The Fish

You suggested a complete eradication of the species as a potential solution, that to me translates as ALL foreigners. That's an unsurprisingly incorrect translation of what I said. I said kill everyone. EVERYONE. ALL PEOPLE. EVERYBODY. not a damn thing was mentioned about nationality, race colour or creed. if you have issues with that subject then they are yours and not mine. .. you highlight a passage that mentions nothing about segregation, it, in fact, bunches all people as one... the very epitome of racism I'm sure.... Innocent people should comply with police. DanTheMan you speak as if I'm referring directly to this instance of idiocy, I'm not. I'm saying that innocent people should comply with the authority... I couldn't honestly give a rats fanny towel about whther this guy was suficiently medicate or not, his actions could have been controlled and as this is the case then I shall not fault the men and women who are given the impossible and increasingly thankless task of protecting our citizens from terrorism and other abhorrent acts of insanity. Rob W I'll repeat the question if you're innocent why not comply? all of these incidents are examples where your average Joe doesn't simply comply. This isn't psycho-custom officers gunning down someone on sight because they are of an ethnic minority, this is Custom officers instrucfting an individual to a ask and have that instruction ignored or at worst, reversed. so why not comply? what exactly do you lose? what intangible truth is stolen from you with obeying authority? no-ones deserves to die simply because they're stupid, but until they manufacture a workable instant paralysis device, then they will.

don't even remeber my old avatar tbh

nice plant

I'd be interested to find out where I suggested shooting any foreigners... the middle ground seems obvious enough to me Rob W, Innocent people comply with police. ... I fail to see how this simple and solid suggestion can be faulted?

again I go back to the point I raised, Renton... you're a customs officer and someone is screaming he has a bomb... you sure you want to play craps with hundreds of peoples lives? or a turkey shoot with one? Are we to pander to the opinion that everyone is essentially good and if we back off and let people get along nicely everything will be fine? I would argue that human history has shown that in fact People are essentially greedy violent creatures who should (for the greater good) be put down.

you'd take the risk of letting someone carrying a rucksack and screaming he has a bomb simply carry on regardless? .... I'm not sure what is more insane...

Rob you didn't answer the question. But I'll reply to your statement if I may "Innocent people should be given every chance" Surely guilty people would take advantage of this rather large leap of faith? I know that if it were common practise for an exhaustive and comprehensive process to determine guilt before taking lethal action were in place I'd expect my chances of completing my task to increase. If, however, I thought that those encharged with enforcing law were decisive and unafraid to act I'm sure I'd expect success to become less likely. I know that this sounds like ruling with an iron fist, but truly, when you're dealing with creatures whose purpose is to cause as much death and mayhem to innocent people.. I don't think we can apply the same rules as we apply to ourselves. If I were wearing a backpack and hurrying to catch a plane sporting a tan and a large beard and an armed man told me to freeze, well freeze I would. If I were to be walking through cutoms and a burly officer instructed me to step into a room while he performed deeper checks on me, then I'd comply. I'm not a simpering idiot, I simply know that if I do as instructed everything is more likly to go more smoothly.

has been mist. and for why, I haven't the foggiest idea. (it's quite misty here....)

there must be a compromise bewteen the "wait and see" approach advocated by Rob W and the "Shoot first" approach. I would love to see what anyone of us would have done if we were put in the situation of these "Air Marshalls" would we merrily ignore a mans claims he has a bomb, in case he's just mentally ill, would we casually disregard the apparently guilty actions of a man running from us... this current atmosphere of suspicion and fear is not going to be solved by a nanny state, nor is it solved by taking authority from the police and giving it instead to the man on the street. I've a question for Rob W. If you're innocent, why refuse to comply with the police? surely it's sensible and no matter the ignorant neanderthal you're dealing with, to simply nod and smile would hurry the whole misunderstanding along. Nothing good would come of kicking up a fuss. so, I'll repeat it, If you're innocent, why refuse to comply with the police?

