Jump to content

Ken

Members
  • Posts

    2213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Ken

  1. No not at all, but I believe mysteriousness is a wonderful quality to have. And I believe for you, mysteriousness on the internet keeps you going at your age, so long may it continue. think what you like lad. Shame you don't qualify what you were harping on about though. I suppose it's because you can't and you know you can't I see you've prepared your defense by sifting thorough my history here over the years. How long did that take you and was it worthwhile? You've made my night, Leazes, you really have. You are a character. You take obsession to another level. on the contrary dear boy, it was the first post I found when I clicked on your profile. I'm not that bothered I would search deeply through your posts, I can see pretty much straightaway you are one of those gormless idiots who thought replacing ambitious owners with similarly ambitious owners would be automatic and a formality. Nowt like someone making the occasional entry into here and being obsessed enough to specifically disagree with me and then being unable to back up your claims with factual comments ? Go ahead. Tell us what "shite" you are talking about. And do you still "trust Johnny Hall" who "helped" build the club [with who I wonder] ? Your irrational hatred of the people who really built the club and misplaced optimism of Mike Ashley would be hilarious if it wasn't for the fact that he has dragged the hardcore of 20,000 supporters with him ie those who will be left if he continues runnning the club on the same levels as the likes of Blackburn, Burnley and loses our best players to clubs like Wigan. The game's starting in ten minutes, Leazes. Are you more concerned about past semi-glories and the brickwall we hit in the end, or the actual game at hand now? Please say the latter rather than the former.
  2. No not at all, but I believe mysteriousness is a wonderful quality to have. And I believe for you, mysteriousness on the internet keeps you going at your age, so long may it continue. think what you like lad. Shame you don't qualify what you were harping on about though. I suppose it's because you can't and you know you can't I see you've prepared your defense by sifting thorough my history here over the years. How long did that take you and was it worthwhile? You've made my night, Leazes, you really have. You are a character. You take obsession to another level.
  3. No not at all, but I believe mysteriousness is a wonderful quality to have. And I believe for you, mysteriousness on the internet keeps you going at your age, so long may it continue.
  4. 1. What would be a good season for Newcastle? Where will you finish in the league? Anything above 17th. Realistically though and I'm going out on a limb here, 12th. 2. What do you think would be a good season for Everton? Where do you think we will finish in the league? Anything less than top ten is a step back. I think you'll come eighth. 3. Who is your best player? Jose Enrique. I can't help but have a chuckle at those who named Ben Arfa though. Well, more than a chuckle actually. 4. Which Everton player do you fear most? This season, Arteta. Cahill in years gone by clearly, but I think he's on the way down at Everton. 5. How do you rate David Moyes as a manager? For the resources he has had, brilliant! 6. What do you think of Everton fans? How do you rate our support? Don't know to be honest. Can't be worse than Liverpool's though. In fact, that's probably an insult to you. Sorry. 7. What will the score be? 1-1
  5. The shite you've posted over the years (let's say two), Leazes, putting it in paperback form I would burn 1/4 of it and the rest I would give to the population of the world to allow them to use it as toilet paper. Bog roll would not be required to be manufactured for at least a decade. Tree huggers would adore you.
  6. Not much, I'm an infrequent poster, too busy you see. I like to take the piss face to face (I'm an Aussie), and I've taken the piss out off poor Stevie here quite recently exposing his drivel laden ways. I don't mind having the piss taken out of me as well though. Some would argue I'm in the know with current and world affairs, traveled and studied a bit and all that.
  7. It has been 13 years actually, has anything changed? In NSW? Pubs may be forced to close early in Sydney soon.
  8. Is eskimo no longer politically correct?
  9. Look at me look at me I'm here. Fuck off you foreign cunt. Stick to hunting seals. I'm Australian not Alaskan you clown. The culture differences between an Aussie and an eskimo are significant so at least attempt to make the gibes relevant. Look, I may have been harsh in my post about why England do not deserve to host the WC and I'll admit to my inaccuracies... at least I'm man enough to admit them. So I'll admit I was harsh about the English weather as it isn't all that bad in June/July is it? Stick to battering Lebonese then you cunt. We could wipe you out with the press of a button you mouthy convict. What's this "we" business? If by "we" you mean England then you are off your head. After all, and first and foremost, permission would need to be granted by big brother Yankee Doodle and he'd give you all a collective slap on the forehead with his cock for suggesting something so ridiculous.
  10. It has been 13 years actually, has anything changed?
  11. Look at me look at me I'm here. Fuck off you foreign cunt. Stick to hunting seals. I'm Australian not Alaskan you clown. The culture differences between an Aussie and an eskimo are significant so at least attempt to make the gibes relevant. Look, I may have been harsh in my post about why England do not deserve to host the WC and I'll admit to my inaccuracies... at least I'm man enough to admit them. So I'll admit I was harsh about the English weather as it isn't all that bad in June/July is it?
  12. One of many examples why England don't deserve to host the World Cup in 2018, aside from the warm beer, slags staggering around the streets with broken off high heels, broken glass bottles strewn across pathways and roads, and pot-bellied clowns with shaven heads wearing the cross of St George yelling out, "Weez English!" The WC should be given to the country with the better footballing culture so I expect Spain/Portugal to be given the go ahead in 2018 and with that a guarantee that I will be over there enjoying the festivities. At least I won't need my raincoat in Spain, not only for the reason of shitty weather that is a constant in England but also because of the water cannons I'd expect that they'd need to use to disperse the yobs as well.
