The Fish

TGIF

The world is flat because maps written on paper are flat. Mona Lisa was Flat Stanley's grandma.

She'd probably say that Bruce Willis isn't her father, that was a film and that her actual father is still touring with Aerosmith. Then she'd ask her security to introduce you to Helter and Skelter. which are the names she's made him call his fists. This wasn't as funny written down as it is in my head.

Because they're level to the ground. I mean that's basic stuff Wolfy. I honestly think it's the scale of it that confuses you.

Tickets aren't expensive, but I don't know when the next manned mission is. Why don't you take the family to Disneyland, then take a trip to Cape Canaveral and watch one? At the very least you can talk to astronauts and tell these brave men and women they're full of shit to their face.

Well, I mean there is direct proof, so the rest of your post is nonsensical nonsense, nonsensed by a no... Just curious, what actual proof would satisfy you? I'd like something specific please

There is direct proof, so the rest of your post is bullshit, bullshitted by a bullshitter.

Assange and Harris both having good days. Big day for rapists

Did you? I don't even remember it. Where was it? Can you prove it? I think the match-by-match prediction threads work because it encourages discussion, I'm just talking about a pre-season drag & drop league predictor.

It can be proved and has been proven. But you (and the flat-earthers) dismiss that proof for reasons unknown. Do you realise how preposterous your condescension is? It's like a toddler telling a grown up that they're wrong about taxes and they shoud be paid with mudpies instead.

It's all falling apart, isn't it Wolfy? Your delusion is appearing flimsier and flimsier, so you cling to it tighter and tighter. It's ok to admit you're wrong, we all do it, nobody thinks any less of us.

Rattled

To be fair, Lawrenson falls into the trap of expecting runs to end earlier than they do. I reckon if you asked him to predict the table before the season starts, it would be significantly different to the table that manifests from his fixture by fixture predictions. Of course, he'll still give Liverpool more credit than they deserve, but I doubt he would have predicted them to win it unbeaten. @Ant Before the beginning of next season, is it possible to have a league prediction thread/page? Registered users drag the team's icon/name into league positions, hit submit and have it on their profile page and within a thread on the football board?

Spoken like a true "Work from home" gent.

Colossal. Decent way to spend some time. Some laughs, Hathaway was good. No boobs. 6/10

The ferrous liquid surrounded the spherical magnet, incontrovertibly proving liquid will surround a ball. Now if you shrank down so that the spherical magnet was the size of the planet, you would perceive the liquid to be flat, that's obvious. Why can't you think on grand scales? Do big things trouble you?

That wasn't the point of the experiment Wolfy. You're adamant that liquid is flat, it's a cornerstone of your delusion. I've proven liquid will curve around a sphere. (•_•) <) )╯Fish / \ \(•_•) ( (> Beats / \ (•_•) <) )> Wolf / \

Which is a tacit admission of your myopic view. If proof is provided, you dismiss it out of hand. This is the very antithesis of being open minded. I showed you proof of liquid liquid curving round a sphere.

Ok, you get to say "Well I've not been convinced", what you can't do is say "I decide what is proof and what isn't."

But why? Why are you the arbiter?

Hopefully it works and they can bring it in for yellows, and freekicks that lead to goals as well.

Who are you to declare what constitutes as real proof? Especially as you've still proffered zero proof of your theories.

KCG is right though. You will blindly refute anything put forward, because you're narrow minded in your delusion.