Papa Lazaru

This could be very dodgy now despite an amazing effort from England. Because these are ideal conditions to bowl in for seamers and Warne will cause problems as usual which will make it very hard to bat. We have to hope the light is offered soon and off we go, because if the aussies bowl us out cheaply they will have plenty of time to bat tomorrow. But if the england batsmen stick and do their job well, particularly Vaughan, Bell and Pietersen chipping in who knows!

That is Steve, he often fills in for Ryan Maloney for public appearances.

As i said on the other thread, expect Souness to rush him back too early to try and save his own arse, put the lad out for 8 more weeks and then whinge about injuries. Unless Fred (or a hired assassin) have done the decent thing and got rid of the fucking twat.

To be fair i'd say overall decisions have been very close perhaps slightly favouring England if a team has an edge. But christ i'd take some shockers happening to the aussies tomorrow!

Some of us have never, ever been fooled as to what he is. I wanted him to prove me wrong as NUFC is what matters not being right, but as i said on the other board, everything thats happened was predicted to the letter under this shit. Fall out with flair players he can't handle because he's a child Crap coaching and fitness work brought with him shit, negative unbalanced tactics and players out of position crap efensive football and turn you into blackburn where he was about to be sacked Thers other things, but it was all predicted depressingly well before a ball had been kicked.

To be fair i don't think many people are. I'm certainly not blaming Faye, he is an appallingly bad footballer with no positive merits at all, i'm blaming the complete arsehole who signed him and plays him ahead of the likes of Clark, Bowyer and Zog AT FUCKING HOME!!!!!

Not defending him here but I seem to remember that same boost when Souness came, 9 or 10 games unbeaten wasnt it? Whats to say that after the honeymoon period we arent in the same shit state as we are now. 31303[/snapback] Like i said elsewhere we are now officially at the stage where anything whatsoever is better than this piece of shit managing our club into the ground and action has to be taken by the fat one now. Remember any new bloke coming in whether they are short term stop gap or long term solution has some good players and one world class player to work with. All they need do is have a brain, some tactics, play people where they belong, play footballers not Faye and get some spirit in the team and they will see these players shoot up the table.

Say what you see... 31297[/snapback] I'd have him as manager ahead of the scottish twat like a shot!!!

Boa Morte must have looked at today and pissed himself laughing at how lucky he was to escape being managed by the biggest prick its ever been our misfortune to suffer. And jesus wept, what must Owen be thinking now!!!

Person with even a tiny brain would play a footballer ahead of Faye, person who is a scottish twat and ruining our club would play Faye.

Right, is there anybody left now who will continue to defend this absolute braindead tw*t any longer. On top of every f*ck up and act of childishness we've suffered today was disgraceful, disgusting and embrassing. We are managed by a man who thinks Faye is not only a footballer (wrong!) but a better one in midfield to create AT F*CKING HOME TO FULHAM than Bowyer, Clark and N'Zogbia. And he thinks a right back is a better option to create for us than a mdifielder ont he right wing. We are managed by a **** who thinks home to Fulham requires negative defensive tactics and then sits on his fat arse and watches this abject humiliating shite and STILL keeps Faye on the pitch for the second half. Injuries are no excuse when he picked that line up with the 3 midfielders he had available. Of course i expect his to use injuries, the ref and the red card as piss poor excuses to hid the fact he is a talantless inbred sheep shagging tosspot who will f*ck this club up if he is alowed to. (copied from the other board, in case there are any on here who may choose to defend him not on the other board!!!)

I would say that your contribution was somewhere between a knee high boot and west highland terrier pup. 30760[/snapback] Thats quite a range! At this time of day i like to dress like a gay satan! 30924[/snapback] does he wear the no.99? 30965[/snapback] Only after winning the champions league playing as a defensive midfielder!

If its a direct quote then that is exactly what he's saying. Because he says it was "nothing to do with the fact i didn't get on with Souness" it means that even if that's not the reason he left, he didn't get on with him. 30916[/snapback] You're both making it mean what you want it to mean. Read it for what it is - an unfortunately phrased sentence. It's clearly been put to him that he didn't get on with Souness and all he's doing is saying "No, that's not why I left. It had nothing to do with me not getting on with Souness at all". But you two believe what you want to believe. 30927[/snapback] As i said if its a direct quote then he is saying he didn't get on with Souness, if its because he's unable to use the english language properly its hard for me (somebody who can) to decipher that from here! Personally i couldn't give a shit what he is or isn't saying and i'm not believing what i want to believe. If that was the case i'd have said Souness acted like a child with him and then drove him out the club for less than he was worth, but that happened with another player entirely 30931[/snapback] Seriously though, if that's what he'd said, if he'd let slip to a journalist that he didn't get on with Souness, then the article would make a lot more of it than it does, and he'd have been quizzed a lot further on it - no way would a journo let that one go. The fact that he wasn't quizzed further tells me that that's not what he was saying. 30934[/snapback] Yeah i agree with you actually, it will have just been poor use of the english language by JJ since nothing was made of it, of course that doesn't mean he definitely did get on with him!!!

If its a direct quote then that is exactly what he's saying. Because he says it was "nothing to do with the fact i didn't get on with Souness" it means that even if that's not the reason he left, he didn't get on with him. 30916[/snapback] You're both making it mean what you want it to mean. Read it for what it is - an unfortunately phrased sentence. It's clearly been put to him that he didn't get on with Souness and all he's doing is saying "No, that's not why I left. It had nothing to do with me not getting on with Souness at all". But you two believe what you want to believe. 30927[/snapback] As i said if its a direct quote then he is saying he didn't get on with Souness, if its because he's unable to use the english language properly its hard for me (somebody who can) to decipher that from here! Personally i couldn't give a shit what he is or isn't saying and i'm not believing what i want to believe. If that was the case i'd have said Souness acted like a child with him and then drove him out the club for less than he was worth, but that happened with another player entirely

I would say that your contribution was somewhere between a knee high boot and west highland terrier pup. 30760[/snapback] Thats quite a range! At this time of day i like to dress like a gay satan!

Rob started the craze of "happy slapping" back in the 1930's as a kid, but it never caught on back then. 30918[/snapback] Bet the old fashioned tripod camera was a bitch to carry around! 30919[/snapback] And having to take a portable darkroom around with him at all times was a pain in the backside!

Rob started the craze of "happy slapping" back in the 1930's as a kid, but it never caught on back then.

If its a direct quote then that is exactly what he's saying. Because he says it was "nothing to do with the fact i didn't get on with Souness" it means that even if that's not the reason he left, he didn't get on with him.

Sounds like the voice of experience... So, claw marks on the penis, good sign or bad? 30896[/snapback] Can that ever be a good thing?

They laav it 30887[/snapback] Well they would let you know if they didn't thats for sure!!!

I'm happy we may benefit, but what a fecking ludicrous rule! Its the player who has to be punished for their red card and miss three matches wherever they may move in the middle of a suspension!

You dirty fecker!

Because you're all scared that maybe Australia will play to their peak and absolutely destroy you. 30865[/snapback] Being serious, you're talking about the two top teams in the world so both are capable of winning any given test match and with Warne on fire and such a good start to their second innings and with England losing Jones i am concerned! But with a good forecast sunday and monday, and beng able to make up 30 mins a day i don't see that much time being lost overall in this test. We'd have to lose alot tomorrow for that to have any bearing on the result especially as these teams only take 4 days to get a result usually.

Sounds like a nightmare as sadly the cat doesn't know it needs it and thinks somebody just wants to stick something sharp in them. Hope all goes well.

The clue is in the name Antony...and the fact he's a bloke is a good guide as well