Teed

It is Bob,you`ll be well at home here...

Not at all!! BRING IT ON!....

.......... Ha`way!!!! .....Ha`way!!!!!!......Ha`WAaaaaaaaaayaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jesus!!! the Fulwell end held 17 thousand people,do you seriously expect anyone to believe there wasalmost 6 thousand Mags in there!! get real I`ve heard of chinese whispers,but this is fucking stretching it!! 17,000, when exactly in 1930!!!! There were 28,098 people at Joker that day, are you honestly saying nearly two-thirds were in one stand (behind a goal). You can't critisise DK for exaggerating then blatently exaggerate yourself. The Fulwell held 17k ,even after alterations ( I forgot about them) it must of still had a capacity of 14\15k as for exaggeration,there was maybe 200 Mags tops (more like 100) they chanted "United" a few times shit their pants and legged it over the front barrier,into the clock stand,where all the old guys stood you lot need to get your heads out your arse and take the blinkers off.

Jesus!!! the Fulwell end held 17 thousand people,do you seriously expect anyone to believe there wasalmost 6 thousand Mags in there!! get real I`ve heard of chinese whispers,but this is fucking stretching it!!

What you saying oh dear for? He hates us. He's a bigger cunt than Styles. I'm beginning to think Sunderland are goiing to win this game, what with this, and Colwyn likely to be banned. And you think he gets a stiffy on thinking about us??? He cost a good few points last season the little twat!! ...

Howard webb,thats the bloke for a game of this magnitude. little big heads card happy....

Oh Dear!!!

Ha`wey man Tom!! you`s are as lucky as a lucky thing,in Lucky town with a four leaf clover.

It`s a Derby man owt can happen,and you know what spawney fuckers you`s lot are Berb! those two goals last night prove my point,the Gods even saw fit to engineer a penalty incident just to lift the crowd.I`ve never know a club so fucking lucky,if you`s fell in a tub of shit you`d come out with a gold watch so it makes it hard to predict.so Im not going to tempt fate.

The origins of the term are obscure and divided. One belief is that it was a term used by shipyard workers in the 19th century on the Tyne (see Geordie), to describe their Wearside counterparts. The Mackems would "Make" the ship to be fitted out by the "Geordies", hence "mackem and tackem" ("make them" and "take them").[3] The term Mackem could come from the Local Brewers VAUX who for centuries brewed a bottled beer called "Double Maxim". People who drank the beer would ask for a Mackem pronouncing the X differently. So a person would be called a Mackem who drank the local beer. The term could also be a reference to volume of ships built during wartime on the River Wear, e.g. "We mackem and they sink em". Alternatively, this phrase may refer to the making and tacking into place of rivets in shipbuilding, which was the main method of assembling ships until the mid-twentieth century. The earliest known recorded use of the term as applied to people from Sunderland, found by the Oxford English Dictionary occurred in 1988,[4] although "we still tak 'em and mak 'em" was found in a sporting context in 1973. This implies that the phrase was older, but there is nothing to suggest that "mak 'em" had come to be applied to people from Sunderland The origins of the term are obscure and divided. One belief is that it was a term used by shipyard workers in the 19th century on the Tyne (see Geordie), to describe their Wearside counterparts. The Mackems would "Make" the ship to be fitted out by the "Geordies", hence "mackem and tackem" ("make them" and "take them").[3] The term Mackem could come from the Local Brewers VAUX who for centuries brewed a bottled beer called "Double Maxim". People who drank the beer would ask for a Mackem pronouncing the X differently. So a person would be called a Mackem who drank the local beer. The term could also be a reference to volume of ships built during wartime on the River Wear, e.g. "We mackem and they sink em". Alternatively, this phrase may refer to the making and tacking into place of rivets in shipbuilding, which was the main method of assembling ships until the mid-twentieth century. The earliest known recorded use of the term as applied to people from Sunderland, found by the Oxford English Dictionary occurred in 1988,[4] although "we still tak 'em and mak 'em" was found in a sporting context in 1973. This implies that the phrase was older, but there is nothing to suggest that "mak 'em" had come to be applied to people from Sunderland The Mackems would "Make" the ship to be fitted out by the "Geordies" always my understanding of the term.mind! this was before all the bile and bitterness that came about in the late 60`s early 70`s "the hooligan periods" so I geuss it`s been warped into whatever people want it to mean. 1988 or 1973... I remember the term well before that! my old man worked in the yards,both Wear and Tyne and used the term "Mackem" when I was a kid in the early 50`s,He had loads of good Geordie workmates,they used to go to the match (derby) together weather it be at Roker or SJP,with no animosity,or when one team played away,they went to the others ground,but! the yards and the pits bred a comradeship that you dont get from guys wearing hair gell and working in call centres (your life hardly depends on the man you work with) shame really!! "GEORDIE" on the other hand!!! ...

