The Fish

Renton would be on the right wing. Way way way out there on the right. Fist would want to be in the hole, despite being ineffectual anywhere near the box. He'd want to feed off Cath's impressive presence up front. And of course Meenzer would be rock solid at the back.

Sounds good. Don't suppose you could let us know the show, and when it was aired so we can have a look/pass it off as our own insight, could you?

I should judge you because of your association to CT, J69 or Gemmill?

The fuck did I do?!

Jesus wept man, charge your phone!

Christ.

Nah, most of it is because I'm one of the most active on here, so an easy target to snipe at from the cover of anonymity. Same as CT to be fair. But that's the internet for ya

You're just a distraction from spreadsheets and SQL. Put it this way, the amount of shit I get on a daily basis and I've never once flounced, either I'm a masochist or this place is just an amusement.

I am, as always, entirely unphased by the bile that dribbles my way on here.

is Trophyshy acting the cunt because his joke fell flat in the other thread?

Are you ok hun? Inbox me, yeah?

Nah, she'll not stick around once he's been passed around by Rapey Bob and Purple Aki a few times

I'm not really comfortable comparing betrayed partner with a fiddled kid.

He claims they knew May 3rd http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/24/adam-johnson-quizzed-in-court-over-googling-age-of-consent

South Americans

I'd not be surprised to see her shacking up with a new Premier League footballer before too long, either that or one of the Z list arseholes she shares the Big Brother house with... Likely after her "story" is serialised in Grazia or on the Mail Online. Because Thatcher got her wish in the end.

No longer will it be said that Stacey Flounders with Adam's Johnson.

Or donkeys for ditches in this case.

That was a mug's game.

You don't like Krug? You're no friend of mine.

Hah! No, Chateaubriand isn't an English trend, and sparkling wine is most definitely not sparkling wine. By the way I don't think he's 1 of 4 decision makers. On the board there is Carr (the man who pushed for his appointment), Charnley (the man who appointed him) and Bob Concur.

The point being while Newcastle United can attract top managers, Mike Ashley (via Charnley) won't secure them. Either because they won't approach them, or because they refuse to offer the assurances that a top manager would need. We shouldn't meekly accept McClaren as the best we can get, but unless there's a change at board level demanding a new manager is as likely to result in another McClaren as it is a Carver and it's very unlikely to result in a Tuchel, a de Boer or whomever. It'd be like ordering chateaubriand at Burger King, shout and wail as much as you like, but it's not going to happen*. *unless there's a seismic shift at the top.

Can't imagine they'd be docked points or anything, but they be charged with bringing the game into disrepute? Maybe get a fine?

Well, no, they're not exactly the same. I was speaking generally. Owners like Short, Lerner, Ashley, could afford to employ the right people for each position at their club and cement themselves in the top half of the table. Newcastle, sunderland and Villa all have sufficient credentials to be attractive to good players, good coaches, and capable backroom staff if sold properly. Instead they're mismanaged from top to bottom. As an aside, I don't think Ashley gives a fuck what the fans think, positive or negative. I don't think he's made decisions to spite fans, he's just made decisions to further his brand. Genuinely, we could have enticed Tuchel, Garde, de Boer, etc. if we'd a) sold it properly and ensured (contractually) them the kind of spending/control in the transfer window as we've seen McClaren enjoy.