-
Posts
16571 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Everything posted by trophyshy
-
Ah I see, I didn't realise you followed other clubs so closely. Nay bother.
-
Eh? We are constantly told we cannot compete.
-
Which of the "other 14" would you take the front line of?
trophyshy replied to Happy Face's topic in Newcastle Forum
That DoJi-Wong looks canny. -
Another Christmas day as St James's
-
Please tell me you hoyed one up Edwina's hoop.
-
-
Understandable he's not allowed a say after that tbf.
-
Does their management whine away like the youngest kid in the street that they can't compete with the big boys, financially or otherwise?
-
Pardew should release a counter statement from Mike Ashley.
-
Please be true.
-
There's a phrase I wasn't expecting today.
-
Are you chained together or manacled out of sight?
-
Does any other PL club have to listen to this shite btw? @Fish can you ask them that in the next Gone Fishing please?
-
His wages are probably outside of our 'financial means'.
-
Well done MF, any wedding pics to share?
-
Some were available, we just didn't want to pay for them. They were not as good as Shola being the rationale, I think.
-
I think Remy in a free role, and by that I mean not in prison, will directly and indirectly create considerably more chances for Cisse, which should improve his return if not his all round game.
-
The cunt in charge is the biggest concern, buy aye, why not, let's worry about Cisse's form. Do you think Remy will help Cisse to improve? Assuming he stays out of jail?
-
Perhaps we can field the stumbling block instead of Shola?
-
That asparagus looks cross.
-
They were not in our financial means.
-
At least Llambeasy put out statements which could handle a modicum of scrutiny. Who do we think actually wrote this, Ashley?
-
So some of the players available (within our financial means) were not as good as what we've got. Therefore some of the players available (within our financial means) were as good (or better?) than what we've got. Why didn't we buy them then?
-
I don't think he is. I am saying that the statement doesn't stand up to basic scrutiny with respect to the supposed infrastructure at the club, casting the scouting team in a negative light. I appreciate, as does CT, that this is nothing to do with reality and is surely an unintended consequence of a poorly written piece of propaganda. What the statement should read is 'How Much?! We're not spending that!', but they've tried to be smart arses about it, and failed, naturally.