The Fish

Ferreyra?

Ahh, Marquee, He's a false demi-regista who also plays an inverted libero role. Good signing if true. Loads of rumours this morning about Riviere and De Jong heading out the door. Happy if this means we're bringing in more players, but De Jong was actually the only #10 on our books I had faith in. Based on little more than cameos and hope.

Dark Tower has been panned by fans of the books so it's not something I'm going to make a massive effort to watch.

No, he doesn't, not in a typical 4-4-2 fashion. But he has played with slight variations to the #10 role. Sometimes Perez has played right up beside Gayle or Murphy or Mitrovic. Diame tends to play a deeper lying role than that. I honestly think the problem is with the one finishing the chances, it's the lads tasked with creating the chances. We're not keeping the ball, let alone controlling it. Had we a real replacement/improvement for Shelvey and a quality #10 I think we'd be in a much better state. Doesn't help we're missing 3 of our first choice defensive unit.

I think if we had stronger options in the squad we could play a different formation from time to time. That said, we needn't change our formation often. We can tweak the system that usual formation uses. E.G. a 4-2-3-1 with Mitrovic up front would lessen the reliance on a creative #10 as the wide men would be able to cross from deeper, or higher balls from defence would be for the wide men to run onto beyond the striker, or he could bring the #10 into the play with knock downs. If we had attacking fullbacks on both flanks the wingers could sit in a narrower 3 and overload the centre of the pitch, looking for overlapping fullbacks, or through balls for Gayle etc. the defensive cover coming from two deeper lying midfielders. 4-2-3-1 can easily morph into 4-1-4-1 or 4-4-2. Perez (for the lack of an actual #10) could get closer to the other striker and look to find pockets of space in the box.

The absence of Shelvey, Lejeune and Dummett made the lack of depth in the squad apparent against Huddersfield. Rafa's "negative" tactics won us the league last season and are our best shot of staying up. Anyone crying out for a more attacking setup dramatically overestimate our players.

Chez's system made the most sense to me. 1pt for correct For 1pt for correct Against 1pt bonus if you're correct with For & Against.

No chance. If it was HF's opinion, or mine, I'd give it a read.

Totally agree, without Shelvey we've little or no creativity or control. I'd hoped that Merino was going to reveal himself to be Alonso, but he may be closer to Acuna. Not writing him off mind, but he's not looking like the string-puller we need. Praet may be in that mould, I've no idea. But a proper #10 would be a huge weight off Shelvey (or whomever's) shoulders and Perez is not that kind of player. He doesn't bring players in, he might work as a forward, but not a #10.

I'll try and keep on top of it, but I've just started a new job, so may have to do it in blocks of 2-3 fixtures. Dunno how busy I'll be yet.

Almost.

You'll become infuriated with the unsubtle dialectic.

He doesn't mention his girlfriend, that's meeeeeeewwwwaitaminute!

Aye, fuck it. He's a narrow minded, arrogant, intransigent bellend.

Attendance doesn't equal support, or anything other than attendance.

What time is love? I wanna see you sweat.

Attendance does not equal love. Conditional or otherwise.

Well into Eurovision, is forever posting Europop videos from (what looks like) the 80s (the most gay-friendly decade in music), can cook, takes really good care of his body, has a barbed tongue, is often the first to post that picture of Keane and van Nistelrooy...what more clues did you need?

Someone who stops going to the match on principle will likely still be checking scores, watching streams, reading stories and so on. Attendance does not necessarily equate with love of the club, or with being a fan, in fact it's an "all thumbs are fingers" kind of deal. Trooper loves the club unconditionally, he attends conditionally.

Answer the questions.