-
Posts
2213 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by Ken
-
Cumshots and other great questions of our Day
Ken replied to Christmas Tree 's topic in General Chat
Eh? Why such a cold response? I thought my question was just an extension of the OP's initial query. And just going on your past history here, with much of your contributions being of a sexual nature with even a link to a porn site iirc, I'm completely taken aback that you've responded the way you did, considering that you recognise what sexual empowerment is and taking into account some sexual activities initiated by the female side to demonstrate her empowerment doesn't always go according to the plan. I would have preferred a response like, "Yes, but I don't want to talk about it", instead. -
Cumshots and other great questions of our Day
Ken replied to Christmas Tree 's topic in General Chat
Protein and Vitamin C to kick start the day... While on the subject of blowjobs, soccermom, have you ever gagged on a penis, you know, like you see a lot of in porns of today? Gagged so badly, that you make that distinct gagging sound, causing you to stop in your tracks and take his manhood out of your mouth, all the while having a teardrop or two streaming down your face? -
Cumshots and other great questions of our Day
Ken replied to Christmas Tree 's topic in General Chat
You should get your husband started on pineapple juice, it makes spunk sweet. I drink plenty, and my current girlfriend appreciates it. -
It has nothing to do with turning shit overnight imo, his problem is a combination of both form loss and injury, they are intertwined just like back and hamstring injuries are, which it seems Ferdinand is suffering from now. How long has he had his back/hamstring complaints for? It certainly hasn't just flared up recently, it's been a persistent and ongoing problem for him and doesn't seem to be going away. I smell trouble for both club and country. I don't need the media telling me that.
-
Fucking hell, thanks for the essay. Do you work this hard in your paid job? Now read carefully you pot-bellied fanny, here's a quick auto-biography for you. I was born in England. My mother's from Gosforth, my father's a 2nd generation Australian of Scottish descent. I left England when I was 5 to live here in Australia. I have dual citizenship. I was educated in Australia. I have worked in Japan (went to the WC in 2002) before settling in a job here in Sydney. I have been on half the continents of the world to travel (Not North or South America nor Antarctica). I am 32 and have been a football follower and have supported Newcastle Utd all my life. Without waffling on and without attempting to retort to every single point you've made, let us wait to June to see what is said and written, I have no doubt blind optimism will filter through. I know how the media in London behaves. The arrogance and inability to correctly ponder is a blight and a joke at times. They get the piss taken out of them here, yet sadly the journalistic approach here in Sydney is being followed and copied. The irony of it. I firmly believe English football lacks something that some countries of continental Europe and Brazilian football has. Countries like Spain, Holland, Germany , Brazil or Argentina (when they're organised) to name a few... My opinion of Ferdinand wasn't media-driven, he has definitely lost it. He is slower and has gotten caught out of position a number of times this season. Having a bad back and hamstrings is a pretty serious thing and he will be a weak link despite you trying to convince me otherwise. You are right though, England need the luck of the draw to do well in the WC. Alright I'll make a re-assessment of England's chances and say that if Terry can cover for Ferdinand's projected fuck-ups, they will make the quarters. Are you happy now, Stevieintoon?
-
What concerns me about the Aussies is the lack of pace and lack of youth in the squad. Kewell would have to be the quickest yet he may play lone-man striker as there are obvious lack of options there. One things for sure under Pim Verbeek, there won't be many goals scored as much as there won't be many goals conceded by his team. If the Aussies make it out of the group stages it'll be job well done in my opinion. This WC could be one of the dullest in recent memory tbh. England, Switzerland, Italy, France, Greece, NK, SK, South Africa... the list just goes on, not exactly teams that swarm and look for goals, and the Argies under Maradona are an absolute shambles; no tactics and no shape. I know very little of the African sides but at least they'll have a go. It'll all come down to momentum and if the Krauts build up theirs, then I see them taking it out. Spain are a real chance too. To win and in order: Brazil England Spain I don't think England have a hope in hell, but I'll be happy to eat my hat if they come close... I hope that's as accurate as your Ashes prediction. I was mostly stirring in the Ashes thread, I did say Australia were shit in between all that banter. I just think England lack something technically that puts them behind Spain, Brazil and even Germany, but certainly not in discipline and organisation. England are far better organised this time round, there's no doubting that, Capello has managed to tame some of the tarts in his squad. However I'd be concerned with Rio Ferdinand. His best days are behind him and he has too many mistakes in him, and I have a sneaking suspicion that he will be absolute gash, a complete liability, which could break England one way or another. We'll see, Alex. We'll see.
