Douggy B

Welcome to the list.

I think there are a lot of people on here that watch too much star trek.

A criminal type is a criminal type IYAM. Missed this Is it just a shitty wind-up? Or have you, personally, never been drunk and disorderly in your life? No. You're one crazy guy Danny. Just able to go out for a drink and enjoy myself rather than be a moron and cause trouble thats all.

Is the odd innocent chief being incovenienced worth all the old unsolved cases they have managed to turn over with this technology? I would say so.

A criminal type is a criminal type IYAM. Missed this Is it just a shitty wind-up? Or have you, personally, never been drunk and disorderly in your life? No.

It doesn't take long for the bleeding heart lefties to run out of ideas at start picking on things that really don't matter. Anyway, bothered, I'm a numbers man.

Why did they take his DNA to compare it to the ciggie? They must have already had it. So he will have had previous then? Which would tell me that he was worthy of being pulled in and ruled out. Dumbass naivetee kicks in. So everyone on the database has previous? I have never done anything wrong there for I am on no database. I believe if you are required to provide it but you are innocent the sample is destroyed. And you have the gall to pull others up for their spelling. Almost as bad as 'present company accepted'. Grow up Alex. There's a serious debate going on here. Anyway I was distracted as I was posting, hence why things went a bit pear shaped.

A criminal type is a criminal type IYAM.

Why did they take his DNA to compare it to the ciggie? They must have already had it. So he will have had previous then? Which would tell me that he was worthy of being pulled in and ruled out. Dumbass naivetee kicks in. So everyone on the database has previous? I have never done anything wrong therefore I am on no database. I believe if you are required to provide it but you are innocent the sample is destroyed.

Why did they take his DNA to compare it to the ciggie? They must have already had it. So he will have had previous then? Which would tell me that he was worthy of being pulled in and ruled out.

Why did they take his DNA to compare it to the ciggie?

Nowt to hide, Nowt to worry about IMO.

I think we all know about Stevie. No point kidding ourselves.

Not sure that matters either to Stevie, there appears to be one defining factor.

Rather than suing the "club you love"? No point in repeating myself. No because you were wrong.

He needs to win his court case first.

Rather than suing the "club you love"?

Just for you danny iv corrected my lazy spelling errors. Just for you I'm here to help.

Because you can present a side of an argument without going into the finer detail of "he said she said". You yourself said a book could be damaging but after MA is gone that would no longer be the case.

You Choice? Similare? Blimey.

Kolo Toure is african...not from the country / race you first suggested. but I dont think thats the issue for you is it Stevo

Eh? You are arguing that my point of view isnt valid as it is based on a story that no one knows is true or not. No I'm not. But I think that the figure quoted will turn out to be an exaggeration and a lot of your argument about the damage to the club and so on rests on that. You've also changed your tune I note, saying he should bring out a book when Ashley has left when you were originally saying he should have already gone public. OK let me break this down for you. My stance is: He should press release the facts now (well he should have done at the time) and not embellish. He should have then released a book after MA had gone. You MIGHT be in a relegation battle come January and need the funds KK is looking to sue the club for. None of the above is unreasonable IMO.

Eh? You are arguing that my point of view isnt valid as it is based on a story that no one knows is true or not.

It would be completely mental to go into a case like that having given away everything you intend to say and do. Keegan's not a moron and I would hope he has better legal advice than that too. The only sane option for Keegan is to say nothing until it's dealt with, only a complete f*ckwit wouldn't be able to see that. Hard work, as I said, if he loved the club he wouldnt be taking this to court full stop. What would he do then? Wait for the new owners and release a book, club undamaged, KK gets his pound of flesh. Apart from the damage a book could cause, he's supposed to wait an indeterminate length of time regardless of whether he's been treated unjustly? Have a word man. What damage would it cause? MA will be gone by next season. 9m is alot of cash to take out of the club and could leave you less to spend on the battle to stay up. Any evidence the £9m's not a made up figure? Already countered the stuff about the book a couple of times btw. You feel free to keep repeating yourself though. You did but you were wrong. Obviously this whole thread is subject to the original story being correct. Yes and you've based your argument on it being correct. Which is where it probably falls down. So this thread might as well be deleted then.

It would be completely mental to go into a case like that having given away everything you intend to say and do. Keegan's not a moron and I would hope he has better legal advice than that too. The only sane option for Keegan is to say nothing until it's dealt with, only a complete f*ckwit wouldn't be able to see that. Hard work, as I said, if he loved the club he wouldnt be taking this to court full stop. What would he do then? Wait for the new owners and release a book, club undamaged, KK gets his pound of flesh. Apart from the damage a book could cause, he's supposed to wait an indeterminate length of time regardless of whether he's been treated unjustly? Have a word man. What damage would it cause? MA will be gone by next season. 9m is alot of cash to take out of the club and could leave you less to spend on the battle to stay up. Any evidence the £9m's not a made up figure? Already countered the stuff about the book a couple of times btw. You feel free to keep repeating yourself though. You did but you were wrong. Obviously this whole thread is subject to the original story being correct.