JonTheMag

end of the week... nailed on

Im on this betting site called centsports, where its free to bet, they give you 10 cents whenever you go down to 0, and once you reach $20 you can cash out. Anyway, over the last 2 weeks ive turned 10 cents into $14, all of which I now have riding on this game. So they better win.

And we thought Ashley was bad... Well he is, but still.

GET THE FOOK IN GOOOMBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Gutierrez - the free kick winning machine.

shouldve given it to smith, god knows he needs it

sack hughton, sell the players, we're getting relegated. FUCK!

Should play ----------Harper Simpson--Khiz--STaylor--Enrique Guthrie--Smith--Nolan--Lovenkrands ------------Ranger--Harewood--- Bring on Jonas and Carroll in the 65th for Lovenkrands and Harewood respectively, we'll win 1-0 with a pass from Jonas to set up Nolan in the 73rd minute.

We could be 8 points clear after Saturday. My god...

how much did you make off that?!

I think Guthrie could make it

*gag*

I bet the orange cunt's not dancing and singing now Id rather be a Geordie in the Championshiiiiip, than a sad orange mackem and a priiiiiick

Spain: Valencia and Atletico Madrid Germany: Werder Bremen Australia: NEWCASTLE JETS!!!

Its simple, put a small chip in the ball that activates the light whenever it crosses the sensor. Like those security things they have at supermarkets

Isnt Harewood more of a big tall target man instead of a shorty who runs around a lot? I could be wrong, but thats the impression I got

I agree and the time added was not even out of the ordinary, as proved on MOTD last night. With all the calls for technology being introduced, well I say fuck it, there's maybe 3 goals a season are over the line but aren't given, so what, there are maybe 5-10 controversial goals that have been scored over the alloted time, so fuck. Part of the charm of football is that it's largely the same rules we had 100 years ago, I don't see why technology has to play a massive part, if we keep altering the rules to accomodate technology and the right decision, where do we stop, do we end up with Americanised sport that has so many stops and starts, and is so scrutinised that we actually lose the sporting aspect? The referee and his assistance are not perfect, there are some decisions where occasionally you look at it, and you could argue that there is no right and no wrong, it's how it's interpreted, and I personally don't want to see the game taken away from human interpretation. I mostly agree, but I think something should be instituted for the issue of whether or not a ball crosses the line of the goal. That wouldnt slow the game down at all and could only help

carrolls goal was excellent

This isnt going to be televised, right?

I like having Guthrie in a lot, maybe alternate starts with him, Barton, and Smith, and use the odd one out as a super-sub

It tells you he was intent on replacing them with players of better quality. As good as Smith, Nolan, and Barton have done this season, its not like theyre irreplaceable

Jonas had looked good before the injury, in the Palace game he had 2 assists

DON'T POST ASKING FOR STREAMS. TAR MUCHLY.

For me, if we had any decent scouts at all over the last few years they should have been looking at scandinavia and eastern europe for the likes of Hangeland, Marcus Berg etc. Nordic players in particular rarely cause trouble or have difficulty adjusting and the better players are usually at least reliable if unspectacular. Well the Vikings DID already conquer England, so its not like the players arent used to dominating

Lovenkrands and Guildenstern is NOT dead!