well... Narnia is a bunch of uber cheesey dullness. some of the scenes may be unsuitable for younger viewers and most scenes will be unsuitable for older viewers. I know there is a trend to make "dark" films, but I think that it was unnecesary in this film, yet there were definitely characters who didn't make it into the LoTR trilogy. still fun for kids, I'm just pissed off cos I was blackmailed into watching that instead of a comedian who I've heard giood things about from those in the know and those out of the know, but close enough to hear what those in the know ere saying, so maybe people whose back garden backs onto those of the people in the know... ... right bollocks I'm going to get a curry and a DVD..

ok this is the reason girls should never be put in charge of organising things. "Yeah I'll come and watch Narnia with you, but I have to be at the comedy gig by 9 at the very lastest" says I "Ok that's fine" says the ladies time passes "We've got the 5 seats for the 7.30 showing" "... I've got comedy tonight" "Not until 9" "... yess... so I can't do both now" "Why not the film is at 7.30, it'll only be about an hour and a half." "No, it'll be two hours minimum plus 30 minutes of trailers and adverts, plus travel time, meaning the entire thing will take 3 hours meaning I'd entirely miss the comedy." "Well can't you see the comedy tomorrow?" "...no" "well why didn't you tell us that you had plans?" it was the best course of action at this point to leave the room in silence.+-

alex, gemmil and Craig... you may never have a bad word to say about Students. this is the alternative. sweet lordy jesus and all his fishing buddies... for example...

first time me smiling has followed the utterance of her name

Watching Dear Wendy. very cool so far... quite indy... quite fresh and VERY enthralling oh and before someone asks how it can be enthralling if I'm typing in the middle of it, well it's cos I'm taking a tea-break, so fuck you.

is patently obsessed with womens form, striking an unfeasible semblance to a sad aussie masturbater oh and Swindy, I am still in that metropolis called t'Leeeeeds.. are you still old?

shhhhhh, Grown ups talking!

should be pleasantly surprised to learn that fun is 99% of the pursuit.

should realise that it's old hat also that Lesbians have no interest in men and so this reduces the liklihood of my getting anywhere with them.

see the problem is that if I tweak the girls nipple while she's behind the bar I get kicked out and miss the comedy, if I wait until later..... oh and Gemmil I'm not going bald I've simply got an increasingly large face. you are, however, undeniably a ginger robot

it's ok, they're speeding up the "getting ready" progress and I'm listening to Zane Lowe and resisting the urge to sing along to "Hurt"... but not resisting very well and I fear I'm destroying a classic

that sounds so good... I think I might kill you tonight. I'm so hungry I could spit, the house is going out for a meal and the lads were told that we'd be eating at around 7, but of course the girls haven't even begun to get ready yet... Now a man of my age should have, by now, learnt that when a woman says 7, she means 9 and when she says she's not hungry it means she's going to eat all your chips and when she says she loves you it really means "I tolerate you and will leave as soon as your fit mate gets single."

...got that-the-hell-wrong. silly silly yankee

he's doing a set, the compere isn't to great though, he's blatantly a student who was told he was funny by his mates and hasn't been found out yet. It'll the last thursday before I come home to Newcastle so I 'll definitely go there. It's always a good night out, knowing the barstaff certainly helps mind you, trying to get served is a fricking nightmare! there are tables of squealy type girls, buying "Sourz Towers" so that they can drink to forget the fact they're dragging a beanbag around behind them, bless em. So it's a god send when my mate is behind the bar and all I need do is get his attention... which admittedly can be tricky, it once took me leaning over the bar and tweaking his nipple. (it wasn't on show, I'm just a dab hand at the old nipple tweaking) erm... I'm getting a premonition.... Gemmil is going to call someone gay... probably me.

hates all men everywhere... except for the nice ones

coincidently that bloke is playing my local comedy venue on thursday, how about I pop along and give you a review?