The Fish

Yeah I'd love to see a striker come in. I think we could afford both. I don't believe for a second that if we fail in our bid for Maddison we'll shut up shop and go home. If anything, our pursuit of Maddison says we're not done, not by a long shot.

It's not that we can't spunk a shit ton of money on whomever we want, it's just that it makes more sense to keep that wriggle room for when it's needed. It's not needed right now.

Sure, but you don't start at £50m, because if you do, Leicester will demand £60m. And if we had offered £60m, it'd be £70m.

We've signed a top 'keeper, a hugely promising CB, and an uber-reliable PL left back, plus Anderson, Almiron both look good in preseason, so I'd be excited about the January window already. You've been sloshing around in a full nappy since before the window opened man. What is the worst that could happen? We'd be without Wilson for the first half of the season and play with Wood up front. We showed in the 2nd half of the season we could win without Wilson, win enough to stay out of the relegation conversation at least. Then, January comes around and he's no where near fitness? then we'll go off and sign some striker and pay over the odds for. We're not going down this season so, with all due respect, why are you such a little girl?

I don't think he's our best player. I think he's our most dangerous attacking threat.

£9 a month? That's as much as Amazon Prime, or Netflix, ffs. Ours will stay free because we do it for the love of it, yeah? (Plus nee fucker would pay for it )

Honestly, we'll no doubt do one just before the season starts. There are a fuckload of podcasts out there mind.

They're the same person...

That's one of the lads I do the podcast with.

That's what I do.

I said, "England have scored" to the Mrs, and then kept scrolling through twitter. Happy for them and it can only be a good thing for the women's game.

Ah, fair fucks, I got this wrong.

I think you underestimate how much his mother makes.

I don't doubt for a fucking second that he's spunked his entire savings on this trip.

He blames everyone but himself in that piece. Even says Huddersfield sold Stewart on deadline day in January 2000, but the transfer window didn't come into place until 2002, didn't it?

It's possible that the YT income is paying for the travel, the tickets etc. But he's living with his parents who very likely bought his equipment (such at it is), so he's got no overheads because his parents are footing those bills.

Telling that they think the only reason to get a loan is because you haven't the available capital.

The heart wants what the heart wants, and my heart wants glorious, infuriating, brilliant failure.

A lot of pissy pant predictions, if you ask me

Why do you think it's to cover the business done so far?

xMathyGenius will increase, xPantsPissing will not be tolerated

Isn't Gerrard's family a bit nawtee? Has he found a new cash stream for them?

I think an answer to both of these points is the scrutiny that new sponsorship deals are now coming under. If they hadn't tightened up that revenue avenue we may have already seen Fun88 replaced by Saudia or Aramco for tens of millions a year. So, to get those kind of deals, we'd need to be a more attractive brand to sponsor.

I still want Sesko and given we've just taken out a big loan, I'd expect that to be made available for a transfer for or two.