aimaad22

top class stuff, keep it up lads.

with him and shola knocking them in recently i cant see why we need to spend big on replacements tbh. 168595[/snapback] Because the facing chelsea/arsenal/manutd is somewhat different to playing lillestrom and norwich. 168723[/snapback] Duck. 168725[/snapback] sorry, didnt get that. 168728[/snapback] whhhooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooossshh! 168729[/snapback] Eagle?? 168732[/snapback] Birdie? 168734[/snapback] I know. Eagle comes down with a whoooooosh and takes the duck, the birdie watches on and thanks God for making the duck tastier.

with him and shola knocking them in recently i cant see why we need to spend big on replacements tbh. 168595[/snapback] Because the facing chelsea/arsenal/manutd is somewhat different to playing lillestrom and norwich. 168723[/snapback] Duck. 168725[/snapback] sorry, didnt get that. 168728[/snapback] whhhooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooossshh! 168729[/snapback] Eagle??

with him and shola knocking them in recently i cant see why we need to spend big on replacements tbh. 168595[/snapback] Because the facing chelsea/arsenal/manutd is somewhat different to playing lillestrom and norwich. 168723[/snapback] Duck. 168725[/snapback] sorry, didnt get that.

with him and shola knocking them in recently i cant see why we need to spend big on replacements tbh. 168595[/snapback] Because the facing chelsea/arsenal/manutd is somewhat different to playing lillestrom and norwich.

Im worried about Ramage, he was awful last season and it looks like he's not getting any better now. A full back is starting to look nearly as important as a striker now.

Not to mention they've just sold their top player for the last few years or so for 5M less. Fergie's going senile methinks.

We should offer them 5M plus Boumsong for Zlatan in my opinion.

What a rip off, he's nowhere near as good as that transfer fee suggests.

The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion. 166312[/snapback] If Sky turn around and ask for clips of something that was displayed on one of their channels to be removed, they are well within their rights as they own the copyright and it is allowing the possibility of someone who has not paid a subscription to view their material. Same goes for the BBC really because people who have not paid the TV licence would be able to view material. The only 'safe' submissions to YouTube are effectively home-made clips 166327[/snapback] What excatly would qualify as 'home-made'? I thought home-made compilations are banned as well.

Gravesen is a decent player, but he wont be of any use to us. He's not better than parker, and we're stuffed in midfield already. 165746[/snapback] Gravesen is class, he's not just a sitting midfielder, but he drives his team forward (remember his Everton days?) Him and Parker together could be potentially devestating, really bossing games. 166192[/snapback] Could be, but its a big 'could be'. Gravesen is not as attacking or creative as Emre, and I think with him and Parker together there would be many a game when we'll get clogged in midfield, lack ideas and struggle to provide the forwards with good chances.

Yep, thats probably his agent talking rubbish. The idea of Faye being our best player is laughable. However if it was really Glen, then I think it was rather clever of the man for reason already explained in the above posts.

The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion.

Suppose I had a clip, uploaded onto a site and provided the link on some other website; then gave a link to that website here. Im sure that would be illegal too, is it??

We could probably get Crespo for that kind of money... 166002[/snapback]

actually you're right. I had kinda noticed the coincidence, World videos were never usualy uploaded anywhere, but someone put that Parker interview up after the Lillestrom game IIRC, and the club must have twigged it. 166013[/snapback] Does the club acutally have people searching the internet all day long for this kind of stuff?? They cant be that desperate. Or maybe they have some kind of reward for people tipping them off about these clips.

Fat Fred could offer him a bigger plane then the one chelsea did, and maybe some of dyer's cars to get to the plane.

now really

I understand the thing about NO being more high profile and thus getting more attention. But there are other sites that have got more members than NO and yet they've got thousands of clips going around in their forums, soccerpulse for instant. How do they get away with it?

He wont come to Newcastle OK!! So my question in the starting post has been answered. However I still think no club will pay around 10M for him.

Gravesen is a decent player, but he wont be of any use to us. He's not better than parker, and we're stuffed in midfield already. 165746[/snapback] Centre midfield is certainly not "stuffed" as you put it. If Faye goes we will be left with Parker, Emre (whose fitness over a season is questionable) and Butt. You cannot even include Dyer into the equation. It could be argued that N'Zog etc can tuck infield, but I would much rather go with a central midfielder playing in the centre than putting more square pegs in round holes. 165755[/snapback] So even if Faye leaves, we've got 3 CMs plus dyer, and other players who can slot in to that position if necessary. Apart from Zoggy, Milner is also capable of playing in an attacking central midfield position. I wouldnt mind another CM. But only if we got a striker and a defender first. The situation in those positions needs more attention than CM.

Thats ridiculous stuff then, considering that one or two free sites had the goals up in a matter of hours.

Are you suggesting we raise the funds ourselves? 165743[/snapback] Yeah, we love the club dont we?? No, I meant we'll wait and see if some club makes that offer.

P.S Faye is rubbish and I hope he leaves.

Gravesen is a decent player, but he wont be of any use to us. He's not better than parker, and we're stuffed in midfield already.