  13. Same here, on top of that they've played consistantly better than anyone else in the tournament, and usually it ends up being some dodgy shit like Italy in 2006 or to a much lesser extent France in 98 winning it when there were teams who played much better but didn't get the luck. Spain have brought very little to the World Cup by comparison, without Villa they'd be back home already. Really hope it's either the Germans or the Dutch. Really? Obviously the Dutch who have won every game in regular time aren't as consistent as a team who lost to Serbia and struggled to beat Ghana. The Germans have been great but the Dutch have been better. What a load of nonsense. The dutch have pilloried by their press. They played shit in all the group games, should've been 3-0 down at HT against Brazil, and were far from dominant against Slovakia. They've had the results but have been no where near as impressive as Germany. The Dutch have had more consistent results than Germany. Germany have been more impressive in most of their games. I look forward to a Uruguay Spain Final although I would prefer to see the Dutch give Germany a good hoofing in Jo'burg. More consistent? Because they lost with 10 men for 65 minutes against Serbia? The dutch have been functional and fortunate. It's a non-argument as to who has been more impressive, imo the Germans have delivered the best three performances of the tournament. Slovakia were easily the equals of Holland. Germany 4 0 1 13 2 Holland 5 0 0 9 3 Bullshit! You're obviously watching a different world cup. Germany were beaten before they went to 10 men and as I said Ghana could have had them if they had better composure in front of goal. Both teams showed that if you mark Schweinsteiger out of the match and press their defence then they are fucked. The Dutch on the other hand have been cruising along only doing what is necessary and the Brasil game was an example of their ability to step up a gear when things are going against them. Brasil may have been their first real test but they proved their point. Hopefully it will be an asian referee for the final for you anarl. Purest form of pish I've read on this message board. Even the dutch would say pipe down. Fuck me, you've obviously never reread most of the shite you post Pretends it never happened, like you can try and get away with in a verbal exchange. This one sums him up;
  14. Stevie's Waterloo? Why because you, another Asian and a lad from Burnley thought the ref had a good game? Because you're a racist cunt. How am I racist cunt for suggesting that in my opinion the referee was out of his depth YOU FUCKIN MASSIVE NOB. The only reason you're even suggesting that is because of your Asian heritage you fuckin arsehole. You're a bad as a scouser on the fiddler, or someone who cries rape when they haven't been. So tell us in all your wisdom, you pot -bellied clown , who would you have preferred to have been put in charge? A European did you mention, you goose... what an Italian, a Spanish or maybe even a Frenchman, eh? They would have fucked that game last night!
  15. Right, so 31 pages and everyone still agrees England will always be shit whatever the FA attempt to do....
  16. One would hope you are right, however there are many citizens in NK who believe Kimmie is the son of a god. "Rainbows were seen everywhere in the sky and the dreary winter weather turned into glorious spring the day our Dear Leader was born", as the text books point out in NK's school curriculum. There is little science, or maths to learn, but rather a philosophy to be subservient in what we would call a cult state. It must also be pointed out that aside from the full-time army of 1.5 million they have a civilian defence force consisting of about 4 million. A nasty band of guerilla warfare makers there ready to infiltrate the South if the need arises.
  17. Yep, it's going to be an extremely long June for us, with nothing to look forward to at all.
  18. It may be outdated, but any country's arsenal which includes 1000 tanks, 1500 planes, 2 or 3 low-yield nukes and a means to deliver them, and 6000 artillery pieces all able to reach SK's capital, Seoul, you would be a fool to sneeze and overlook their capabilities. Add to that 1.5 million soldiers willing to die to defend and/or attack, hungry or not. Plus a civilian population brainwashed into thinking that they are the ones being antagonised by outside elements (SK, USA) and who therefore would be hostile. The level of fanaticism both by the military and civilian population would almost be unprecedented, well not seen since the Pacific war by the Japanese. There is no way anybody could topple NK and certainly not within a month as you believe. That being said nobody wants full-scale war on the Korean peninsula. SK dreads it as Seoul, the hub of its economy would be annihilated in any attack with no means of defence against one. Once those missiles and artillery pieces launch there are only minutes to react to them. The US would dread war as the first thing vapourised would be the 20,000 odd marines stationed in SK as they would be required in the frontline of any attack. Precision bombing would not win a war in Korea, and after such experiences as Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan the American civilian population would be dead set against any such thing and the resulting casualities. America's military is also stretched to the limit as it is now without the need of a new front. Also, China owns America's debt so they have in effect one arm tied behind their backs in that respect. China would be against any such war as they would face a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of refuges swarming across the border into China. Also, China and NK are not as close as they once were (relations during the 1950's) and just a few weeks ago NK's dear leader cut short his trip to Beijing after having a request for financial aid (and perhaps even a commitment of solidarity if the shit hits the fan) rejected by the Chinese. China would also be against anything which would hurt its economy and a war would undoubtedly harm its progress. And Japan would not favour war as no doubt NK would lob a few missiles at Tokyo in the name of revenge for being a former colonial ruler. Nobody wants war, and I don't think there will be war, but if these naval blockades imposed on NK result in starving the army, Kimmie may want to lash out.
  19. Ken

