The Fish

Dougle's just misdirecting his anger. First at the BBC for daring to report on the only interesting matches last night, now at me for pointing out that there's nowt wrong with the BBC only having the interesting matches on their front page. I'm not 100% but I'm guessing it's got something to do with the ol' stifficulty. A quick google tells me it affects 4/10 apparently. I'm obviously in the clear so the odds go up for the rest of you.

Well, You're a pro, I'm sure you've got it in you for one last big effort.

Gemmil is putting a lot of women in the North East off the idea entirely.

You have a strange idea of what flirting is.

I think this is part of that investigation Roman Abramovich bankrolled major Dutch club while Chelsea owner — The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (en-GB) (thebureauinvestigates.com)

Do they sing nicely?

With this, Everton, Forest, and Villa I don't know which side of this I'm falling on; Are the FFP/PSR rules finally holding reckless spending to account or, Are ambitious clubs having their growth limited?

Now, if he was doping while at Man Utd he needs to get his supplier done for false advertising

6 stories about 3/4 matches, when the 4th match was boring as fuck. Sounds fair to me like. And like Paddocklad says, it'll get the most traffic so What would you have preferred? Even if there were 4 stories, 3 of them would still have been about the 'Big 6' clubs.

Weren't we linked with Ramsey from them?

That's not where you're dribbling from.

These are 3 of the 'big 6' Premier League clubs in action. Chelsea's game was full of action and needed a 90th minute winner to settle it. Manchester United's game had talking points and was also settled in dramatic fashion. Liverpool have just won the League Cup and have a chance for a Quadruple and are playing young promising players (which always gets attention), and the 4th match was a 1-0 victory for Wolves over Brighton with little to no drama. I'd save your wrath for less explainable shit. Like just how we can be so unlucky in the draws/

He's been quite clear. It was wrong.

I'm always up for a little Chelsea, Liverpool and Man Utd abuse, but I dunno what the issue is here?

He's only some butter, chocolate and golden syrup away from saying "let them eat cake"

Given they're effectively putting a CGI mask over his real face, why not that same de-aged Robert De Niro face on some body double? It's bizarre.

Not sure a geriatric psychopath would have been great in that midfield. Personally (and in hindsight) would have gone 2 in midfield (Bruno and Miley), 3 ahead of them (Gordon Willock and Almiron) with 1 up top (Isak). Willock playing the number 10 position, but more of a support striker role?

He'd never catch up with Gloomy.

He moves like the de-aged De Niro in the Irishman.