough HBA borrows Ba's gloves... Cutbacks eh.

Sprinkler went off in the stands... Can't be too much fun...

Nice time to get the goal (but what time isn't...). They look like they should be better than they are, but some real show ponies in their side still lacking leadership and potency in the final third. Carrying a few players who aren't particularly good by the looks as well.

Great goal!!!!! Wonderful mazy run... And the finish from Cabaye!

Couldn't half see that challenge coming from Jimmy.

Good string of passes. That's what we'll need to do more often to slow their initial enthusiastic closing down.

Suarez has to be one of the most detestable players in the history of the game.

Worse than Tiote's.

Mainly the ability to house 4 drives (as opposed to 2 in the 212j) it also has a faster CPU and more RAM. The j series is the more budget series so the 4 bay one doesn't look as nice as the others - but it's not ugly.

Don't think they will be.

You should separate yourself from other conspiracy theorists post haste. People on here are honestly trying to help you. People on there will feed your delusions and paranoia. You've said you're not on drugs and have never used drugs, well I have news for you, the forums and discussion boards that you frequent are your mind altering substance.

When you think about it and question things, wouldn't it be logical to believe an explanation that makes sense? It seems to me that you're discounting satellites to support theories that you believe (certainly not your own theories) about the faking of the moon landing, inability to travel in space etc etc. I'm not going to continue with this because it's pointless, though it was mildly entertaining for a while. Genuine question, and of course you don't have to answer it if you don't want to - Do you have a history of recreational drug use?

I've never used anything of the sort as reasons. You are picking and choosing what you want to believe as theory. You couldn't prove millions of processes that happen everday in your body and yet you will believe those only being witness to the end results. Conversely with satellites or nuclear power (and who knows what else) you can't make the same logical conclusions because in those situations you can invent some evil ulterior motive for reasons why the logical explanation cannot possibly be true. It's endemic of a paranoid psyche. I am showing you the end result and I am believeing the best, most logical explanation put forward with evidence spanning more than 50 years. Being that it is the prevalent and accepted explanation (by industry professionals. experts et al) then the onus is most certainly clearly on you to disprove it by showing it cannot possibly happen that way, and to present and prove with evidence an alternate explanation.

As the pioneering thinker* that you are the onus of proof is on you. We KNOW categorically that I can watch a game virtually simultaneously with people at the actual event. We KNOW that your explanation for it has been shown to not be feasible. The theory behind the satellite is sound, and so to disprove it you have two action items to undertake. 1. Prove that satellites do not exist 2. Provide a meaningful reason why there would be such a massive coverup lasting more than 50 years encompassing all nations * Conspiracy theory re-sprouter I don't expect that you will be able to do either of these things, but do expect that you will respond and feel that you have.