trophyshy

We're all in Ant's colony now!

Perch has the most gormless expression I have ever seen. He looks like he's the Universe short of a picnic.

Even blacked up we'll know it's you Stevie.

Stevie have you tried that eyebrow threading mate? And there's nowt wrong with a bit of nail varnish imo, why should the girls have all the fun?

proper

That might be the weirdest picture on here.

Just made some Xmas tree shaped coco-lime medicinal cookies. I'll save you one Alex.

Teenage Monroe Transfer Turtles.

At least I'm not marrying a bloke.

oof!

I was a shepherd, often despised by the audience when performing, but now they talk about me in reverential terms.

pixlr.com should do you

Rohypnol?

Me personally? I've licked out a few Asians in my time.

and I'll be in bawbag afore ye!

Is rugby wank?

Well done mate, knew you had it in you. Happy Christmas one and all!

40 is the new 30 tbh. Have a good time Tooner!

CT must be on another diet.

A whole new meaning.

Who is telling you you are talking bollocks regarding the club? One or two perhaps but those people are argued with by many others. As far as I can see almost every single criticism is about your attitude, your slagging other posters, the way you say things ( i.e. personality) rather than your opinions. You've totally missed my point anyway, which was about rising above things and being the bigger man, demonstrating genuine wisdom and humility, not flash in the pan stuff. In the spirit of Christmas, good will to all men, I challenge you to be the bigger man and let all this go, once and for all.

If this is another Deano, perhaps we could all chip in our partner's cheb pics to make up for it?

well, my views of the old board contained wisdom, and still do, but unfortunately because people still can't accept favourable comments of the old owners, I get flak and/or the comments of "spouting bollocks" continue, because its me saying what I say. I really can't do anything about that. When I make posts about the 70's and players, for instance, people say they are good posts, but when I make posts about the 70's and 80's owners in conjunction of how our fortunes changed from 1992, people refuse to accept it. Do you understand why this is so ? Because in my view, there is no difference whatsoever. Our fortunes changed from 1992 BECAUSE of the massively superior owners, and our fortunes now are declining again because of the inferior owner. I really don't see the difference, other than it being a personality hatred thing and a refusal to accept the facts. And what of humility, how can you use that concept to beat the same drum?

Not if my personality contained humility and wisdom, no.