ohhh_yeah

Andy Carroll suffers malicious false rumours Andy Carroll has suffered malicious false rumours on social media in how he has suffered his latest injury blow. Verified Instagram and Twitter accounts are falsely claiming the 29-year-old West Ham striker ruptured his ACL after falling off a balcony in Switzerland while sneaking back into his hotel room after curfew. Club insiders have confirmed the rumour is 100% fake and there no element of truth whatsoever. Claret and Hugh understand that Carroll has been experiencing discomfort in his ankle for some time and we are told he felt further discomfort after Sunday’s game in which he played 45 minutes scoring one goal and missing a penalty. He was sent for a scan which revealed he needs minor surgery to provide more strength and stability to the area which is likely to keep him out for up to 4 months. Carroll watched the England v Croatia game with the West Ham squad in Switzerland on Wednesday night before flying back to London on Thursday for treatment.

Do you origami yours?

It is coming home!

Fuck him! Hope there are mass protests!

Should of used this! or the more lazy route would of been utilizing an impactor. Your method, well, enjoy clutching the weeds every time they pop up.

Oof! Rent a pressure washer or insert your thumb over the hose nozzle. Pink seats and pink bricks are mackem down to the core.

Needs MOAR capslock though!

Not a chance with Chelsea being floated on the market.

Rafa: “I’d like to stay here for five years or 10 years if it’s possible because I can see the potential, the fans and the city. Everybody (needs to be) pushing in the right direction. “But we have to do things like I imagine has to be done in a football club.”

Melania.

Make this happen, CT! You can still have the jets and filter.

In the warmup to the match, the commentators were pitchside with the camera facing the goal. In the background you could see him have an absolute howler. He epitomes a busted flush currently.

Spotted in Moscow.

https://metro.co.uk/2018/07/07/man-gets-footballs-coming-home-tattooed-on-his-bum-7690811/

U.S. Delegates Opposed an International Resolution That Supported Breastfeeding By RENAE REINTS The United Nations-affiliated World Health Assembly in Geneva this spring became the scene of a surprising showdown, as the U.S. battled with other nations over a resolution supporting the use of breast milk, the New York Times reported Sunday. The resolution said countries should limit the misleading marketing of breast milk substitutes, as a mother’s breast milk has been shown to be the healthiest for children in decades of research. The resolution was expected to pass easily, but U.S. delegates aimed to remove language that encouraged countries to “protect, promote and support breast-feeding” in an alleged alignment with baby formula manufacturers. When this failed, the Times reported that U.S. delegates turned to threats. They reportedly told Ecuador, who planned to introduce the resolution, that if it didn’t drop the proposal, the U.S. would punish the nation with trade measures. The Ecuadorian delegates acquiesced, and health advocates struggled to find another sponsor for the resolution. The Times says this scenario was verified by several other delegates present, many of whom requested anonymity for fear of retaliation from the U.S. “What happened was tantamount to blackmail, with the U.S. holding the world hostage and trying to overturn nearly 40 years of consensus on best way to protect infant and young child health,” Patti Rundall, the policy director of the British advocacy group Baby Milk Action, told the Times. In addition to the trade threats, an Ecuadorean government official told the Times the U.S. threatened to withdrawal military support from northern Ecuador, where violence from boarding Colombia causes ongoing issues. “We were shocked because we didn’t understand how such a small matter like breast-feeding could provoke such a dramatic response,” said the Ecuadorean official, speaking with a requirement of anonymity. The Russian delegation eventually stepped in to introduce the measure, with no push-back from the U.S. “We’re not trying to be a hero here, but we feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world,” a Russian delegate told the Times, saying the decision to support the resolution was a matter of principle. The final resolution retained much of the original wording, despite American efforts. Just one portion, calling on the World Health Organization to provide support to member states seeking to halt “inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children,” was removed. A 2016 study published by The Lancet says breastfeeding could save the lives of 823,000 children and 20,000 mothers each year. In addition, universal breastfeeding could save $300 billion in reduced health care costs and improved economic prospects for children. The Times reported that the baby food market is a $70 billion industry. http://fortune.com/2018/07/08/breastfeeding-resolution-us-opposition/