The Fish

Lawro's predicted another loss for us. If his predictions were right here's how the table would look: POS TEAM P W D L PTS +/- 1 Man Utd 7 7 0 0 21 +1 2 Tottenham 7 6 1 0 19 +1 3 Man City 7 5 2 0 17 -2 4 Arsenal 7 5 1 1 16 +1 5 Liverpool 7 4 3 0 15 +2 6 Bournemouth 7 4 1 2 13 +13 7 Chelsea 7 3 3 1 12 -3 8 Southampton 7 3 1 3 10 +4 9 West Ham 7 2 3 2 9 +6 10 Burnley 7 2 1 4 7 -4 11 Crystal Palace 7 2 1 4 7 +9 12 Everton 7 2 1 4 7 +4 13 Leicester 7 2 1 4 7 +4 14 West Brom 7 2 1 4 7 -4 15 Stoke 7 1 3 3 6 -2 16 Swansea 7 2 0 5 6 +2 17 Brighton 7 1 1 5 4 -3 18 Watford 7 1 1 5 3 -10 19 Huddersfield 7 0 3 4 3 -8 20 Newcastle 7 0 3 4 3 -11

You need a safe space Pepe?

That is excellent news. £6m is a snip.

Dunno if Forest would let us have him back.

Any news on Ritchie? I know he picked up a knock and withdrew from the Scotland squad.

Can only assume Parky is being deliberately contrary. He probably misses Wolfy.

He's sexually harassed people for years and that's not ok?

Did she blindside you?

I am defeated. Different rules for different universes, but in those universes the rules have to be consistent.

Aye I tend to make 4 portions of whatever and freeze the rest.

Will do. Trying to branch out a bit as I tend to get stuck in a loop of making the same shit over and over.

DM me the recipe.

In your potatoey, spuddy dreams

Aye, it was Brian Harvey though.

Not to be contrary, but I go to Youtube for film reviews and I've never heard of him. I'm guessing he'll be suggested to people based on previous searches?

...and now I'm thinking about a tv series that only lasted a season, (I think), called "John from Cincinnati". About an odd messianic figure's interactions with a surfer family.

Dunno why, but whenever I see ", man " I always read it like a stoned Californian surfer dude. "chill out, maaaan ;) " style.

If Mitrovic is scoring at international and keeping his psychopathy in check, he surely fits into the system Rafa's using better than Gayle now?

Aye, but again, you're assuming it's a future iteration of our science, of our universe. It doesn't bother me in things like Aliens, where we've more advanced technology now than they had in that film, because it's a separate universe. But in Prometheus and stuff, how if it's a prequel do they have more advanced shit than Ripley and her pals? e.g. the Star Trek films, with young Kirk, the stuff looks cleaner, sleeker, but the tech is in-keeping with that universe's timeline, isn't it? If Chris Pratt's Kirk was dicking about with shit that Stewart's Pickard didn't have yet, that'd be odd, wouldn't it? In the terrible Star Wars prequels, they made an effort to make the ships look like older, clunkier versions of the more sleek ships we saw in the originals. The targeting systems on the Millenium Falcon were the same in TFA to the ones used in the originals. It's absolutely a minor thing, but it just jars when I see something like that.

Colour me surprised.

Or tv shows he watches, films he's seen, food he's eaten, servers he uses, oxygen he breathes...

Woohoosh

Why won't you answer his SIMPLE QUESTION?