Howay

It would be hilarious if it wasn't frightening. The saddest part is that Cruz is an utter fucking nutjob as well so the chances of an 'acceptable' Republican being nominated are pretty slim.

I still think (really fucking hope) that if he does win the Republican nomination that the swing voters will be scared off by him and vote democrat. I do worry though as there are plenty of people about that say things along the lines of "yeah I mean he's crazy but I do like that he's not a typical politician and speaks his mind etc". The scary thing is if you actually listen to his speeches he says very little, it's normally just fluff like "If I got in power I would have the best financial people, believe me I know people that you've not even heard of that are so much better than what we have there now" and "If I'm in charge we will win at trade, we will beat China, Japan and Mexico at trade" errm okay... the only things he seems to actually say he will do is build a wall and get rid of Obamacare. I just can't understand these lunatics that live in trailer parks that would happily vote for a bloke like Trump, do they actually believe he has their best interest at heart or is it just because he wants to build a wall to keep Mexicans out?

I fucking hate Stoke, vile club with vile fans. That aside Hughes is doing a canny job with them and they will probably howk us, 3-0 to Stoke.

was there an original to 'ignition' or was there only ever a remix?

I hope that Short knew absolutely nothing about this so that he becomes even more disillusioned with the hovel of a club he got convinced into buying.

Aye it makes the move to sack him look odd as it's nothing they haven't known for months so why do it now? Of course he fully deserved the sack but as I say it should have happened months ago if they saw what he did as grounds for termination of his contract.

Totally agree with it being daft playing Rooney all the time in friendlies, Hodgson never bothers trying different combinations up top which looks increasingly daft as he now has a decent crop of goal scorers but no idea how/if any of them fit together. I've no doubt whatsoever we will see Hodgson's favorite players shoe horned into a team and it'll be shite, probably not even get out of the group tbh.

I don't even see the point in showing it in court, they can't really prove it was his in the photo anyway. The only possible reason for showing it could be to try and put that image () in the jury's minds when this defence attacking her comment about his pubic hair comes up.

The attack can't start without the ball though, a poor defence tends to mean you're on the defensive for a lot of the game as they are poor at winning the ball and distributing the ball if they do win it which means rather than initiating our own attacks they give the opposition the ball back again to launch another attack. Think you're getting mixed up with attack is the best form of defence tbh, which while true is again predicated on having a defence capable of winning and the distributing the ball. To outscore the goals we leak we'd have to be one of the best attacks in the league.

Aye we would be in better shape if we had spent £13m on another defender (or two) instead of buying Thauvin. I know we didn't know he wasn't going to work out but the fact he really didn't get a place in the side anyway shows he wasn't really needed.

Aye typical lost an argument behavior, that mackem that was on here yesterday did the same thing just acting like we were all just comparing Johnson to Huntley and ignored the points that were being made. They and their club have stuck up for a nonce, classy club indeed.

That's more like it imo. Not that we will see it mind.

Aye, Rooney especially. Hodgson has even had him basically playing CM to ensure he's on the pitch. We should be going with Vardy and Kane up top tbh as those two have been the best two English strikers and I think they'd make a good partnership with Vardy's pace coming off Kanes knock on/hold up ability, all irrelevant mind as like you say it'll be Rooney.

Shearer's 11 btw. No natural winger when we have a kid like Sterling, I like Carrick but he shouldn't be starting for England nowadays like and I don't see why he put Cahill in there other than he has been an England regular in recent years because he has been poor this season.

Disgusting really, I thought it was desperate/delusional to be protecting the club before but at least they had (albeit shaky) grounds but now that rug has been whipped from under them and they have no excuse to be arguing on the side of their club. Guess they're all just perfectly comfortable that their club is happy to play a nonce. I just popped on there to see what they were saying... fucking hell. A lot of them going with a "well it must be true if HE said it" sarcastic tone about the bloke tweeting the court proceedings, despite everything I've seen him say go on to be proven.

I suppose the imbecile was right mind, we were completely incorrect likening SAFC to ITV. The fair comparison would be to another company that covered up a bunch of nonces, like the BBC.

So they were basically trying to figure out a way they could keep this animal playing while restricting his access to kids? Honestly man it just keeps getting worse, imagine if they were a relevant club?

The worst part of this is that basically every fan knew we needed defenders, even the thickest of charvas was banging on about how we needed defenders in January. We were one of the worst defences in the league as well as being dangerously thin so there really wasn't reason to avoid buying. So what will the starting pairing be? Lascelles and Taylor? fucking horror show that.

Fucking despicable club.

Aye, that discussion also came at a very convenient time for him. If that discussion did happen I'd hazard to guess that he was the one that brought it up, "Well all I'm saying is 13 is good to go in Japan, so why isn't 15 okay here... am I right Catts?" dirty bastard and we can now all say dirty fucking club.

What utter nonsense trail of logic will the mackems use now? There goes the (already on dodgy ground) they wanted to protect his innocent until proven guilty right defence they've been using up until now.

Lost the argument so is resorting to pure fabrication

Btw the Ian Huntley and Harold Shipman examples are used because they are extreme, it's to make it easier for you to wrap your head around what we are all saying. I had a P.E teacher at school who was accused and then charged of grooming and sexual activity with a 15 year old student, he plead not guilty, the girl had left the school at 16 by the time the teacher was charged. The school took the action to suspend him with pay while he awaited trial, he went on to be found guilty of his crimes. So you would have been fine with the bloke just going back and teaching while the charge was hanging over his head? Because that is what you are saying about Johnson, or is a situation where a bloke was being charged with very similar (almost identical) crimes still going to be written off by you? Oh aye here is a news article about the bloke: http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/teacher-jailed-kissing-pupil-cupboard-1417784

:lol: