The Fish

There's nothing quite like NN.

He's really struggling now that he's not Plan A. I don't disagree that with a better striker his assists would increase, but then if he's that good lay it on a fucking plate. e.g. Bruno's debut, ASM dances past a few players, Bruno is unmarked in the centre, but ASM has a pop himself. Arguments could be made that he's done the hardwork and deserves a shot, but honestly, it brings to mind Solano. Nobby was one of the most generous footballers I can remember. Always happy to slide a pass through for an easy chance, or lay the freekick off for Shearer to smash home. A bit of humility would do wonders for ASM.

I don't think that's wholly true, there'll be plenty of players there now who were their previously. I do think Rayvin is right about the mentality thing. The manner of the collapses isn't because Guardiola doesn't know how to see out games, he's done it plenty of times before. The manner of the collapse is because the players on the pitch see the finishing line and panic. Like when CT's on his way home and needs a piss, he's fine 5 minutes away, panics at the driveway, sweating as he puts the key to the lock, fumbles and gently sobs as the damp patch grows on his khaki capri pants. Again.

I like him. but he doesn't fit with the future I see us enjoying, so if Fulham offer us £40m for him, fine.

That podcast of his is shit, by the way.

I'd rather Leao or Paqueta and the fee will be similar.

Plus you can drink on a boat on the way there, which is nice.

He does improve us, but not by that much. Character was so important in the January window and while there's always a need for a shit house in a team, I don't think he's the right kind of shit house.

I don't want Richarlison.

It is with great joy that I read Roger's plea for his voters to put a tick in the box and not a cross because at school (where he was a dunce) ticks were for correct and crosses for incorrect. Thereby ensuring anyone who does vote for him with a tick has failed to fill out the form correctly and won't have their vote counted, right? That's outstanding anarchy and I'm here for it.

She's clearly read the "How to present awful takes in modern times" handbook "There are studies" "I have had contact" 'I'm in the majority the other fella isn't and people agree with me' 'Homosexuality is a choice' My favourite is "The Bible says", like it's gospel.

That's still 3 jars a meal, you absolute monster

No it isn't. Pro-life aren't actually pro-life, they're religious ideologues who're imposing their particular brand of misunderstanding of religious text on an entire people. If Pro-Life were actually pro-life their voting patterns would represent that, they'd vote for gun reform, they'd vote for green energy, they'd vote for socialised healthcare, they'd vote against the death penalty, they'd vote for a whole host of issues that would save lives. But they don't, they vote for guns in schools, fracking, freedom to be ripped off by insurance companies and plug 'em in and fire 'em up Cletus! Could women have the Placenta removed? It's their organ afterall. Wouldn't being forced to carry, and birth a child of rape be seen as punishment for a crime you didn't commit? Is being forced by the state to raise a child not forced labour?

This is the crossover comic event you've all been waiting for; Marvel penned Star Wars comic about an Ewok Wicker Man

Well, with such a complex and robust rebuttal, I'm not sure I can continue thinking the way I have. I mean, Lewis' professional football career appeared to me as evidence that he's a footballer. And the reports I've read about Lewis having some injury issue that impacted his decision to stay, appeared to me to have some merit. But when such a sage man as yourself wields words like that... the impact of a trebuchet behind the accuracy of an epee. I'm in awe. Oh, no, wait, you're just a fucking gobshite whose knowledge of modern football begins and ends with whatever is happening down the road.

I agree that Shelvey's upturn in form isn't the phoenix from the flames story some would have you believe, and Willock hasn't even recaptured half the form we saw last season. I geuninely believe there's a player in Sean Longstaff that will serve the club better by being 70% of each of those two at once. Also, could the 4yr deal simply be a way to keep wages down?

Explains why he's always so angry.

Why's everybody getting their kids in blackface?!

Wildly inappropriate for the little'un to black up for a spot of manual labour. Can only assume that was your decision.

Used to live with a Jewish lass who worked at 'Gentleman's club'. We called her the Gaza Stripper.

fugeddaboudit

Is he the worst? I might be biased, contrary or just wrong, but I think there's a player in S.Longstaff who could surpass Shelvey and Willock. He's got better mobility than the former and a better range of passing than the latter. I think he needs coaching, for sure, but I don't think he's doomed to the scrap heap just yet. We could absolutely buy better than him, but I think he's a better option from the bench than Shelvey, at least.

From what I've read there's an element of injury that meant he preferred to stay at Newcastle and receive treatment, rather than go abroad (which was his most likely option). Also, there is proof he's a footballer. Loads of proof. but is there a particular characteristic that you don't like about him? Is there a reason you haven't taken to him? Really, anything comes into sir's mind?

Go and look at the most likely outcomes wherever you fancy and you’ll find only one piss-wet-through gobshite was predicting Newcastle would only get points (not necessarily a win btw) against Norwich in April. You said 1-3pts, we got 12! Twelve, CT. A dozen!