spongebob toonpants

Another obviously unworkable bit of daily mail pleasing nonsense. You've got an unmarried mother of who makes three false claims, and she's going to get no benfits for three years. What is going to happen to the kids? We are just going to make them homeless and let them starve I take. Ill thought out window dressing bullshit

They don't now? You sure? IMHO they are well past their use by date. Unforgettable Fire album and the plane should have crashed. No one ever doubts the quality of Buddy Holly's work. edit: sorry RoP I miss read your post And mine

As you are talking about music films I saw Oil City Confidential again the other night. First band I ever saw live,I fucking loved Dr Feelgood I wonder where my love of stimulants came from

R.I.Pimp

Nice confident start by Milliband at PMQs today. Shaping up to be the best opposition leader of my lifetime

And as for Rogan Taylor -words cannot describe the hatred I have for the self appointed voice of the people

So Liverpool have spawned it again -typical

What came first. The chicken or the minutes silence?

if its a fight to the death I hope Liverpool lose

I'm going to have one more go at explaining my position on this. Under the proposal someone paying the top rate of tax with a dependant wife and two dependant children will be paying exactly the same rate of tax as somebody with no wife and dependant children. It has always been the case up til now that either by extra allowances or by child benefit the government has supported to some extent people with the responsibilty of families. If we are all in this together the fair thing is not to end this traditional support for tory family values, but to expect ALL of those who earn the high rate of tax to pay more in tax, not just those supporting families. I'm not saying these high rate earners shouldnt be paying an exra 90 quid a week in tax -I am saying they all should -

I think about it a different way - it should remain universal -the same way as the married allowance works -but everybody earning over the boundary should pay an extra £1200 a year in tax. As I said if people with children earning over 44000 can afford to have £1k a year less then shirley people without kids can The tories are always bleating on about supporting the family - funny way of showing it The people with kids are being taxed the same as those without. I have a problem a couple earning 80 grand getting an extra £2.5k a year because they chose to have three kids, it just doesn't make any sense. I don't have a problem with the tax system allowing some sort of tax break for children, in fact as children are beneficial/necesary to society existing- I think it is more than sensible for it to happen. I just think if you are going to penalise earners over 44k you should penalise all of them - not just the ones with kids. But they're not being penalised, it's just being reduced to a level playing field. And people will still be having kids regardless of whether they get child benefit or not, I just don't want to pay for them, maybe that's me being a bit selfish but it's how I feel. They self evidently are being penalised though- if you were earning 45k and receiving 2.4k child benefit you will be losing a heft chunk of your income. Now I dont object to people in the higher band paying a chunk of more tax - I just think they all should

I think about it a different way - it should remain universal -the same way as the married allowance works -but everybody earning over the boundary should pay an extra £1200 a year in tax. As I said if people with children earning over 44000 can afford to have £1k a year less then shirley people without kids can The tories are always bleating on about supporting the family - funny way of showing it The people with kids are being taxed the same as those without. I have a problem a couple earning 80 grand getting an extra £2.5k a year because they chose to have three kids, it just doesn't make any sense. I don't have a problem with the tax system allowing some sort of tax break for children, in fact as children are beneficial/necesary to society existing- I think it is more than sensible for it to happen. I just think if you are going to penalise earners over 44k you should penalise all of them - not just the ones with kids.

I think about it a different way - it should remain universal -the same way as the married allowance works -but everybody earning over the boundary should pay an extra £1200 a year in tax. As I said if people with children earning over 44000 can afford to have £1k a year less then shirley people without kids can The tories are always bleating on about supporting the family - funny way of showing it

So if I understand this child benefit situation correctly - child benefit is for families with one or both parents in work in effect a tax break for children. Family allowance as it used to be known in the same way that there is a married persons allowance. The goverment has therefore decided to raise the tax burden on families with children, whilst not raising it on families without children. If people earning over the high tax rate can afford to be £1000 - £2400 quid a year worse off when they have children surely if "we are all in it together" everybody else earning over the higher taxable band should have to pay this much more tax aswell

this Its for a game against Montenegro ffs - MONTENEGRO!! Heaped with pressure bollocks. If by any chance he does get picked he will have a fucking riot. I know England are over hyped and over rated, but he will still be getting a quality of service he will only have dreamed about playing for our mob. Those poor fuckers wouldnt know what had hit them (especially if they've been texting his missus on the sly) Put a few bob on the price for the inevitable transfer at the end of the season (January window?) as well

Tour de France winner test positive Seems a bit of a strange one given the concentration and drug- I would have expected a bit more sophistication from Alberto. His biggest mistake was probably pissing off Lance Armstrong - never ends well

I bought some canny double glazing....no wait it was this

As my old mother used to say "two wrongs don't make a right"

I've got tickets for November at London Olympia. Gonna be epic imo

Worth seeing for Bruce's hair alone

agreed

I'm not going to read this thread -I imagine I have a pretty good idea of whats been said, but if this season does exceed expectation, and Carrol/Arfa/Tiote do actually perform as well as optomism allows Ashley will be selling them at a profit without a doubt. Anybody who thinks his plan is anything other than survival and selling players at a profit is an idiot. And after last season Ashley probably doesnt even see relegation as a problem as he will imagine promotion will automatically follow' with the remaining big contracts run down bloke will always be a cunt and we won't have any chance of a decent future until he is gone

I'm pleased actually - he's more in tune with the way I think than his brother. I'm not going to be down about the press bashing him -that would happen whichever candidate won, at least he will be arguing for an economic policy that is a genuine alternative, and that is what I think the Labour Party needs to do at the moment.

And immediatly the BBC's Bullingdon boy Robinson brands him the Unions choice