Ketsbaia

Aye, TommyJ Great days those were. That was it "Wheres TommyJ?" quality thread......for makems "TommyJ in the USA" FYI

Aye, TommyJ Great days those were.

There is some debate about how light their car is. Briatore is apparently in a huff and refuses to believe that they're doing anything other than set false times but Gene has came out and said no matter how little fuel they have in their car Ferrari would be unable to match them with the same amount and both Sam Michael and Sebastian Vettel has already came out and said they'll walk over everyone else at Melbourne at this rate. Different people in the paddock seem to have different opinions. Button's big lap time that made everyone sit up and take notice was done on the third lap of a four lap run and similar quali-simulations from other teams didn't come close to knocking it off the board. It looks to me as if the fact they spent all of 2008 developing this seasons car is paying off big time. Even more amazing is the fact i've stumbled across James Allen's blog and in print he's not half as annoying as he is on the television

Brawn GP (formerly Honda) are blitzing testing with Button and Barrichello being in a field of their own. The likes of Marc Gene, Nando Alonso and Sebastian Vettel have said that their respective teams cars are no where near the quality of Brawn GP. On short and long runs they're easily the fastest car out there. I've whacked some cashon Button winning the drivers title, just for shits and giggles McLaren on the other hand have been shite. Propped up the timesheets in testing for most of this week and finally managed to drag themselves off the bottom today, although Hamiltonw as still only 8th fastest.

they might have been told that but none of it has so having accountable notes rather than half truths and spin would be better Didn't Llambias kick off at some lassy for taking notes and then kicked off even more when he found out she was from NUSC? NUSC aren't being pursued by Llambias and co. for defamation so i'd imgaine what they reported was accurate.

Look at the cock on that

That one is from the home game a few months later I think. Those were the days eh! I think that's a second or two before Shearer spins round and elbows him in the face I was so proud of our team after that night in the San Siro. I can remember being amazed we'd played like we did and actually got a draw against the mighty Inter in their own back yard but well fucked off at the same time at the antics of both them and the referee.

I just have this vision of Stevie applauding his fucking radio

Can you spell out why it is abusing a right? The banners as stated in the article would be distasteful imo, but that is about it. If you have freedom of speech (and demonstration) it has to apply to all to work. I think calling people butchers and r@pists who are just doing their jobs maybe considered as abusing that right, wouldn't you? If I was holding up a placard saying something equally abusive and untrue about someone else I would be, quite rightly, charged. There is a long anti-war tradition (demonstrations) in England, it just so happens these are brown men protesting against white men. As I said the banners were distasteful. They were a tad more than distastefull IMO, if it'd been the other way around, or even football fans for that matter, there'd have been dogs in and baton charges. Bet I wouldn't have been protected from "the mob" if I'd held up an "Allah is Satan" banner, I'd have been carted off and charged with one of the many loony-lefty laws this country now has.

I'm anti-war but I think those involved in the protests are daft cunts. You've got to recognise their right to protest but the squaddies weren't the ones who orchestrated the war on a lie. I'd have no qualms if they stood outside Tony Blair's house with their signs and banners but the soldiers? That's just daft.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/11/un-drug-strategy http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/20...drugs-policy-un

Hogan is a grandad

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/c...icle5811412.ece On the Times website but doesn't look like it was ever pulled.

Hippy bollocks, but truthful hippy bollocks none the less. no it isnt, saying people wont suffer health problems if the take pure heroin? Its tripe. If you inject heroin you are eventually going to experience endocarditis, cellulits and whole list of metal health issues. yes prescription drugs arent perfect but they serve a purpose. They are problems with the method of taking it than with the drug itself. You could get those illness' from injecting Dettol into you. There are alternatives such as snorting and smoking it if the 'injecting' part is what is bothering you. No it is the addiction and subsequent inability to function like a normal human being that is bothering me. You can function like a normal human being on heroin, that's the point. You can take a hit and go on about your business, it's when your body starts to withdraw that you become a quivering wreck unable to do anything at all. The sheer addictiveness is the best reason why doing heroin isn't a good idea in the first place but it's a myth that it turns your brain into mush. You really should've layed off Grange Hill when you were a young'un.

Hippy bollocks, but truthful hippy bollocks none the less. no it isnt, saying people wont suffer health problems if the take pure heroin? Its tripe. If you inject heroin you are eventually going to experience endocarditis, cellulits and whole list of metal health issues. yes prescription drugs arent perfect but they serve a purpose. They are problems with the method of taking it than with the drug itself. You could get those illness' from injecting Dettol into you. There are alternatives such as snorting and smoking it if the 'injecting' part is what is bothering you.