-
What concerns me about the Aussies is the lack of pace and lack of youth in the squad. Kewell would have to be the quickest yet he may play lone-man striker as there are obvious lack of options there. One things for sure under Pim Verbeek, there won't be many goals scored as much as there won't be many goals conceded by his team. If the Aussies make it out of the group stages it'll be job well done in my opinion. This WC could be one of the dullest in recent memory tbh. England, Switzerland, Italy, France, Greece, NK, SK, South Africa... the list just goes on, not exactly teams that swarm and look for goals, and the Argies under Maradona are an absolute shambles; no tactics and no shape. I know very little of the African sides but at least they'll have a go. It'll all come down to momentum and if the Krauts build up theirs, then I see them taking it out. Spain are a real chance too. You know if you type "clueless cunts talking shit about a sport they have no clue about" in speech marks, does toontastic come up???? England and I quote "not exactly a team that swarms and looks for goals", what a country that scored THIRTY FOUR, six more than anyone else, in fuckin qualifying. A country who scored NINE in TWO games against another country who were then ranked SIXTH in the world, who hadn't lost a meaningful game at home in 15 years, yet we went there and won 1-4. Oh dear. Honest to god I don't expect people to be statistically as accurate as John Motson but this cunt fuck me. The most pleasing thing about the Capello era is the amount of goals we now score, I'm ashamed to be a Newcastle fan sometimes for what the first Keegan era has brung us. Fans from around the world who haven't got a clue, and fans from around Britain and Ireland who haven't got a clue, sometimes I'd have the Ossie Ardiles days back me. There are many things you should be ashamed of you sloth, the way you carry on. You are a wanker, a funny wanker though I'll give you that. My comment wasn't statistically based. I just watch England and nothing excites me about them. I am glad that offends you though. What amuses me, apart from your never ending errant comments about everything, anything and nothing, Stevie, is the traditional beating of the drums of victory by the English media who are completely unaware of the other competing nations before it all starts and during the tournaments, and when they fall by the wayside as they invariable do every time, they can't work out why. Everything is to be blamed except an obvious lack of class. Just for the record, I think England will make the last sixteen maybe even the last eight with a bit of luck, and they will average something like 1.4 goals per game. Anything higher than that and I will be truly flabbergasted!
-
No, see you are so fucking wrong. Football actually is the biggest sport in this god forsaken sporting hole. All the others have free to air tv deals, football doesn't but there are over 400,000 registered footballers in Australia, the other sorts don't even come close. And it's the only sport not subsidised by either the sporting body or government so fees are twice the price of other codes. By the way, the last world cup, which was at fuck off 3 and 5 o'clock in the morning kickoff times, actually rated higher than the grand finals of both the league and aerial ping pong grand finals for the same year. Don't believe the mainstream Australian media, their vested interest is in all other sports. This bit is 100% correct. But I must say, participation rates don't equate to popularity as a spectator sport for me, despite the WC final out-rating the rugby league and AFL, the WC comes around once every four years. Frank Lowy is the saviour of football in Australia though, trying to make it mainstream rather than a game for ethnics. But it will take time, a long, long time before it comes even close to rugby league or Aussie Rules. Winning the rights to host a WC may help, but surprise, surprise, who are voicing their discontent over those efforts?
-
What concerns me about the Aussies is the lack of pace and lack of youth in the squad. Kewell would have to be the quickest yet he may play lone-man striker as there are obvious lack of options there. One things for sure under Pim Verbeek, there won't be many goals scored as much as there won't be many goals conceded by his team. If the Aussies make it out of the group stages it'll be job well done in my opinion. This WC could be one of the dullest in recent memory tbh. England, Switzerland, Italy, France, Greece, NK, SK, South Africa... the list just goes on, not exactly teams that swarm and look for goals, and the Argies under Maradona are an absolute shambles; no tactics and no shape. I know very little of the African sides but at least they'll have a go. It'll all come down to momentum and if the Krauts build up theirs, then I see them taking it out. Spain are a real chance too. To win and in order: Brazil England Spain I don't think England have a hope in hell, but I'll be happy to eat my hat if they come close...
-
What concerns me about the Aussies is the lack of pace and lack of youth in the squad. Kewell would have to be the quickest yet he may play lone-man striker as there are obvious lack of options there. One things for sure under Pim Verbeek, there won't be many goals scored as much as there won't be many goals conceded by his team. If the Aussies make it out of the group stages it'll be job well done in my opinion. This WC could be one of the dullest in recent memory tbh. England, Switzerland, Italy, France, Greece, NK, SK, South Africa... the list just goes on, not exactly teams that swarm and look for goals, and the Argies under Maradona are an absolute shambles; no tactics and no shape. I know very little of the African sides but at least they'll have a go. It'll all come down to momentum and if the Krauts build up theirs, then I see them taking it out. Spain are a real chance too.
