Isegrim

This statistic is based on the interrogation of 10,000 goats and sheep.

But petrol is more explosive than parfume.

... I walked down to my economics test with some of the lads, and at one point of them suddenly announced "FUCK ME WITH A FISH FORK!!!" At which point I think my laughter could be perhaps referred to as "raucous". I maybe even guffawed. Anyways, OH MY GOD I LAUGHED. I then introduced him to "fuck me a lampshade" and, thanks to Isegrim yesterday, "fuck me with a lamp post". It then struck me that I didn't know what it was he was expostulating about in the first place, so about 5 mins on from the original outburst, I had to be like "umm.... why did you yell that??" Apparently it's because there was a HUGE puddle in the road. Hmm.... story started off well... tailed off in the middle.... ending was poor. Needs more dragons. 54112[/snapback] It had me in the middle and that made the story GREAT © SLP 2005.

Maybe it's intifada and your lass just wants a bottle of petrol?!

Looks like Fumaca tbh

What??? Did Australia not qualify automatically?

So many attempts and still unable to score with no goalie in goal... http://www.chilloutzone.de/files/05110803.html

Looks nowt like Blaydon tbh. 53978[/snapback] Sure, it's an Adidas jacket.

So there we have Alex, Gemmill and Manc-Mac. But there is neither a fat ginger nor a bald chimp.

I agree that Robert is obviously a selfish character. But I never found those interviews he made during his Newcastle career as bad as they have been made out (mostly by the tabloids). This interview here is very stupid but a "scathing attack" looks different to me. It's definitely not in the Roy Keane league of bollocking your team mates. I think Sir Bobby was doing absolutely the right thing by ignoring Robert most of the time and just concentrate on his football talking.

If only for how hard security'll have to work to keep me away.... *sigh* 53899[/snapback] I think you need help tbh. I would imagine he is repulsive to 99% of women! 53924[/snapback] Yes, but this Lou isn't a woman, it is a lunatic.

I think it was more Jekyll&Hyde performances we saw then. But I admit you do have a point. Anyway, flicking through .com's waffles I stumbled along this piece of fortune telling (from the match against Leeds) ... So three years on, does anyone really believe he is becoming a 20 goals striker suddenly?

Nope. Comedy and penalty genius.

Hooray, I didn't see it either. For once, I don't feel left out.

Or sticking sand in your head, like a famous Jorman footballer once said.

Well, it's more entertaining than the matches though. Do you want any instructions for paper planes... And to criticize Keegan for the odd game that was lost under his reign is the most hilarous thing I have read in ages.

I hate this phrase. It's absolute nonsense. Of course nobody would be happier. But it is about the standards of a squad you have at your disposal and what you make out of it. If you have good players and play "pretty" football good results are inevitable, especially against inferior teams. Good football is not excluding good results. I think a midfield of Solano, Parker and Emre with Michael Owen up front shouldn't be happy with struggling against very poor opposition. The aim has to be higher. 53438[/snapback] Whether you like the phrase or not, it's still valid.... Often we played 'pretty football' under Keegan and ended up losing by the odd goal so no, good results do not always follow.... 53445[/snapback] Though, in the end it nearly brought Newcastle the title. IMHO by the way to play games to win them instead of just trying not to lose contributed to the fact that Newcastle were a top team at that time. So. I don't think this phrase is valid at all. Because obviously nobody would be happy to get slaughtered constantly. But why are some people not able to distinguish between being happy about winning and being disappointed about the performance? Just grinding out results might be good enough for a poor team, but for me it's not enough for a good team (against poor teams). Of course Everton were successful last year with this tactics, but look where they are now. In the end normally quality will succeed, so I don't think it would be to bad too demonstrate this quality occasionally. Because if Newcastle keep on playing like how they have played mostly in recent weeks I can't see the club finishing in the top 6. With this kind of performances the team will stand no chance when we play the better teams.

I hate this phrase. It's absolute nonsense. Of course nobody would be happier. But it is about the standards of a squad you have at your disposal and what you make out of it. If you have good players and play "pretty" football good results are inevitable, especially against inferior teams. Good football is not excluding good results. I think a midfield of Solano, Parker and Emre with Michael Owen up front shouldn't be happy with struggling against very poor opposition. The aim has to be higher.

Bollocks. I don't hate Souness, to the contrary I actually do like him. I just don't rate him as a manager. I'll have no problem with him when he was starting to be succesful. But for me that doesn't mean just winning games, but to restore confidence I'd like Newcastle to look superior to teams that are fighting against relegation. It also means that they have to get good results against the better teams on a constant basis. I'm happy about every game we are winning and that takes us up in the table, even if it means that those results will keep an average manager in charge of a good team. Because I share Alex's feelings that we have a better squad than last season. But I also want those players to show it.

Fuck me with a lamp pole and I was pretty sure I had seen the mackems score twice... 53196[/snapback] Lamp pole. 53201[/snapback] It was the largest pole I could think of for this kind of nonsense. Anyway, I'd like to get the kind of optimism other do have. Of course results are great at the moment. But for me just winning against the likes of WBA isn't good enough (I haven't seen that game). It's the same as last year when we beat Israeli pub tems etc. But with a nearly full squad struggling against Birmingham and being played off the pitch by Sunderland in the 2nd half is worrying even if in the end the games were won.

Fuck me with a lamp pole and I was pretty sure I had seen the mackems score twice...

17 points from the last 8 games against mostly poor teams. How many will be added until the end of the year? Chelsea (a) Everton (a) Villa (h) Arsenal (h) West Ham (a) Liverpool (a) Charlton (h) Spurs (a)

Would you trust this woman?

Yep, today I declared myself officially insane not to cancel the subscription.