The Fish

Targett cannot possibly be on £100k a week.

Same here.

That doesn't sound like our fans (or any fanbase on twitter).

Ah that's shit man. Hopefully you'll find something quickly.

Get more people buying tickets to win mega-ultra-uber-jackpot than you would if it was "just" £1m. In the UK I think there's a chance to £1m with every ticket you buy for the Euros, not sure if its the same for the UK Lotto.

He has been The Model of professionalism.

If they haven't they should open up their Computer, love.

We have been shopping around for an official Tractor partner...

Collecting them all together will mean lower fees/charges, and will mean you've a larger pot. Plus it cuts down on admin/literature nonsense.

That's just the echo.

Is that code for having a shit?

At the moment English is the language you're reaching for, like a toddler. My syntax is conversational and fine for this place. Your spelling and syntax is leading to people question if you know the language at all. For example, lynquestic quadry? Linguistic quandary is what I assume you were reaching for, but even then that wouldn't make sense. You don't "cast" a quandary (a state of uncertainty), linguistic or otherwise. You cast aspersions, or you are in a quandary over language. But you don't cast a linguistic quandary, and certainly not a lynquestic quadry. Nike or Adidas want to be associated with progress, with success, with attractive brands. Us not signing someone of the calibre of David Beckham isn't going to change that. Of course there are shady deals in football, look at us signing Boumsong for an example. But again, I'm not sure what the fuck this has got to do with the here and now?

Adidas aren't going to pull funding because we don't, in the FIRST YEAR OF THE CONTRACT, sign a global superstar. They're hitching their wagon to ours because, with the backing of the Saudis, it's likely that we will become a Champions League regular, and regularly competing for domestic honours too. Those players you mentioned have individual deals with Adidas, so I'm not sure why you brought them up? Ok, I'm going to ask you something, and I don't mean any offence, but is English your first language? I ask because I'm wary of going in on you in case much of this is just a case of misunderstanding?

We might not buy someone, but we'll get bodies in.

Stop penetrating my echo chamber!

Yeah it's a screengrab of the table exactly The fix can be attempted any number of times. So, it could fail once, then work on the second, or fail 6 times and succeed on the 7th. I want only the fixes that fail and are at no point successful.

No it won't and no it absolutely won't. A disaster? Have you heard yourself man?! We were relegation fodder 2 1/2yrs ago. It took Man City 3 yrs to get into the CL and they had unlimited spending on top of a 7yrs of top flight midtable football, where they'd spent €105m. We have less freedom to spend, a lower rung to climb from and a more congested top table than ever. If Kimmich is going to a PL club he's of the ability to play for the established elite. We need to be buying players who could, but who aren't yet fancied. Players like Bruno, Botman, Isak, Livramento, etc.

New one every month

Delivered as an excel, by 3rd party, hosted on a sharepoint. They lift raw data from their server.

Yeah, that just returns the unique job that have a failure, unfortunately. Jobs can fail and succeed on the same day, which is causing the issue. I need jobs that fail, and only fail.

Fuck it @Gemmill it's better with pictures so I'll stick it here. I need to return purely those fixes that have failed status and no success status. Pivot table returns this; so I want to return only the lwfra1oraavp01 and those like it. The column to the right of the pivot contains the following; =IF(AND(NOT(ISBLANK(K5)),(ISBLANK(L5))),J5,"Success"), which is fine, but I want to return an array with solely the jobs that are not success. I'd prefer to pull from the raw data rather than the pivot.