    German

    Thems. Fuck it.
  20. Looking forward to seeing Dave view this thread. Fuck me, what it's like to be an 81 year old senile fool on an internet forum eh?
  21. why do YOU defend them ? You know what they would do to gays don't you ? Not being funny like you're prob a decent bloke but explain ? The armed forces' stance on gays being far more progressive, both institutionally and individually. they are being forced to move with the times, it doesn't mean they are happy with it, but if you think that you wouldn't mind someone looking at your knob and fancying you when they stand next to you in a shower then thats up to you Have you ever served in the armed forces you dopey old geezer? Or how about leaving you "safehaven" of the 5 mile radius around your home. Seriously, you know fuck all you clown. How old are you anyway... 75? Don't question his life experience! ..or his soft cock. This fool seriously needs to question his belief systems. FFS, I've seen him carry on about Hall/Shephard, is it any reason why NO told him to piss off? How long before he's asked to take a holiday from here and wake up to himself?
  22. why do YOU defend them ? You know what they would do to gays don't you ? Not being funny like you're prob a decent bloke but explain ? The armed forces' stance on gays being far more progressive, both institutionally and individually. they are being forced to move with the times, it doesn't mean they are happy with it, but if you think that you wouldn't mind someone looking at your knob and fancying you when they stand next to you in a shower then thats up to you Have you ever served in the armed forces you dopey old geezer? Or how about leaving your "safehaven" that is the 5 mile radius around your home. Seriously, you know fuck all you clown. How old are you anyway... 75?
  23. I never thought of it that way. Perhaps she can respond and clarify.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.