-
Is he right or are you right? You'll have to be more clear about why we can't both be right. Where have I said anything about German, Israeli or UK Intelligence? What I find hard to fathom is, why you would be so very serious with a dweeb likeflop???? The guy's a fucking gonad. Do you feel disheartened when he responds back to you saying you don't have a clue with and attached to his comments??? For fucks sake.
-
Absolutely disappointing this result, don't I look a fool now, eh? Merven Hughes and Andrew Hilditch can go to buggary, shit selections all series has led to this result. Not taking away anything from England though, of course they deserved the victory and the Ashes and it was an exciting one to follow. But Stuart Clark being overlooked for the first three tests, Phillip Hughes being dropped for an injury prone one-day allrounder and not having a specialist spinner in this last test is just gobsmacking stupidity. Being born in England doesn't make this loss any less painful, let me tel ya... On a lighter note though, hearing Lily Allen being cheeky on BBC and that see-through little ensemble she was wearing
-
Fuck off fish. It's only the pompous cunts such as yourself we enjoy beating - the rest of Britain is just an island north of WA!
-
No, just Ken's your typical wum tbh. Nowhere to be seen when they're doing shit. To be honest Alex, I think this Aussie team is shit, regardless of the last result. The selections, the tactics, the favouritism towards certain players etc. It is just with great fortune that Australia is playing a team who are even shitter than they.
-
You know, Stuart Law has put his hand up. Ozzie Stuart Law
-
Last time I checked, Australia weren't ahead in the series, nor have they been at any point. Yet despite this, Engerland need a victory to claim the Ashes.
-
It would seem no pommy bastard, not even a fat 40 year old who couldn't bend over to touch his toes, wants any part of this English setup. And to think I expected this series to be competitive. Perhaps the unwashed should consider calling up a Pakistani, Indian, South African or an Australian ex-pat on holiday over there to save them. What else have they got to lose?
-
I'm glad you've not included my name there. Yes, England are struggling. Thank God Stuart Clarke has finally been given a shot to add parity to the game. Reports were that he wasn't in the eleven initially. Straight away I thought Ponting had picked his favourite yet ineffective bowling attack yet again. I think it's only fair the series is tied 1-1 after this game has ended.....
-
Sorry mate, been missing in action for a few weeks at my holiday house in Davistown on the Central Coast. The fishing is lovely up there but I don't have access to the internet nor do I have pay television which literally puts me out in the wilderness in regards to goings-on around the globe. I haven't intentionally avoided the subject. Looks as though I haven't missed very much anyway (in regards to the cricket and the owner status of the football club).
-
I thought Hilfenhaus should definitely have had more overs, he was taken out of the attack way too early. I don't understand why Ponting took him off and persisted with Mitchell Johnson. Johnson absolutely wasted an opportunity with the second new ball. Anyway a draw is a decent enough result. I don't blame England for time wasting. They are absolutely outclassed in every facet of the game. Let them send out a fat bastard of a physio to waste time. Seeing him waddle on then off with his boobs jiggling about was probably the highlight of the test match for me, besides the 4 centuries made. I really can't see England winning any of the next 4 matches. They offer nothing. They get their hopes up by beating a bunch of part timers from the Caribbean and think they're in with a chance against Australia. The best they can hope for are 4 draws. Who knows, we may see that fat bastard waddling onto the ground again eh? And England will once again celebrate a draw as if it were a win. Any team would have celebrated a draw under the circumstances, a bit like you lot did in 2005. I'd think anyone with a bit of a clue wouldn't celebrate like it was a win though. Not saying we deserved much out of the game but I think you arrogance is a bit misplaced since Monty Panesar (one of the biggest 'rabbits' in test cricket) looked like he could have batted all day against your average attack. And how is a draw a 'decent enough result' for a team who 'outclassed' us 'in every facet of the game'? Many people celebrated the result as if it were a win. Perhaps this is why England are inferior; they don't expect to win against Australia and rightly so. And Alex, tell me one area that England were better in... England, I believe are second rate, despite Australia's current lack of a game killer. What have they really got to offer in the next 4 games? Onions?!? Who the fuck is Onions... you'll need potatoes, shitakes and rice plus more and more carbs before you get even close. I'm not saying we weren't inferior in every aspect though. The point is it was a great result under the circumstances because of that. And winning / losing has very little to do with fans' expectations as I think a lot of people thought England had a great chance of recapturing the Ashes and still do so I wouldn't say there's much to your argument that we the difference in the teams is down to fans not expecting to win. Also, I think the celebrations were largely short-lived because we were outplayed (I was delighted because we should have lost when you looked at the situation we were in but not kidding myself we were any great shakes). I still think Australia will win because although they aren't the side they were 4 or 2 years ago we're nowhere near the side we were last time we played you lot in England. We've been poor over the last couple of years in particular. We've got a bit of a chance if we up our game though I think because it's in England and the lack of experience against swing might be a factor. I actually think on paper we have at least as good an attack as yours too (especially with Brett Lee out). Trouble is we'll have to perform at nearly 100% in every session of every test and we haven't looked like doing that lately. Both teams are significantly weaker compared to last time they both played in England, Alex, and in all honesty the draw should (rightfully) be seen as a more significant result to England than it was to Australia considering what went on on the final day's play, and for that reason I can totally understand the celebrations that went on after the game ended (despite the banter). Ponting gets a lot of criticism for his captaincy and he has made some really questionable tactical plays in past series against India and South Africa. He won't ever be able to shake off those demons I believe, and he'll be heavily scrutinised over the coming weeks for not being able to kill off games, rightly or wrongly. It's that lack of a game killer which will keep the series interesting in my opinion, and it's a great distraction, as I pointed out earlier, to the sorry state of affairs that are currently being played out at the football club. Can't wait for the second test to begin...
