Jump to content

triggy99

Members
  • Posts

    930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by triggy99

  1. ... First off Given Zogz and Martins rubbish? Second we've been linked with Guthrie more than anyone so I think our thoughts are a little lower than Arshavin. Bit of a dreamer aren't you lad? Don't feed the WUM. what your irish? go support a team in your own country Must try harder. must try harder? im not trying to wind you up. it just annoys me when people like you make comments about newcastle when you shouldnt even support them
  2. no my point is get rid of the 5-6 players i mentioned any replace them with 3 or so players that can actually play football using the money gained from the sales
  3. ... First off Given Zogz and Martins rubbish? Second we've been linked with Guthrie more than anyone so I think our thoughts are a little lower than Arshavin. Bit of a dreamer aren't you lad? Don't feed the WUM. what your irish? go support a team in your own country
  4. ... First off Given Zogz and Martins rubbish? Second we've been linked with Guthrie more than anyone so I think our thoughts are a little lower than Arshavin. Bit of a dreamer aren't you lad? givens an average keeper, zog and martins are just shit
  5. because ashleys a tightarse that isnt going to spend any money Aye he seemed really tight when he paid off the club debt. and im so happy with the clubs having no debts but buying no players
  6. because ashleys a tightarse that isnt going to spend any money
  7. :icon_lol: Lets sign Ronaldo from under noses of Real Madrid while we are at it !!!! yes because the players i mentioned are clearly of the same quality as ronaldo
  8. After watching the euros and the players we have been linked with imo we should just get rid of the rubbish like given, duff, smith, zog, barton, milner and martins and go and splash the cash on players like arshavin, turan, palychenko, engelaar. IMO we need big changes if we want to get back in the top 6 and the players we have at the minute simply arent good enough. Id rather go into next season with a small squad full of quality new players than the current squad of arseholes plus a few additional signings.
  9. ball never went out but it was never a another booking. should have reallly played advantage but still good of him to change his mind about the sending off. i have a feeling he will get criticised for it if holland fail to go through though
  10. ollic or whatever hes called for croatia impressed me
  11. You realise this post says absolutely nothing? For someone to cast aspersions so readily about my character without knowing me is in itself insecure and petulant, so I'd suggest you stopped taking that tack... I'm sorry if you didn't understand the point of my post, I'll try once more to simplify it. Ronaldo is the best player in Europe, the EPL will be weaker without him. There.. surely even you can understand that? I took away all those "big words". Also, the words I use are the best words to use for the situation, I don't use them to show off, foolish boy. Out of curiosity, which were the words you thought were there for decoration? Where do you get the idea I'm narrow minded? Is it the way I speak to you? I'd suggest that rather than a insecurity, it's a reaction to the butchery of the English language I'm witnessing, it's a reaction to your childish support of a successful side ahead of your local team. Now I am giddy as I wait for your high brow, world weary reply. 1. Yet you cannot clearly use a hyphen or capitalize properly! Do you see the irony? 2. More narrow-mindedness (notice the hyphen) . I caught you out and you know it, and as for lauguages ... don`t even go there! My point was that the Prem didn`t need the 'best footballer in the world' it has never really had it before The collective is more important. Taking a few out, while more pour in will not weaken it at all. fat american
  12. if ur talkin to me what i said about him isnt really my final opinion of him because i havnt seen enough of him to decide if i think hes a good player or not. im not saying hes bad im just saying i wouldnt want to spend too much on him because ive only ever seen him play for holland in the euros. he might be an amazing player and if so i wouldnt mind spending more on him.
  13. clearly is and if you wernt so clueless you might realise it Would you care to describe your definition of shit then? Or would you just like to resort to petty names instead of an actual debate. really slow, only classed as great/world class when abrahmovic took over at chelsea and spent all the money, other players in the team carry him and terry and they try to take all the glory/credit for it when they are shit. Also every goal lampard scores is a lucky deflected goal, (champions league final goal is a great example of one of his goals). Its also a joke how he gets booed for england because hes shit but when chelsea came to st james he got clapped on just because his mam died. If im honest i couldnt care less if his mam died and there is no need for him to make such a big deal over it as plenty of peoples parents die everyday. My main point is lampard is shit and the other chelsea players carry him. Essien and ballack are both better players than lampard and same goes with carvalho for terry I agree wholeheartedly. also put lampard in a rubbish team and he will be proven to be shit
  14. You realise this post says absolutely nothing? For someone to cast aspersions so readily about my character without knowing me is in itself insecure and petulant, so I'd suggest you stopped taking that tack... I'm sorry if you didn't understand the point of my post, I'll try once more to simplify it. Ronaldo is the best player in Europe, the EPL will be weaker without him. There.. surely even you can understand that? I took away all those "big words". Also, the words I use are the best words to use for the situation, I don't use them to show off, foolish boy. Out of curiosity, which were the words you thought were there for decoration? Where do you get the idea I'm narrow minded? Is it the way I speak to you? I'd suggest that rather than a insecurity, it's a reaction to the butchery of the English language I'm witnessing, it's a reaction to your childish support of a successful side ahead of your local team. Now I am giddy as I wait for your high brow, world weary reply. where is torres actually from?
  15. depends on his price for me. no way id want to be paying anymore than 5mil at the very most as ive never really heard of him before the euros and he might only look this good as he is playing in an amazing team
  16. clearly is and if you wernt so clueless you might realise it Would you care to describe your definition of shit then? Or would you just like to resort to petty names instead of an actual debate. really slow, only classed as great/world class when abrahmovic took over at chelsea and spent all the money, other players in the team carry him and terry and they try to take all the glory/credit for it when they are shit. Also every goal lampard scores is a lucky deflected goal, (champions league final goal is a great example of one of his goals). Its also a joke how he gets booed for england because hes shit but when chelsea came to st james he got clapped on just because his mam died. If im honest i couldnt care less if his mam died and there is no need for him to make such a big deal over it as plenty of peoples parents die everyday. My main point is lampard is shit and the other chelsea players carry him. Essien and ballack are both better players than lampard and same goes with carvalho for terry
  17. clearly is and if you wernt so clueless you might realise it
  18. stop saying lampards a great player. its simply not true Sorry but if Jose Mourinho and the like rate him so highly, there must be something to it. He might be utter gash for England, but you have to admit Chelsea are a better side when he's pulling the strings and there are few players in the Premiership who have the same timing as him. hes shit and there were much better examples you could have used than lampard and terry.
  19. stop saying lampards a great player. its simply not true
  20. lampard and terry? the premiership would be a better place without them
  21. its ded good. i watch it when i go to america
  22. Newcastle chiefs risked losing one of their most prized assets
  23. Probably better to photoshop out the penalty blower & comedy keeper from that one. and shit lampard
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.