The Fish

Suck my hairy balls, Alexander.

I've thought about that a fair bit and I realised I don't give a shit.

How's that? Teenage girls big fans of remotely setting the thermostat are they?

Does he have the smart home devices to make the most of it? Like smart plugs, Nest/Hive type things?

Given did alright for us.

There any must have gadgets I can suggest my family get me? I'm being pestered. Anyone have the Echo, or the Google Home?

Well written doesn't mean loads of long words or iambic pentameter. Just decent grammar, a decent sentence structure and so on.

They'd be top 6 and challenging for Europe dontcha know?

The lament of the beaten man. Back in your box Quiffy.

Harder to get shit players performing well defensively, that's why, usually, it's the teams with the worst defence that go down, regardless of how free scoring they are. You're as bad as CT man. Oh and Coleman is no Benitez. I didn't see how it could be controversial to say that it's easier to get a defensively sound team winning games, than it is to get a defensively shocking team winning games... then I remembered you're mostly a bunch of ornery dickheads

Well, that should convince Mr Ashley to sell up.

Oh sure, I just mean I'd prefer a defensively sound side that I need to help create/take chances. That's more about instilling confidence and loosening the shackles a bit, or perhaps changing the personnel. If I've got a side who're shipping 2 goals a game I'm going to have to work so hard drilling their defensive shapes, how they set up at set pieces, their workrate and concentration levels etc.

Might be too little too late. They're scoring now, sure, but nobody has conceded more than them and I'd rather have it the other way round; struggling to score but not conceding 2 goals a game.

Was aiming for the Delboy version of the idiom, but clearly I should stick with the pretentious horse what brung me.

How am I supposed to know that Alex?! There were no winky emojis, there was no italicisation... I'm not Sherlock fucking Holmes y'know!

I could probably prattle on about Luton town as much as I do about Sunderland, but fewer people would care.

Plenty of time, but as I said, to get to 47pts (which may not actually be enough for survival, but is the average) they need 36 points from 28 games. This is a club that's managed 1.3PpG once in a decade. As KD says, if Birmingham beat Middlesbrough Sunderland will be 7pts off safety. They've got a decent run for Coleman to try and get points, facing 3 of the bottom 6, and 2 of those at home. But they look shocking at the back, and their 'keepers are fucking awful. Coleman needs to sort their backline out tout suite, because if he doesn't and these easier fixtures go by without getting them at within touching distance of safety, they've got a pretty stinking late Dec/Early Jan where they could be cut adrift.

It's no guarantee of safety this season but average surviving team has picked up 47pts. If Sunderland are aiming for that they need 36pts from the next 28 games. In other words they're needing 12 wins when they've only managed 16 since May 2015.

I read the last bit as a rebuke of his frankly absurd £400m valuation. Given the club is probably worth around £280m as it stands, £300-£350m is still paying over the odds for us.

Not us here in Cuckland. We sleep in a pool of our liberal tears.

Bet he's got Pepe pyjamas

Rayvin is. The massive fascist.

£25 man. You couldn't get a taxi home from town for that now.