Looks like your out of luck! never was a penna like.

Now now Bobby,I always had you down as one of the canny lads,by the way,learn your history it was never intended to be an insult,even though you may have been brainwashed into thinking it was...

Your acts good!! but you`ve been on to long. Aye I was actually having my dinner though. Prawn sandwich (oh aye ), Three bean salad and some kettle chips puff!! ..........

Your acts good!! but you`ve been on to long.

Shouldnt you be doing your job??

Could have been worse!! £17 million for a crock..... you reallly pulled that joke with the wrong toon fan, search Ant and Owen on the forums many a thread of me stating the same (only difference being is even for £20m and 200k a week Owen still wouldn't goto sunderland) Why would we want him? he never plays,thanks but no thanks Ant,we have our strikers and Im happy with them. aye your right, ones injured one will prob break his leg again and the other one will end up in rehab soon enough for another stint =D Im sure thats your wish. but the truth is! ones back from injury the other ones flying and the third might just score at the weekend... What's this? Poetry corner? Well Ant started it,I thought it might be nice to carry the trend on.

Could have been worse!! £17 million for a crock..... you reallly pulled that joke with the wrong toon fan, search Ant and Owen on the forums many a thread of me stating the same (only difference being is even for £20m and 200k a week Owen still wouldn't goto sunderland) Why would we want him? he never plays,thanks but no thanks Ant,we have our strikers and Im happy with them. How is bendy legs not a crock? bendy legs??? Cisse. He's spent ages out of the game. Gotcha!!! aye thats because he had two broken legs,Bobby Kerr had two broken legs too and played for years after,the good thing is,Cissé aint lost any of his pace,so thats a plus point.

Could have been worse!! £17 million for a crock..... you reallly pulled that joke with the wrong toon fan, search Ant and Owen on the forums many a thread of me stating the same (only difference being is even for £20m and 200k a week Owen still wouldn't goto sunderland) Why would we want him? he never plays,thanks but no thanks Ant,we have our strikers and Im happy with them. aye your right, ones injured one will prob break his leg again and the other one will end up in rehab soon enough for another stint =D Im sure thats your wish. but the truth is! ones back from injury the other ones flying and the third might just score at the weekend...

Right enough!! he can then expect more clubs to match his wage demands.

Could have been worse!! £17 million for a crock..... you reallly pulled that joke with the wrong toon fan, search Ant and Owen on the forums many a thread of me stating the same (only difference being is even for £20m and 200k a week Owen still wouldn't goto sunderland) Why would we want him? he never plays,thanks but no thanks Ant,we have our strikers and Im happy with them. How is bendy legs not a crock? bendy legs???

Could have been worse!! £17 million for a crock..... you reallly pulled that joke with the wrong toon fan, search Ant and Owen on the forums many a thread of me stating the same (only difference being is even for £20m and 200k a week Owen still wouldn't goto sunderland) Why would we want him? he never plays,thanks but no thanks Ant,we have our strikers and Im happy with them.

You have New owners!!!!!!!

Could have been worse!! £17 million for a crock.....