Zathras

Whoever beats England. Unless it's Italy or Argentina. Diving bastards.

Headed in at the top of the box tbh. I think it's the ball it really does seem to knuckle more than any I've seen before. 148753[/snapback] 148760[/snapback] Baseball term for a ball that moves unexpectedly in the air I believe. (As thrown by a 'knuckleball pitcher'). 148770[/snapback] A ball 'knuckles' when there is very little spin on it; it moves very unexpectedly and randomly through the air as it flies.

A Laundry Room, thats posh. Sneezing and filling ya pants however, not so posh, your face must have been a picture. 148410[/snapback] I wonder if he has a larder as well? 148609[/snapback] What the fuck is a larder? The laundry room is a room twelve floors below me where I share 10 washing machines with 205 other apartments...

Headed in at the top of the box tbh. I think it's the ball it really does seem to knuckle more than any I've seen before.

Good to hear--I do like to see teams at full strength in the World Cup....

Marquez would get killed in England. He'd lose his cool and get sent off four to six times per season.

What a fuckin' disgrace. Never got past a jog all match. Very disappointing lack of effort. Heads down after the first goal and never in it after that.

I put my back out once sneezing. Just a strain like, but it hurt. I didn't shit in my pants though 147826[/snapback] Never happened before, though I've had similar back pain issues. I think maybe it was because it was the fourth or fifth consecutive back-wrenching sneez that finally did it.

Nah, I'd been home for about ten minutes. And yeah, I got right into the shower and then to the laundry room.

God I fuckin' hate Frings.

Weren't Brazil no.1 at the last World Cup despite struggling to qualify (by their standards at least) and France being the reigning World and European Champions? 147054[/snapback] Yeah, France did very well at that cup too The ranking are full of shite, and everyone knows that. At least they say they're 'fixing them.' OTOH, every win that the US gets against Jamaica, Mexico, Costa Rica, etc. counts only for 75% of the number of points that England gets for beating the Faroe Islands or Andorra. There's at least an attempt to make things even, but without any worthwhile universal measuring stick, world wide ranking are fairly impossible. If you look into the ELO ratings, they are a bit more realistic, but again, worldwide ranking is fairly impossible. http://www.eloratings.net/ Brazil Netherlands France England Czech Republic Spain Italy Argentina Germany Portugal Denmark Sweden Uruguay Romania USA Iran Mexico Croatia Ireland Australia

No joke! These fucking allergies are murder!

B/c with the money he became a bad person.

That was me btw.

Not worth the effort of clicking on the link tbh.

Did that yesterday

Sounds amusing enough for headphones at work.

Not gray; it's blue, I assure you. I own one. Here's another winner from '96:

What are you talkin' about?? BEST KIT EVER!! (Though the gold stitching would have made it even better) How it didn't make the Football365 list of worst World Cup shirts I'll never know. I think they left it off in favor of the Mexico '98 one which I actually kind of like:

No I think Touchy is closer. 146017[/snapback] It's touchy to point out that you're behind the times? It would be much more apt to make fun of the fact that Nike is marketing the away kit as "retro" as it's a throwback to their first USA shirt which is as old as... 1996

This is news? It was pointed out when Nike debuted all of the shirts for the cup. And it's actually a throwback to the 1950 shirt which we wore when we beat England 1-0 in Belo Horizonte.

Good comeback.

Probally blame souness tbh. 144330[/snapback] Shepherd, tbqfaphtvm

Whereas you neatly sidestep it by pointing this out. Have you ever considered reading an entire thread before posting LM? 144334[/snapback] Have you ever considered thinking I just don't agree...and I haven't sidestepped anything, what I think is quite plainly stated in this thread. The military are trained to obey orders, and the buck stops with the people who give the orders, however Bush Snr, or whoever decided to allow Saddam to escape the first time was a stupid arsehole. It is easy to understand the panic of a life or death situation, but the one time they should have been trigger happy, they weren't. I have met some Americans in my time, so if now and again you make a dumb comment like you have just done, I know they aren't all like that. 144340[/snapback] You missed the point.... again. I pointed out that you made a comment about the answers that would be forthcoming from Lazarus' post, despite there being 2-3 below that post and above yours in anticipation of those anwers. And you still didn't answer the question in Lazarus' post, only made a comment about others sidestepping it, which to me means that you sidestepped it.

Whereas you neatly sidestep it by pointing this out. Have you ever considered reading an entire thread before posting LM?