RobinRobin

It would have to be Stokes, and he has probably matured enough now to handle it. It may be better to have someone who understands the pressures on bowlers, albeit not the main bowlers (e.g. Anderson or Broad who would waste DRS), so that someone like Archer is not over-used, but given short sharp spells and told to run in and pitch it up as fast as possible.

Billionaire liar in possible fraudulent bookkeeping stunner!

Where's Steve Bruce when you need him?

Did he turn his back in the penalty box?

Fuck off youngsters

Oh ye of little faith

Hopefully the Post Office will fuck up, then

Of course you c

Who would have thought that the football geniuses who are Ashley and Penfold could spend way over the odds for a player their credentialed manager did not think was worth the money. Very suspect

Sort out your punctuation

Far too far

Get ready for a Trump-style NHS, then

I am afraid that 1 is the issue, and always will be. He personally has always wanted out, but won't say it. Just ends up prevaricating. However nuanced his argument may be, I just don't think it resonates, and he doesn't seem that interested, unlike, as others have said, in 2017. That was his one and only chance, and he nearly made it. That may well have been because May was even greyer that him, but against the flamboyant buffoon, he just looks bland and dull.

Bit of a concern with the world in general that someone who is regarded as less trustworthy is regarded as considerably more Prime Ministerial

I understand the point you are making, but I wonder if it is too nuanced for most. Let's see.

May be wishful thinking, though

Indeed, but just a reflection of America - Trump-lite. Sounds as though MSM journalism needs a bit of Paxman again (or more Maitlis).

Good. No doubt he will be making new tee-shirts now -

I'm more concerned that it is only 62%. What is wrong with some people? 22% actually oppose it, so 16% can't even make up their minds.

Fair enough from you and everyone else who replied - I did say from an outsider's point of view. However, given that the resounding view of the board is that voter's are stupid and like to see shiny promises, even talk about customs union or close relationship with the single market is too abstract, albeit true. I am not sure how that can be couched in terms which are understandable to the vast majority of the voting public, but the Tories' Brexit at all costs and the LDs' Remain at all costs are much simpler concepts.

Love watching that goal again

Of course not

From a (fortunately) outsider's point of view, this is the main issue. What does any of that mean? Has that not what has been argued about by everyone for the past 3 years? I am afraid it looks wishy-washy between the adamant leavers and remainers, but is clearly more on the leavers side than the remainers. So do you not end up losing the remainers completely, and splitting the leavers? Given there are probably more rabid leavers than tepid ones, what does that achieve?

RAFA ARE YOU WATCHING