spongebob toonpants

I agree with that, I never found him funny in the slightest

Yep, I am hooked on this one and loving every minute. I enjoy it as a pantomime as much as the next man, but I do also genuinely find the whole big brother phenomenum fascinating 80512[/snapback] Let's hope something good comes out of it and Barrymore 'buggered' his career for good. 80517[/snapback] I must admit I have reservations about watching Barrymore, he really does seem to be a bit close to the edge.

Yep, I am hooked on this one and loving every minute. I enjoy it as a pantomime as much as the next man, but I do also genuinely find the whole big brother phenomenum fascinating

Ironic coming from soemone who thought the Pope was decent harmless old bloke. Big Brothers appeal to me lies in watching the desconstruction of personality that takes place, even more interesting when it the celebrity facade that deconstructs, or in this series implodes. The twist in this series with the non-celeb even deconstructs what it means to be a celebrity. If as looks likely Chantelle wins and her imaginary song becomes a hit it will possibbly be the apotheosis of post modern culture

Yer dads a fucking dinosaur 78658[/snapback] fyp I am the other side of this equation, I am educating my children with the Clash, Ramones Undertones, a bit of Elvis, Primal Scream and JAMC, and of course Kylie

If gorillas dont like being coats they should just hurry up and evolve

I think it implies it but does not offer proof conclusive. Rob's still a twat though but isnt he?! 77602[/snapback] Arey you inferring hes a twat?

correlation does not imply causality

obsessed

Quoting Ally's post is fun! 77175[/snapback] Nope. Hasnt really done it for me

Ian Rush 0-2

I still remember Bournemouth in 1992..... 76553[/snapback] Brighton 3rd Round. Cant remember when. 1985/6? We must be able to do either of thos two tho, shirley?! 76556[/snapback] Trelford fucking Mills. I am old enough to remember H******d, ths has disaster written all over it

My blood just ran cold

Isnt there some sort of "gentlemans agreement" amongst premiership chairman that you dont approach each others managers during the season? I also wonder, assuming we dont have anybody lined up, whether sacking him before the end of the season would make the job less tempting in some ways, as from the outside at least it might reinforce FS as being a bit trigger happy.

He was quoted on SSN as saying "I am still more scared of the wife than the chairman." I realise you all despise him but I thought it was quite a good line

Ive always thought FS does a decent job but I read something a while back which has stuck in my mind ever since. I havent got a link Im afraid but it was an interview with Ken Bates who said Gullit was always going to be a disastrous appointment because unlike Chelsea where he was basically just a coach at Newcastle he was given the job and expected to run the whole thing from top to bottom, and had no idea what to do, and had no experience of such a position.

Which is why I'm not a lawyer. Emotions however are very real, and there have been several times in my professional career where I have had to treat and care for patients that I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire should I encounter them in the street. However, I have a professional duty of care and have to get on with it. Doesn't mean I do so with a happy heart - I just have no grounds for professional conscientious objection in these cases. 76191[/snapback] Well, knowing one or two people working in law, I know that most judges have emotions too. It's just about to deal with them - especially in the way they are entitled to it by law. Nobody is going to make easy decisions, especially in cases like the one this topic is about. But to be fair, how much of background information do people on here have. What was the original sentence in detail? What's the tariff? What about the concrete decision of the parole board? There is no mistake about the original crime being horrific. And I can understand people demanding draconic punishment. But on the other hand, over 30 years in prison is already a very long time. And the life afterwards will most likely not be an easy one. The murderer will most likely remain an outcast until the end of his life (just because of that it would already be madness to return to his former home). Other things judges have to make their mind up are about the danger to public. Again this depends on the original crime. It was horrific and shocking, yes. But was it sexually motivated? If not then the danger of reoffending is pretty low as it is "normal" murderers. He killed his own children, if it wasn't for some kind of sadistic affection he won't do it again. I could go on and on about the process of decision making that is (legally) required. I don't want to be patronising (especially not to catmag, whose post I chose to respond to), but I often wonder how quick people are able to make their conclusions on the base of very little facts. That's why I normally chose to keep away from these discussions. They are most often misleading and have nothing to do with how things really are and work. 76231[/snapback] So you think we should cut his knackers off then?

Stop being so hysterical man. Sunderland are the official laughing stock

If we win!

At least he will be happy we won

this going well then

follow the link off dotcom

I'll say one thing for Pete Burns - at least he has put his money where his mouth is

Come on people, kids asnd pensioners

Im not embaressed about watching anything at all, in fact quite the opposite. I am horribly smug about enjoying tv that enrages pseudo intellectual snobs