-
I thought Hilfenhaus should definitely have had more overs, he was taken out of the attack way too early. I don't understand why Ponting took him off and persisted with Mitchell Johnson. Johnson absolutely wasted an opportunity with the second new ball. Anyway a draw is a decent enough result. I don't blame England for time wasting. They are absolutely outclassed in every facet of the game. Let them send out a fat bastard of a physio to waste time. Seeing him waddle on then off with his boobs jiggling about was probably the highlight of the test match for me, besides the 4 centuries made. I really can't see England winning any of the next 4 matches. They offer nothing. They get their hopes up by beating a bunch of part timers from the Caribbean and think they're in with a chance against Australia. The best they can hope for are 4 draws. Who knows, we may see that fat bastard waddling onto the ground again eh? And England will once again celebrate a draw as if it were a win. Any team would have celebrated a draw under the circumstances, a bit like you lot did in 2005. I'd think anyone with a bit of a clue wouldn't celebrate like it was a win though. Not saying we deserved much out of the game but I think you arrogance is a bit misplaced since Monty Panesar (one of the biggest 'rabbits' in test cricket) looked like he could have batted all day against your average attack. And how is a draw a 'decent enough result' for a team who 'outclassed' us 'in every facet of the game'? Many people celebrated the result as if it were a win. Perhaps this is why England are inferior; they don't expect to win against Australia and rightly so. And Alex, tell me one area that England were better in... England, I believe are second rate, despite Australia's current lack of a game killer. What have they really got to offer in the next 4 games? Onions?!? Who the fuck is Onions... you'll need potatoes, shitakes and rice plus more and more carbs before you get even close. Yes, just like you did at Old Trafford in 2005... In fact from what I recall, Lee and McGrath seemed a lot happier with that than the England batsmen. They were only one wicket away from defeat. Stop living in the past, just concentrate on the nows and soons
-
Ponting chinned by Fletcher. Didn't England lose an Ashes series 5-0 under Fletch???
-
I view the forum quite frequently, also post comments up time and time again, and most recently when relegation was official. Better concentrating on the bloody cricket than the shower of shite that is Newcastle United Football Club at the moment wouldn't you agree?
-
Middle name, shortened. It's not some random...
-
I thought Hilfenhaus should definitely have had more overs, he was taken out of the attack way too early. I don't understand why Ponting took him off and persisted with Mitchell Johnson. Johnson absolutely wasted an opportunity with the second new ball. Anyway a draw is a decent enough result. I don't blame England for time wasting. They are absolutely outclassed in every facet of the game. Let them send out a fat bastard of a physio to waste time. Seeing him waddle on then off with his boobs jiggling about was probably the highlight of the test match for me, besides the 4 centuries made. I really can't see England winning any of the next 4 matches. They offer nothing. They get their hopes up by beating a bunch of part timers from the Caribbean and think they're in with a chance against Australia. The best they can hope for are 4 draws. Who knows, we may see that fat bastard waddling onto the ground again eh? And England will once again celebrate a draw as if it were a win. Any team would have celebrated a draw under the circumstances, a bit like you lot did in 2005. I'd think anyone with a bit of a clue wouldn't celebrate like it was a win though. Not saying we deserved much out of the game but I think you arrogance is a bit misplaced since Monty Panesar (one of the biggest 'rabbits' in test cricket) looked like he could have batted all day against your average attack. And how is a draw a 'decent enough result' for a team who 'outclassed' us 'in every facet of the game'? Many people celebrated the result as if it were a win. Perhaps this is why England are inferior; they don't expect to win against Australia and rightly so. And Alex, tell me one area that England were better in... England, I believe are second rate, despite Australia's current lack of a game killer. What have they really got to offer in the next 4 games? Onions?!? Who the fuck is Onions... you'll need potatoes, shitakes and rice plus more and more carbs before you get even close.