Jump to content

Howay

Members
  • Posts

    16918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by Howay

  1. It's fucking hilarious that some of them think this way, it's no bother to me at all that we are in the Championship. In fact, struggling to watch the games aside, I'm enjoying it as we're winning every week (often twice a week ffs), meanwhile they're getting pumped off the 2nd bottom side. They'll be here come May anyway so I've no idea what them running round saying "well we're in the Prem RIGHT NOW" is supposed to do, they're basically there in name only it's not like they're competing in the division ffs.
  2. Everyone wins until they play Rafa's Bukkake lovers Rayvin, these Tractor fucking, winnet sniffing tossers will be no exception.
  3. Obama's half brother is another complete and utter maniac ffs, Trump also seems to always forget he's not even running against Obama ffs. I cannot see how him bringing along a fucking lunatic from Africa that is muslim who just happens to be the half brother of the president and treating it as a source of pride is going to help him get any votes, the African muslim bit might lose him some from his normal support (in all honesty they'll just hypocrite their way out of why that particular muslim doesn't bother them mind). I'm sure there are plenty of blokes that scream all day on subways voting for Hillary but she sure as fuck isn't going to be parading them about. Trump is a fucking loser like.
  4. Howay

    Fifa 17

    Aye I prefer this one to the last few.
  5. I do agree he doesn't hide, I didn't really see much of him but he scored a load for Hull so surely there's a capable player in there somewhere? I'm just not sure I see the point when Mitro, Atsu, Perez, etc have all looked more capable when they have played, surely it's better to hoy one of them in there rather than start him most games. I know you're not agreeing with the selection btw it's just the one selection that really baffles me, while I don't agree with him selecting Anita over Yedlin I get the argument that Anita is more defensive but I genuinely don't see what Diame brings to the team at all, it's not like he really breaks the opposition play up or contributes to attacks.
  6. The way Diame is playing the only reason could surely be he doesn't like Mitro. Diame nullifies the argument that Rafa doesn't want to play 2 up top for me as the bloke remains so far forward he may as well be a striker anyway, Mitro tracks back more than him imo.
  7. Class and the only way we can lose the spot is if Huddersfield win by 11 goals or something tomorrow
  8. Norwich 2 up now, we need to pull our fucking fingers out man. We need to stop faffing with Diame he just seems to break down any moves that come towards him, we need someone in there that has shown some performances.
  9. Diame contributes fucking nothing man, so far he has just miscontrolled the ball about 4 times.
  10. I agree with both of you about his reasoning, my only problem with it is that Anita isn't exactly a solid defender either. I suppose he is a 'defend first' type but I still personally don't really like him there over Yedlin.
  11. I'm not either but then Yedlin come in due to Anita being a muppet and getting banned and performed a lot better than Anita, I'd have went with him going forward after that.
  12. Clear as day what his preferred 11 is now tbh. The only ones I really take issue with is Diame and perhaps Anita (he has done okay there but Yedlin has been far better imo). It's also a bit odd that Lazaar really hasn't had much of a chance yet despite Dummett doing fuck all to stake his claim to a starting spot, I get that away from home perhaps isn't the best time to hoy him in but there have been plenty of games to give him a chance in the past.
  13. I could be wrong aye, by and large though most of them will have calmed down about it by then and probably will have accepted it. Aye you're never running Rayvin .
  14. Maybe it won't be so bad, the most depressing fact is when you think after those 8 years most of these Bernie supporters will be in their 30's and will be jaded enough by then not to be pushing for anything. We'll probably all be chipped and fucking robots by then mind and any anti-establishment thoughts would have us sent to the vaporizer.
  15. Yeah, she's a standard politician tbh and that's what we'll see. I think there's so much venom to this election that she's likely to be a one-term president, despite that it'll be 8 years before any change on that front as we've seen what an anti-establishment bloke on the right looks like and it's not pretty and since she would be the standing president she would be the Dem candidate so the right will be the only source of that anti-establishment one.
  16. Fair enough but when has that really ever happened? Bloomberg being Mayor of NYC is probably the most recent, as I said in the post before though I don't see a massive amount of difference between a politician who is paid up by a special interest group and a bloke who could really help make up one of those special interest groups running, the latter is really just cutting out the middle man of the former. Of course, a Bill Gates type who is above it all wealth wise and is perhaps not worrying about his business at all anymore who comes in without ideas of self-dealing would be great but in all honesty it's a fairy tale and they would still have to compete against a house of representatives full of the very politicians we all moan about to get owt done.
  17. I fully agree but when they don't get their way in the first election they've tried it's no good hoying their toys out of the pram (honestly I've deleted some of these numpties off facebook because of the utter shite they've spouted). I think Sanders was a great thing as it pushed Hillary left and she adopted some of his ideals, he also refused to step aside until she won him over. The US system is without doubt flawed (which system isn't really) and people should push for change but it's going to take a long time if it occurs, Sanders was never going to win and I just think what Renton said about a lot of them being bitter is true.
  18. Oh aye she's of course worth a hell of a lot compared to Sanders but as I said in my previous post the blokes a cook, you don't get politicians like him very often at all. As I say people can level the 'she's in the pockets of banks and special interest groups' etc all they like at her and I'll agree but that's just like any politician, the President makes $400k a year and yet a few years after their presidency they're worth fucking millions (Chelsea Clinton's wedding was something like $3m) but again that's not unique to the Clinton's. The real joke for me is that Trump fans think he's really above any of these special interest groups, he's even been on record multiple times now clearly dodging questions about putting his business dealings into a blind trust, I personally don't see a massive amount of difference between someone being paid by a special interest group and someone making decisions based on what's best for their large multinational business, it's both essentially self dealing.
  19. Aye, as I say that's Carlin's take and it's probably right that a lot of this stuff is really just in gray areas rather than being any sort of major issue or scandal. Is there not evidence that Powell etc used private servers? Iirc after that the argument shifted to well how many emails did she give over and how many devices did she have etc. The oddest bunch for me are the Sanders supporters that are now backing Trump, I get that they are anti-establishment but fucking hell man Trump stands directly against the vast majority of the things Sanders was wanting to bring in . So as you say I think that bunch are just being petulant, whether there was a 'fix' against him or not is worthy of investigating to a degree but I don't think Hillary had a big hand in it anyway and the fact is he was never going to get the nomination as in all honesty he's a fucking loon, while I like a lot of the ideals he was preaching he was in cloud cuckoo land if he thought he was going to bring in Universal healthcare, free state college, a 'living' minimum wage, etc all in a 4 year term, look what Obama had to do just to fucking force through his healthcare bill and even then it was fucked with to such a degree it ended up barely resembling what he wanted.
  20. I think that is something she really isn't playing up enough, she's been wealthy for a long time now obviously but as you say she's not from an 'elite' background. She mentioned her background at a debate recently iirc but that's maybe the first time I've heard it, her father was a curtain fitter or something and she worked hard and went to an Ivy league school, became a lawyer and she really did do a lot of stuff for families and children in that area. Somehow Trump has made it seem like he's this successful everyman who came from little and now he's what he is today when really that is more fitting of her background.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.