I know it seems laughable but that's the truth. There isn't a jot of evidence. If you think or know otherwise please try and find it. overdoses don't occur on your planet? Of course they do. The point i'm trying to make is someone taking shots of pure heroin on a regular basis wont suffer any ill effects because of it. On the subject of ODing I feel I need to whack this quote in from a doctor who has prescribed heroin for over 30 years: "I think that most doctors would tell you that paracetamol is actually quite a dangerous drug when used in overdose, it has a fixed upper limit for its total dose in 24 hours and if you exceed that, perhaps doubling it, you can certainly put yourself at great risk of liver failure and of death, whereas with diamorphine, should you double the dose that you normally were taking, I think the consequence would be to be sleepy for a while and quite possibly not much more than that and certainly no permanent damage as a result." Ha ha what a load of bollocks. A doctor who prescribed heroin defends his decision *shocker.* I was hoping to have a bit of a mental tet-a-tet with you but obviously you've got nothing to back up your opinion, hence your flippant response to a qualified professional's opinion.

Hippy bollocks, but truthful hippy bollocks none the less.

I know it seems laughable but that's the truth. There isn't a jot of evidence. If you think or know otherwise please try and find it. overdoses don't occur on your planet? Of course they do. The point i'm trying to make is someone taking shots of pure heroin on a regular basis wont suffer any ill effects because of it. On the subject of ODing I feel I need to whack this quote in from a doctor who has prescribed heroin for over 30 years: "I think that most doctors would tell you that paracetamol is actually quite a dangerous drug when used in overdose, it has a fixed upper limit for its total dose in 24 hours and if you exceed that, perhaps doubling it, you can certainly put yourself at great risk of liver failure and of death, whereas with diamorphine, should you double the dose that you normally were taking, I think the consequence would be to be sleepy for a while and quite possibly not much more than that and certainly no permanent damage as a result."

I know it seems laughable but that's the truth. There isn't a jot of evidence. If you think or know otherwise please try and find it.

How though? I've used drugs before and i've known dealers. Your average street dealer makes fuck all off the drugs they sell in the grand scheme of things - this idea that all dealers are flush with money is completely bogus. Drugs filter down from the people at the top. As they filter down they're cut with more and more stuff so the product suffers but the price goes up. The government would be at the top of said chain if it was legal so not only would the price be lower than your average dealer but the quality would be much better.

Never said we should legalise heroin outright, although it is fact that about 500 people in the whole country were dependant on heroin prior to it being banned. These people continued to lead normal lives and live just as long as other people. Children's novelist Enid Bagnold lived to 91 and spent the final dozen years of her life injecting 350mg of heroin a day after a hip operation while still living quite happily and not mugging anyone. It was banned in this country because of pressure from the US (who themselves banned it based on lies from unqualified professionals. The input of doctors and people who worked with it was all but ignored) and one or two scandals in this country involving the illegal sale of it. When it was banned it was pushed into the hands of dealers and those who had been addicted had to start paying for it and were forced into crime to try and pay for their habit. Not only that but people who weren't addicted to heroin were suddenly being pushed this amazing new wonder drug by their dealers and became addicted. Prices go up, as does the number of addicted parties as does the problem. The classic appearance of a heroin addict - gaunt, pale, living in squalor etc. is not brought on by the drug itself but by the way heroin addicts have to live to feed their dependancy. There is absolutely no medical evidence that heroin has a negative physical or mental effect on the person using it (barring the occasional bout of nausea and constipation). Paracetamol is more dangerous that heroin. The biggest problem with heroin is that it's hugely addictive and they are forced to buy it at the price no matter how high set by the dealers. Those dealers cut the drug with other chemicals which you really shouldn't be putting into your body, like drain cleaner or sawdust causing all manner of problems for the user - most of which will see them in a hospital being seen to by your good self J69. There are many other drugs out there, alot of which do have negative effects on the physical health of people. Two of the largest culprits are on sale in your local corner shop. I personally believe that we should legalise the lot and allow the general public to pick and choose. The money stays away from the crims and goes back into government coffers allowing them to put it to good use. The 'war against drugs' is not being waged for our own good but because it's a vote winner. We're constantly told drugs are a cause of all the worlds ills and not a symptom. We fill our prisons up with people who have done nothing wrong other than become helplessly addicted to a substance. If you put the cold hard facts in the hands of Joe Public and allow them to decide whether drugs should be legalised or not when the votes are cast we'd see every party do a 180 degree turn on their policy towards drugs. Gordon Brown will be telling us how he popped 17 E's and had an all night session with Judge Jules when he went to Ibiza, Call Me Dave will be telling us how he often spent nights alone toking on his bong and trying to synch up Dark Side of the Moon with the Wizard of Oz. Christ, we'll not be able to get moved for Lib Dem MPs wanting to tell us how they snorted a line of a rent boys boner. Criminalisation of drugs strikes me as bizarre if not downright callous. In the words of Nick Davies: "You have to go back to the trenches of Flanders to find generals who have been so incompetent, so dishonest, so awesomely destructive towards those for whom they claim to care." Sorry for the rant.

The fact drugs are illegal isn't a good enough deterrent in itself - people still take them regardless. In some cases the criminalisation of certain drugs has made the situation worse - just look at the statisitics regarding heroin. Legalising them would at least take the money spent on them out of the hands of criminals.

Sign up last night and i've been banned already. I've only made two posts. Maybe it was because i've shown a slight leaning towards NUSC, which means the patter in the message they sent to Christmas Tree about being a 'healthy mixture of pro and anti-Ashley' members is complete toss. If you don't agree with them you're out on your ear.

Jesus wept